AIRLINK 80.60 Increased By ▲ 1.19 (1.5%)
BOP 5.26 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.31%)
CNERGY 4.52 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (3.2%)
DFML 34.50 Increased By ▲ 1.31 (3.95%)
DGKC 78.90 Increased By ▲ 2.03 (2.64%)
FCCL 20.85 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (1.56%)
FFBL 33.78 Increased By ▲ 2.38 (7.58%)
FFL 9.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-1.52%)
GGL 10.11 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-1.37%)
HBL 117.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.07%)
HUBC 137.80 Increased By ▲ 3.70 (2.76%)
HUMNL 7.05 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.71%)
KEL 4.59 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.71%)
KOSM 4.56 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-3.8%)
MLCF 37.80 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (0.96%)
OGDC 137.20 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (0.37%)
PAEL 22.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.35 (-1.51%)
PIAA 26.57 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.08%)
PIBTL 6.76 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-3.43%)
PPL 114.30 Increased By ▲ 0.55 (0.48%)
PRL 27.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-0.69%)
PTC 14.59 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-1.08%)
SEARL 57.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.35%)
SNGP 66.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.75 (-1.11%)
SSGC 11.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.81%)
TELE 9.11 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.3%)
TPLP 11.46 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.87%)
TRG 70.23 Decreased By ▼ -1.87 (-2.59%)
UNITY 25.20 Increased By ▲ 0.38 (1.53%)
WTL 1.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-5%)
BR100 7,629 Increased By 103 (1.37%)
BR30 24,842 Increased By 192.5 (0.78%)
KSE100 72,743 Increased By 771.4 (1.07%)
KSE30 24,034 Increased By 284.8 (1.2%)

The Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) is legally empowered to proceed against companies in public interest for creating a level-playing field to enhance economic efficiency and to protect consumers from anti-competitive behaviour.

According to an order issued by the CCP Appellant Bench in the matter of complaint filed by M/s OLX Classifieds Pakistan (Complainant) against M/s Pak Wheels (Pvt) Ltd (respondent), the bench has clarified powers of the commission to proceed in public interest.

A three-member CCP bench said that upon conclusion of the enquiry under the Competition Act and in pursuance of the provisions of Section 37(4) of the Act, the commission may initiate proceedings under Section 30, where it is in the public interest, so to do (emphasis added).

Hence, from the language used in the Act, it is clear that the intent of the legislature behind the Act that is to create a level-playing field in order to enhance economic efficiencies and to protect consumers from the anti-competitive behaviour is that the commission has to proceed in public interest.

Thus, the commission is entrusted with the responsibility of looking after the interest of general public vis-à-vis anti-competitive conduct, and to create a level-playing field, in order to enhance economic efficiency in all spheres of commercial and economic activity and that too in public interest.

The proceedings before the commission are inquisitorial in nature and not adversarial; as the commission is carrying out its functions in public interest, the CCP Bench said.

The legislature, in all its wisdom, therefore, carefully crafted the framework under the Act, and we deem it appropriate to refer to the provisions of Section 33 of the Act in this regard, in particular, clauses (e) and (b) of sub-section (1) of Section 33 of the Act, the CCP bench said.

Bare perusal of the above provision leaves no doubt that the legislature, in all its wisdom, has used the word "proceeding" along with "enquiry" in Section 33 (1) mentioned above.

This means that the commission, even after initiation of proceedings under Section 30 of the Act retains the power to investigate or gather evidence, if it deems necessary in public interest.

This intent of the legislature to empower the commission with the inquisitorial/investigative authority during the proceedings under Section 30 of the Act is further evident from the provisions of Section 34(1) of the Act, the CCP added.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2020

Comments

Comments are closed.