AIRLINK 65.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.70 (-1.06%)
BOP 5.57 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-2.11%)
CNERGY 4.56 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-1.94%)
DFML 24.52 Increased By ▲ 1.67 (7.31%)
DGKC 69.96 Decreased By ▼ -0.74 (-1.05%)
FCCL 20.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.25%)
FFBL 29.11 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
FFL 9.83 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.01%)
GGL 10.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.69%)
HBL 114.25 Decreased By ▼ -1.00 (-0.87%)
HUBC 129.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.40 (-0.31%)
HUMNL 6.71 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.15%)
KEL 4.44 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (1.37%)
KOSM 4.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-2.59%)
MLCF 37.00 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.11%)
OGDC 132.30 Increased By ▲ 1.10 (0.84%)
PAEL 22.54 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.27%)
PIAA 25.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.41 (-1.56%)
PIBTL 6.60 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.07%)
PPL 112.85 Increased By ▲ 0.73 (0.65%)
PRL 29.41 Increased By ▲ 1.02 (3.59%)
PTC 15.24 Decreased By ▼ -0.87 (-5.4%)
SEARL 57.03 Decreased By ▼ -1.26 (-2.16%)
SNGP 66.45 Increased By ▲ 0.76 (1.16%)
SSGC 10.98 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.36%)
TELE 8.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-1.57%)
TPLP 11.70 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (1.47%)
TRG 68.62 Decreased By ▼ -0.62 (-0.9%)
UNITY 23.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.55 (-2.3%)
WTL 1.38 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (2.22%)
BR100 7,295 Decreased By -9.1 (-0.12%)
BR30 23,854 Decreased By -96 (-0.4%)
KSE100 70,290 Decreased By -43.2 (-0.06%)
KSE30 23,171 Increased By 50.4 (0.22%)

As their parting gift, before they left, Caretakers have increased gas prices again to comply with the IMF (International Monetary Fund). Rationalizing gas prices is the right move to end the growth of the gas circular debt, as the last round of hike price was not enough. There is a socioeconomic limit to the increase in the residential segment where the increase is ranging from 5 to 67 percent in various slabs with a higher impact to be felt on the lower income groups.

The prices for the commercial segment were already high and there is no change there while the prices of bulk consumers are raised again. However, the above-mentioned increases in prices have not been enough to end the circular debt growth; hence the prices for industries and fertilizer manufacturers had to be increased as well.

However, the industry is losing competitiveness and cannot take any further burden of cross subsidy. Hence, the increase is mainly for captive users, and the discrimination of exporting and non-exporting sector has ended. That is a good move.

To balance the equation, the principal decision is to have uniform pricing for fertilizer manufacturers where the price variation was huge for production of an almost homogenous product (Urea). Here the price increase is massive. However, there is no check on the price and margin control of fertilizer companies who have historically not passed on the full benefit of low prices to farmers. In fact, in the case of increase in prices, some companies may see windfall profits.

These companies are enjoying over 30 percent gross margins, which are much higher than those in other countries. The point to raise here is that profits and margins of these companies should be regulated as the sector is protected and the chief raw material (gas) is provided at a cheaper rate to ensure fertilizer prices are lower.

These are big companies and have entry barriers. Thus, suppliers are big while buying power of individuals (the farmer) is low, and there is no substitute of the product available in the market. These are key ingredients for companies to form cartels and extract the benefit from buyers (farmers).

It appears that the increase in fertilizer prices is likely to have undue increase in the profitability of two companies – Engro fertilizer and Fatima fertilizers. Partial gas supply of these companies is already on the Power Policy 2012 and are already paying top price. With recent increase, their weighted average cost increase would be less than others’ (such as Fauji Fertilizer) and they may increase the prices as much as Fauji Fertilizer, which will swell the gross margins of these companies further. That should not happen.

The above-mentioned argument assumes that Mari gas prices which supplies mainly to Fauji Fertilizer will increase in line with the increase in pipeline gas supply to others. The notification is awaited. If the Mari gas price increase does not happen soon, then the beneficiary would rather be Fauji Fertilizer, as the company could increase the price in line with the increase by others whereas there is no increase in the cost.

Clarity is warranted, as one or the other fertilizer manufacturer would make extra profits based on the revised gas prices where the objective is to end the circular debt. Apart from this, there is another issue. If the gas prices are lower than the cost of Sui companies, the circular debt is formed and that has to be covered by the federal government. However, if the gas prices are higher than the cost, the extra profit goes to the provinces in the form of Gas Development Surcharge (GDS).

There are two issues. One is that fertilizer companies may benefit from higher cost as the overall price increase in Urea is higher, which is to be borne by farmers and eventually to be translated into food inflation. The other is that gas subsidies are a liability of the federal government while the surplus is enjoyed by provinces.

These lopsided incentives should be corrected. The next step is to regulate the margins of the fertilizer companies. They should move to the tolling model by having gross margins capped on per ton urea basis – similar to the Indian model. There must be a fixed gross margin regime to ensure the benefit of gas prices to be fully passed on to the farmers.

As of now, the concern is inflationary impact of gas prices where the direct impact of increase in domestic consumers is not much. But the fertilizer price increase could have a secondary round. This creates doubt about stock brokers’ forecast of inflation coming down significantly in the next few months.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Author Image

Ali Khizar

Ali Khizar is the Head of Research at Business Recorder. His Twitter handle is @AliKhizar


Comments are closed.

Qasim Feb 19, 2024 06:15pm
You can increase the price of gas and electricity until you turn blue in the face, it is not going to change anything as long as the wapda and gas companies continue to steal
thumb_up Recommended (0)
SZS Feb 19, 2024 09:21pm
Needs to be broken down in simpler language if ordinary reader is to be better informed. The narrative /language is fine for the business sector only.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Az_Iz Feb 19, 2024 11:25pm
Cheap petrol, electricity, gas. Country cannot afford subsidies, when it does not have the money. Slowly, it is beginning to undo this.First petrol, then electricity and now gas.
thumb_up Recommended (0)