AIRLINK 80.60 Increased By ▲ 1.19 (1.5%)
BOP 5.26 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.31%)
CNERGY 4.52 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (3.2%)
DFML 34.50 Increased By ▲ 1.31 (3.95%)
DGKC 78.90 Increased By ▲ 2.03 (2.64%)
FCCL 20.85 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (1.56%)
FFBL 33.78 Increased By ▲ 2.38 (7.58%)
FFL 9.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-1.52%)
GGL 10.11 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-1.37%)
HBL 117.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.07%)
HUBC 137.80 Increased By ▲ 3.70 (2.76%)
HUMNL 7.05 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.71%)
KEL 4.59 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.71%)
KOSM 4.56 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-3.8%)
MLCF 37.80 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (0.96%)
OGDC 137.20 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (0.37%)
PAEL 22.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.35 (-1.51%)
PIAA 26.57 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.08%)
PIBTL 6.76 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-3.43%)
PPL 114.30 Increased By ▲ 0.55 (0.48%)
PRL 27.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-0.69%)
PTC 14.59 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-1.08%)
SEARL 57.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.35%)
SNGP 66.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.75 (-1.11%)
SSGC 11.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.81%)
TELE 9.11 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.3%)
TPLP 11.46 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.87%)
TRG 70.23 Decreased By ▼ -1.87 (-2.59%)
UNITY 25.20 Increased By ▲ 0.38 (1.53%)
WTL 1.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-5%)
BR100 7,626 Increased By 100.3 (1.33%)
BR30 24,814 Increased By 164.5 (0.67%)
KSE100 72,743 Increased By 771.4 (1.07%)
KSE30 24,034 Increased By 284.8 (1.2%)

The coalition government of the Pakistan Democratic Movement (PDM) is approaching completion of its tenure in the next few days. While presenting their last budget for the current fiscal year (FY 2024), the fourth-time federal finance minister, Muhammad Ishaq Dar, stated that Pakistan’s GDP growth for the year is projected to be 3.5 percent.

Furthermore, the budget 2023-24 allocates approximately Rs 1150 billion for Public Sector Development Program (PSDP). This includes Rs 80 billion for Prime Minister Initiatives, Rs 54.5 billion for aviation division, Rs 5.4 billion for defence and defence production, and Rs 8.5 billion for federal education and professional training division.

Additionally, the budget allocates Rs 5.97 billion for Higher Education Commission, Rs 1.4 billion for law and justice, and Rs 25.04 billion for planning, development, and special initiatives division.

In the prevailing circumstances, it is uncertain whether the amount allocated and approved by the parliament for PSDP will be fully utilized or if the budget would undergo another revision before end of the current financial year, like the previous year.

Additionally, Pakistan bears a substantial burden of domestic and external debts. The current year’s gross financing requirements for Pakistan are close to US$28 billion, while the projected current account deficit for the same period stands at US$6.4 billion. This indicates that the pressure on our foreign exchange reserves will persist throughout the year.

An alarming, rather the most alarming factor is that despite the government’s historic budget allocation for PSDP, it seems to have missed the opportunity to capitalize on new markets and claim its fair share in the era of fourth industrial revolution to increase the volume of exports.

Pakistan is still relying on orthodox methods to boost its exports and expects $30 billion in forex during the financial year, which is nothing but peanuts compared to its imports.

The gap between Pakistan’s imports and exports is widening with the passage of time and instead of taking corrective measures, Pakistan is becoming dependent on import of household items that can be produced in the country.

On the one hand, we are struggling to maintain our foreign exchange reserve up to a specific level to avert default and, on the other, our volume of import for the current fiscal year (2023-2024) is anticipated to reach US$64.7 billion, showing trade deficit of negative US$33.9 billion as envisaged in the IMF’s latest Report.

Unfortunately, this gap is expected to widen further, projecting the volume of exports for financial years 2024-25, 2025-26, 2026-27, and 2027-28 at approximately US$33 billion, US$35 billion, US$38 billion, and US$40 billion, respectively.

In contrast, imports for the same years are estimated atUS$68 billion, US$73 billion, US$77 billion, and US$82 billion, resulting in trade deficit of negative US$35 billion, US$37 billion, US$39 billion, and US$41 billion, respectively, in these years.

It is a fact that our successive governments have failed to appreciate the importance of future challenges, resulting in faulty policies or frameworks for their redressal. Consequently, the burden on common citizens has increased significantly with heavy taxes and inflation, making it difficult for them to fulfill their basic needs.

Simultaneously, high cost of doing business has posed sustainability challenges for small and medium enterprises (SMEs), which are considered the backbone of economy.

Furthermore, our tax revenue measures display a regressive approach as the existing taxpayers bear heavy tax burdens to meet revenue targets, while the authorities seem disinterested in introducing measures to tax new untaxed sectors and broaden the tax base. There is a pressing need for forward-thinking policies and proactive measures to tackle these issues and ensure a more equitable and sustainable economic environment.

Pakistan should reconsider the practice of providing subsidies and injecting funds into struggling industrial units and commercial organizations. For the current fiscal year, the government has allocated Rs. 1064 billion for subsidies, with approximately Rs. 580 billion allocated to Wapda and Pepco, Rs. 315 billion to KESC, and over Rs. 50 billion for the petroleum sector.

