AIRLINK 61.49 Increased By ▲ 2.99 (5.11%)
BOP 6.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.16%)
CNERGY 4.15 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (4.8%)
DFML 16.24 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (1.44%)
DGKC 67.47 Decreased By ▼ -1.08 (-1.58%)
FCCL 17.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.06%)
FFBL 25.62 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.47%)
FFL 9.24 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.43%)
GGL 10.02 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (2.24%)
HBL 114.75 Increased By ▲ 0.75 (0.66%)
HUBC 112.57 Increased By ▲ 0.72 (0.64%)
HUMNL 6.61 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.23%)
KEL 4.44 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.6%)
KOSM 4.57 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.44%)
MLCF 38.02 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (0.58%)
OGDC 125.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.43 (-0.34%)
PAEL 22.53 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.09%)
PIAA 11.13 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PIBTL 6.48 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (4.85%)
PPL 108.21 Decreased By ▼ -0.79 (-0.72%)
PRL 27.91 Increased By ▲ 1.10 (4.1%)
PTC 10.78 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (2.18%)
SEARL 52.86 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.3%)
SNGP 66.57 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (0.33%)
SSGC 11.39 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (3.36%)
TELE 7.22 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.12%)
TPLP 11.91 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.75%)
TRG 77.93 Increased By ▲ 1.48 (1.94%)
UNITY 21.91 Increased By ▲ 1.50 (7.35%)
WTL 1.31 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BR100 6,499 Increased By 58.4 (0.91%)
BR30 22,266 Increased By 167.8 (0.76%)
KSE100 63,306 Increased By 490.1 (0.78%)
KSE30 21,296 Increased By 162.7 (0.77%)

Gas price rationalization is a big reform undertaken by the caretaker government in view of the fact that in the past successive political governments failed to implement it. Increases in prices of gas have remained inadequate since 2013-14, and that is the core reason behind the buildup of gas circular debt.

The good news is that with these pricing reforms, there would be zero buildup in the gas circular debt. The next in line is to deal with the stock of hardcore debt – the work is in progress, and soon some formula must be tabulated for it.

There is a method behind the price increase, which consists of two key features. First, price rationalization across the sectors will lead to more efficient utilization of gas molecules, and the other is that it shall reduce the disparity between industrial sectors across the country.

This shall be achieved by implementing a weighted average cost of gas for industrial sectors by fixing the price of natural gas, and the blended price based on estimated mix of RLNG. And overall revenues’ requirements are matched by a revenue-sharing formula between the two Sui gas companies through ‘cost of gas equalization agreement’.

The price for most domestic consumers is yet too low. These protected consumers are about 57 percent of consumers whereas the pipeline gas is being provided to 30 percent (mainly urban) of the country’s households. Rates are now progressive and top consumers are aligned with the LPG cost. Now there would be no cheap gas for urban elite to warm their swimming pools in winters.

And the natural gas reserves are declining at a CAGR of 5-7 percent and going forward, marginal domestic consumer will gradually move towards the alternate sources.

The biggest increase is in the commercial segment (by 2.4x to Rs 3,900/mmbtu) where the misusage was blatant – for example, there is a big Mall in Islamabad making electricity from commercial gas connection.

Many commercial consumers have been behaving with a sense of entitlement. With 30 percent of pipelined consumers, 51 percent are paying RLNG i.e., approximately 15 percent of commercial users in the country received cheap gas. Now, they would perhaps be better off moving towards LPG or grid-based electricity.

The increase for bulk of consumers is marginal –25 percent increase to Rs 2,000/mmbtu. Here, mainly housing societies receive this gas to produce their own power for its residents. The price should have increased higher; but that is not the case. And in case of tandoors, the low rate is maintained to ensure roti prices do not increase.

The price of fertilizer received a marginal increase and feed price is still lowest (barring protected domestic consumers) in the country.

There are two rationales for keeping prices low. One is for the farmer to receive Urea at affordable prices. Urea prices in Pakistan are less than half of the imported price, and any direct subsidy to farmer would be more challenging, given the poor governance structure in the country.

The experience of direct subsidy on DAP fertilizer was of abject failure. Without thinking through, a sudden increase in urea prices could create food security challenges in Pakistan. The other rationale is of low BTU gas whose usage is limited to a few sectors and its costs on Mari network is low too.

The most interesting and difficult pricing reform is reducing the disparity of the rate withing industries across jurisdictions – North players were paying much higher than the South. And within the South, the new connections’ rates were much higher than the old ones. For example, one Mall in Karachi which is getting low price gas due to its legacy connection, and exporters in Punjab were paying much higher than domestic market players producing candy and other stuff.

Going forward, there will be no discrimination between old and new connections. The natural (domestic) gas tariff is being set at Rs 2050/mmbtu for export — both captive and process.

Then the final price is computed based on some blending ratios which have been selected based on supply of natural gas and LNG in north and south, and at current PKR/USD parity and LNG rates. The blended cost is estimated at Rs 2200-2300 ($7.5-8/mmbtu) in South and Rs 2,610-2,760 ($9-9.5/mmbtu) in North.

Moreover, the tariff for natural gas is set at Rs 2,600/mmbtu for non-exporting sectors, and the estimated blended price is Rs 2,600 for South and Rs 3,340 for North.

The overall disparity between the pricing has been reduced, and there is an increase in price for South and a decline for North. A win-win solution has been found.

Going forward, ensuring timely revisions ineffective tariffs based on the increase in RLNG in the mix and its cost in PKR will be crucial.

A complex spreadsheet model is being developed by the ministry team, which has also come up with the negotiated pricing where full cost recovery is ensured to plug in the circular debt growth. Next in line is to deal with Rs1500bn-1600bn gas circular debt (excluding duplication of power sector and late payment surcharges). More on this later.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Author Image

Ali Khizar

Ali Khizar is the Head of Research at Business Recorder. His Twitter handle is @AliKhizar

Comments

Comments are closed.

Cool boy Oct 30, 2023 10:41am
While the world prefers on spot LNG price around 5 USD Pakistan went for long term 13-14 dollar mmbtu LNG price. This does not accounts for regasification costs. Imported fuel lobby now wants to milk poor Pakistani consumer so that expensive imported gas could be subsidized to factory mafia which usually keeps is assets in foreign countries.... Total day light robbery
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Abrar Ahmed Oct 30, 2023 11:15am
For some reason, we like to make any and all commodities expensive and then claim an for the rich for using these. This is not absurd but pathetic. What we really need to do is to increase production and sell cheap. Gas can be made from so many things and from so many ways. WAPDA advertising less use of electricity is the biggest joke of this century, but our mindless leaders can not comprehend such jokes
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Awami Oct 30, 2023 10:33pm
@Abrar Ahmed, Nothing is wrong in urging people to use less. As every Cubic ft of LNG sold incurs loss ( Loss of dollars ) to Govt of Pakistan. What is wrong in suggesting to use modestly to conserve country's foreign exchange. If export was more than import then one can spend dollars without any bad effects .
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Ghareeb Awam Oct 31, 2023 11:49am
Are you suggesting that the caretaker government should continue to stay in power because they have worked wonders with gas sector reforms? Nothing has changed and we are moving from bad to the worse. Regardless of facts, figures, economic terms and the like, ghareeb Awam continues to be at the receiving end in true sense of the phrase.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Student Nov 01, 2023 12:22pm
@Awami, Using sources efficiently will prevail instead of preaching austerity, spending on essential commodities is not waste of money.
thumb_up Recommended (0)