AIRLINK 75.50 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (1.34%)
BOP 4.73 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
CNERGY 4.18 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.97%)
DFML 40.12 Increased By ▲ 0.77 (1.96%)
DGKC 88.80 Increased By ▲ 3.90 (4.59%)
FCCL 22.99 Increased By ▲ 1.09 (4.98%)
FFBL 30.47 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (0.86%)
FFL 9.23 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.22%)
GGL 10.14 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-2.5%)
HASCOL 6.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-2.05%)
HBL 106.50 Decreased By ▼ -1.75 (-1.62%)
HUBC 140.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-0.11%)
HUMNL 10.59 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (2.82%)
KEL 4.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.63%)
KOSM 4.39 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.68%)
MLCF 38.40 Increased By ▲ 0.90 (2.4%)
OGDC 123.60 Decreased By ▼ -1.04 (-0.83%)
PAEL 24.62 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (0.74%)
PIBTL 6.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.61%)
PPL 114.30 Decreased By ▼ -2.10 (-1.8%)
PRL 24.06 Decreased By ▼ -0.54 (-2.2%)
PTC 13.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.61%)
SEARL 59.60 Increased By ▲ 3.61 (6.45%)
SNGP 61.80 Decreased By ▼ -1.18 (-1.87%)
SSGC 9.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-2.13%)
TELE 7.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-1.75%)
TPLP 10.07 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.41%)
TRG 65.20 Increased By ▲ 0.70 (1.09%)
UNITY 26.90 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (0.9%)
WTL 1.34 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.52%)
BR100 7,701 Decreased By -17 (-0.22%)
BR30 24,706 Decreased By -71.5 (-0.29%)
KSE100 73,754 Decreased By -108.9 (-0.15%)
KSE30 23,617 Decreased By -74.6 (-0.31%)

LETTER: This is apropos Business Recorder op-ed "Debt Relief" carried by the newspaper yesterday. The writer, Dr Ashfaque H Khan, has provided the newspaper readers a comprehensive perspective on country's debt obligation. No doubt his is a highly informative take on the subject of a very high import. He has argued, among other things, that "the [newspaper] readers would recall that Pakistan has given a written commitment to the IMF that debt maturing of China and Saudi Arabia would not be repaid during the IMF program period. Pakistan, therefore, was not required to repay $922 million out of $1.8 billion anyway. The real benefit of debt relief under the G-20 initiative reduces to $878 million only. Is this the amount for which the Prime Minister and the Foreign Minister had to appeal to the international community? Was there any reputational loss to Pakistan?"

It clearly shows that prime minister's initiative, however praiseworthy, has yielded only a little benefit to the country. This development raises some serious questions about the competence of his economic team which appears to have failed to carry out the required home-work. In other words, it did little or nothing to help the country cash in on the opportunity in a meaningful manner.

Tauseef Haider (Islamabad)

Comments

Comments are closed.