Additionally, Pakistan Railways will receive a special grant of approximately Rs. 55 billion during this financial year, marking an increase of around Rs. 10 billion compared to the previous financial year of 2022-2023. It is important to reassess sustainability and effectiveness of such subsidies to ensure a more prudent allocation of resources and foster long-term economic stability.

The prevailing outlook of our economy highlights flawed priorities, which suggest a lack of interest in implementing fiscal reforms despite agreements with global lenders. It seems that political interests take precedence over national interests.

Substantial volume of subsidies and grants injected by the government to provide relief to the masses ultimately adds little value and only exacerbates the misery of the poor. Instead, these funds could be strategically invested in improving social sector growth, leading to better living standards for the less fortunate and stimulating economic activities, resulting in increased government revenue. Emphasizing such reforms would be a step towards aligning our priorities for the nation’s welfare and prosperity.

We also need to place emphasis on the growth of our industries to bolster our exports and thereby reduce our trade deficit. It is essential to reconsider our alliances and foster bilateral relations based on trade. While China has consistently stood with us during challenging times, we must acknowledge that our volume of exports to China is currently trivial and does not align with the potential of both countries.

It is time for us to engage in renegotiating trade agreements with China, considering the concerns of our Pakistani business community. We should strive to secure access to markets and benefits for our business community as Pakistan offers to the Chinese. By addressing these issues, we can strengthen our economic ties and establish a more balanced and mutually beneficial trade relationship with China.

Pakistan should also not ignore its major trade partners, e.g., the United States of America, Europe, and the United Arab Emirates. It is important for us to actively engage with them, address their concerns, and foster stronger trade relations. By doing so, we can enhance our trade ties and promote mutually beneficial economic cooperation with these key partners as well as our neighboring and regional partners, especially countries forming the Golden Ring.

It is imperative that we admit the above facts sooner than later. Running a country with an over 230 million population with the burden of loans, trade deficits, and passive imprudent foreign policy and trade relations is unsustainable. Taking timely action and addressing these issues is important for ensuring a more stable and prosperous future for Pakistan and its citizens.

(Huzaima Bukhari & Dr. Ikram Haq, lawyers, and partners of Huzaima, Ikram & Ijaz, are Adjunct Faculty at the Lahore University of Management Sciences (LUMS), members of the Advisory Board and Visiting Senior Fellows of the Pakistan Institute of Development Economics (PIDE) and Abdul Rauf Shakoori is a corporate lawyer based in the USA and an expert in ‘White Collar Crimes and Sanctions Compliance’)

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Dr Ikramul Haq

The writer is a lawyer and author of many books, and Adjunct Faculty at Lahore University of management Sciences (LUMS) as well as member of Advisory Board and Visiting Senior Fellow of Pakistan Institute of Development Economics (PIDE). He can be reached at [email protected]

Huzaima Bukhari

The writer is a lawyer and author of many books, and Adjunct Faculty at Lahore University of management Sciences (LUMS), member of Advisory Board and Visiting Senior Fellow of Pakistan Institute of Development Economics (PIDE). She can be reached at [email protected]

Abdul Rauf Shakoori

The writer is a US-based corporate lawyer, and specialises in white collar crimes and sanctions compliance. He has written several books on corporate and taxation laws of Pakistan. He can be reached at [email protected]

Comments

Comments are closed.

zaya zaya Jul 28, 2023 03:39pm
Very worthy analysis, especially the emphasis on Exports Diversity to enhance overall exports; this can only come from death of some declining export industries and widening the product range for exports, new products must be generated. IT sector can be a big winner as we know the talent is there and it was starting to takeoff in 2021/22
thumb_up Recommended (0)
KU Jul 28, 2023 05:42pm
You are right on all aspects, but just viewing the urgency of bills presented in NA on July 27, yesterday, it seems there are other priorities for the schemers. Over 130 bills were presented, most of them regarding the establishment of various institutes of higher education from south to north and east to west, we are surely going to outsmart every country in the world. Not a single bill or mention of industry or agriculture revival, nor was any legislation or plan related to the revival of business for these sectors, are we still hopeful about the economy?
thumb_up Recommended (0)
test Jul 29, 2023 08:28pm
Media has a problem they just place a person picture on their website and put all the crime on it. The thing is that there is a common pattern from Liaquat to Ayub to Bhutto to Zia to Benazir to Musharraf to Zardari to Nawaz to Imran which is they are all western puppets and are chosen by the elite class to beg for dollars so that they elite class can maintain their lavish lifestyle. They are doing it from the very beginning of our homeland and will continue to do so. The elite class consists of politicians, generals, judges, billionaires, policy makers and media houses etc. They have their personal political, financial and foreign western interests. Imran said he will commit suicide but will not go to IMF but he went to IMF and didn't commited suicide. Nawaz said it is better to die than to go to IMF but he went to IMF and he didn't die. Just like politicians and billionaires Pakistani armed forces created fake wars to increase defence budget to enjoy lavish lifestyle post retirement.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Awami Jul 31, 2023 08:37am
China is most efficient producer in world. Making free trade agreement with the most efficient country is suicidal. Only exports are 'Chawal, Chamada and Chaddar ( Rice,leather and cloth) while all other things are imported from China. This has lead to demise of all small and midsize industries. Only left is Real Estate , we can not import buildings. A govt. has duty to look for all people , care for local small and midsize industry. Domestic consumption should be to support local business. There are no hopeful signs in future.
thumb_up Recommended (0)