LAHORE: A customs official has allegedly charged levy of smartphones against a consignment of ordinary phones, said sources.
According to details, an importer had imported ordinary mobile phones, but the customs official categorized them as smartphones to apply a higher levy.
It may be noted that the legal provision was previously meant to impose mobile handset levy on smartphones supported by a table which gave categories of smart phones and rates of levy per set. Subsequently, an amendment resulted into replacing the words ‘category of smartphone’ with the words ‘mobile phones having C&F Value (US Dollars)’.
Stance of the Customs official was that by changing the table, it had been conferred the power to recover the said levy not only on the smartphones but also on the ordinary phones which did not fall in the category of smartphones.
The importer made a presentation to the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) against the viewpoint of the department, which referred the same to the finance division for a clarification.
In the meantime, the relevant appellate forum reached the conclusion that without amending the charging section, and merely by amending the table, the levy could not be recovered. It further maintained that the reference to the table was to the extent of the rates which were to be specified and in view of the fact that the charging section remained unaltered, therefore, the charging section itself could not stand altered or amended by a mere substitution of column in the heading of the table.
The department, on the other hand, was of the view that the intention of the legislature was clear that the phones other than the smart phones were also subjected to the levy as reflected in the table.
But the importer won his stance by agitating that the right to recovery of any levy rests in the charging section and the table is merely meant to prescribe the rates at which such levy is to be recovered on various goods/items. Unless the charging section confers a power to recover a levy on the article or class of goods, mere mention of a different class, types of category of goods clearly goes beyond the scope of charging section.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2024
Comments
Comments are closed for this article.