AIRLINK 175.55 Decreased By ▼ -2.01 (-1.13%)
BOP 11.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.36%)
CNERGY 8.29 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.47%)
FCCL 47.23 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.19%)
FFL 16.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.62%)
FLYNG 27.31 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.15%)
HUBC 142.32 Decreased By ▼ -4.59 (-3.12%)
HUMNL 13.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-1.55%)
KEL 4.44 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-1.33%)
KOSM 5.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.17%)
MLCF 61.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-0.35%)
OGDC 226.77 Decreased By ▼ -7.91 (-3.37%)
PACE 5.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.52%)
PAEL 44.80 Decreased By ▼ -1.61 (-3.47%)
PIAHCLA 17.88 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-1.32%)
PIBTL 10.47 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.95%)
POWER 12.02 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.25%)
PPL 185.92 Decreased By ▼ -5.88 (-3.07%)
PRL 37.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.43%)
PTC 24.05 Increased By ▲ 0.85 (3.66%)
SEARL 100.29 Decreased By ▼ -0.60 (-0.59%)
SILK 1.15 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SSGC 38.51 Decreased By ▼ -1.20 (-3.02%)
SYM 14.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.28 (-1.86%)
TELE 7.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.4%)
TPLP 11.03 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.72%)
TRG 66.00 Decreased By ▼ -1.29 (-1.92%)
WAVESAPP 10.97 Decreased By ▼ -0.38 (-3.35%)
WTL 1.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.74%)
YOUW 3.78 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.27%)
BR100 12,826 Increased By 19.4 (0.15%)
BR30 38,861 Decreased By -842.2 (-2.12%)
KSE100 118,792 Decreased By -146.5 (-0.12%)
KSE30 36,779 Increased By 22.6 (0.06%)

ISLAMABAD: M/s Sinopec, China’s Petroleum Refineries Company, and Saudi giant, M/s Aramco, are reportedly not satisfied with the data provided by the Pakistan State Oil (PSO) for huge investment of about $10 billion in a refinery as a trilateral joint venture under the umbrella of China- Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), well-informed sources told Business Recorder.

The issue of establishment of a refinery is under discussion with Riyadh since long at the highest level, but it has not materialised due to very slow movement.

According to the plan, M/s Aramco has to develop non-binding trilateral (Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and China) MoU on preparation of feasibility study for crude to chemical refinery plant.

Sinopec not interested in refinery project

PSO, had also approached Chinese giant, M/s Sinopec, to join the project but later intimated that it is not interested in crude refinery but can consider petrochemical plant, subject to its feasibility.

However, now Pakistan’s ambassador to China has appraised that Sinopec is not satisfied with the data provided by PSO, whereas, Aramco has also raised its apprehensions on the market study carried out by PSO.

“Both parties now want that Pakistan side should carry out new/ updated market study to further proceed in the matter,” the sources added.

The managing director PSO had informed to a high-level meeting that a Board meeting is being convened for seeking approval to conduct fresh market study in line with the desires of Sinopec and Aramco. It is; however, unclear if the Board has given its consent on new market study or not.

Petroleum Minister Dr Musadik Masood Malik, who presided over the meeting to review update on the follow up of the prime minister’s visit to KSA in April 2024, was of the view that it seems M/s Sinopec is not interested in the project. He directed that fresh/ updated market study may be carried out at the earliest.

PSO, which is interacting with Bank of China and Sinopec, had also written a letter to President Sinopec Corp Yu Baocai, Managing Director/ Chief Executive Officer PSO Syed Muhammad Taha conveyed PSO’s interest in inviting Sinopec, a global leader in the energy sector, to participate in a major Greenfield refinery and petrochemical project in Pakistan.

Minister for Planning, Development and Special Initiatives held a meeting with the company’s Vice President LV Lianggong to discuss prospects of establishing a refinery in collaboration with M/s Aramco and PSO, who argued that the give the ongoing debate on climate change, the refinery business was contracting. He added that Sinopec would; therefore, accord a careful consideration to that proposal.

Sinopec is of the view that it has to evaluate the whole eco-system, which requires a network of pipelines, jetties, an analysis of the cost of inputs; and rate of investment. As Pakistan lacks such infrastructure, the cost of production would be too high, resulting in diminished rate of returns. Sinopec; however, would be willing to discuss trading of petrochemical products and that too on the basis of supply and demand.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.

Fakhar Jul 27, 2024 09:57am
Incompetent people at PSO , secretary petroleum, minister should resign
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Khadim Hussain Jul 27, 2024 11:11am
In Pakistan any type of business is not possible until we terminate whole beurucracy.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Aamir Latif Jul 27, 2024 01:32pm
Many studies done time to time in past, does a mega Refinery with imported crude justify given Pakistan market 800"kms away from proposed site at Gwadar. Do better homework prior calling world
thumb_up Recommended (0)
irfan daud Jul 27, 2024 03:08pm
Saindak Copper Project led by brother & yet no technology transfer was made. Stop relying on Iron bro, whose own interest are high. Learn from Bangladesh Power Projects and India clear export policy
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Sagar Baloch Jul 28, 2024 01:02am
For pakistan,Only the price of investment is necessary.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Arij H Khan Jul 28, 2024 07:17pm
With taxation levels as high as in Pakistan, foreign investors would have to be crazy to even consider investing in Pakistan.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
ali Jul 31, 2024 04:39am
Pso s study and comptence is third class as there Pso gas stations
thumb_up Recommended (0)