AVN 68.48 Increased By ▲ 1.38 (2.06%)
BAFL 31.00 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BOP 4.91 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.2%)
CNERGY 3.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.79%)
DFML 14.23 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-1.39%)
DGKC 41.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.5%)
EPCL 45.37 Decreased By ▼ -1.20 (-2.58%)
FCCL 11.71 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.17%)
FFL 5.10 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.59%)
FLYNG 5.85 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.86%)
GGL 10.41 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.1%)
HUBC 68.50 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (0.74%)
HUMNL 5.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.17%)
KAPCO 28.22 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.43%)
KEL 2.26 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-1.31%)
LOTCHEM 25.10 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.2%)
MLCF 21.58 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-0.51%)
NETSOL 88.35 Increased By ▲ 2.35 (2.73%)
OGDC 99.30 Increased By ▲ 6.92 (7.49%)
PAEL 11.11 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.18%)
PIBTL 4.23 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.24%)
PPL 82.45 Increased By ▲ 2.30 (2.87%)
PRL 13.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-2.2%)
SILK 0.90 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SNGP 44.38 Increased By ▲ 0.91 (2.09%)
TELE 6.18 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (3.69%)
TPLP 15.81 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.51%)
TRG 119.75 Increased By ▲ 4.74 (4.12%)
UNITY 14.10 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (1.81%)
WTL 1.26 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (8.62%)
BR100 4,171 Increased By 47 (1.14%)
BR30 15,253 Increased By 323.5 (2.17%)
KSE100 41,523 Increased By 332 (0.81%)
KSE30 15,663 Increased By 168.9 (1.09%)
Print

Reko Diq mining project: Settlement with Barrick Gold endorsed by SC

  • Top court says that process for the reconstitution of the RekoDiq project has been undertaken transparently and with due diligence
Published December 10, 2022
Follow us

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court has opined that the parameters set out in its judgment in Abdul Haque Baloch’s case have been duly addressed by the federal and provincial governments in the reconstituted Reko Diq gold and copper mining project, therefore, it is legal.

A five-judge bench, headed by Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial, and comprising Justice Ijazul Ahsan, Justice Munib Akhtar, Justice Yahya Afridi, and Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhel, on Friday, announced the short order of its reserved opinion on the Reference sent by President Dr Arif Alvi under Article 186 of the Constitution. The detailed reasons will be recorded later.

The reference contained two questions; “i) Whether the earlier judgment of this Honourable Reference No.2/2022 6 Court reported as [Maulana] Abdul Haque Baloch v. [Government of Balochistan], PLD 2013 SC 641 or the laws, public policy or Constitution of Pakistan prevent the GoB and the GoP from entering into the Implementation Agreement and the Definitive Agreements [Agreements] or affect their validity?

ii) If enacted, would the proposed Foreign Investment (Protection and Promotion) Bill, 2022 [FI Bill 2022] be valid and constitutional?”

The 13-page opinion stated that the process for the reconstitution of the RekoDiq project has been undertaken transparently and with due diligence. “The Agreements are being signed by authorities duly authorized and competent to do so under the law. To ensure transparency and fairness, expert advice on the financial, technical and legal issues involved has been sought from both local as well as independent international experts/consultants on the terms settled in the Agreements.”

Reko Diq deal: SC inquires about any mining policy, legal framework formulated

“The Agreements have been put in place after due deliberation and have not been found by us to be unconstitutional or illegal on the parameters and grounds spelt out in Abdul Haque Baloch’s case (PLD 2013 SC 641),” added the Court.

About the second question, the apex court declared that the rationale, basis, legality and vires of the FI Bill 2022 as well as the amendments to its schedules and annexures and the amendments incorporated through SROs, provided the resolutions are passed by the Sindh and Balochistan Provincial Assemblies and the Bill is passed by the Parliament after following due process, shall be duly enacted as required under the Constitution. And such laws and regulatory measures do not in any manner violate the Constitution or the Law.

In detail, the Court answered the Reference in terms that;

i) It is settled law that while disposal of public assets through a competitive process is the ordinary rule, it is not an invariable rule. The Constitution does not forbid disposal of public assets other than through a competitive process so long as such disposal has the support of the law and is justified on rational grounds, as is the case here.

ii) Ever since the enactment of the Constitution, legislative competence to deal with mines and mineral development (other than minerals used for nuclear energy) has rested exclusively with the Provincial Assemblies. Therefore, the Provincial Assemblies of Sindh and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa have already enacted comprehensive statutes dealing with mines and mineral development (other than minerals used for generation of nuclear energy). It follows from the legislative ambit of the Provincial Assemblies under the Constitution that they are competent to “alter, amend or repeal” any existing law to the extent that it deals with mines and mineral development.

The Court said as far as the amendment incorporated in the Regulation of Mines and Oil fields and Mineral Development Reference No.2/2022 8 (Government Control) Act, 1948 (1948 Act) is concerned, which has been introduced by way of the 2022 Act, to the extent that the said statute applies to the Province of Balochistan it is intra vires the Constitution and the rules framed by the GoB under Section 2 of the 1948 Act.

The 2022 Act can therefore be treated as a standalone provision that operates alongside the 1948 Act and the rules insofar as the subject of mines and minerals development (other than oil fields and mineral resources necessary for generation of nuclear energy) falls within the exclusive legislative competence of the provincial legislature.

It said that the Balochistan Cabinet has approved the decision to enter into the Agreements on the basis of a detailed summary, which considers “public interest” inherent in the negotiated agreement and since the Agreements pertain to an “international obligation” in terms of the 2022 Act (i.e., Pakistan’s obligation to make payment of approximately US$ 6 billion under an ICSID award dated 12.07.2019), the formal obligations required under the 2022 Act for entering into a negotiated agreement stand fulfilled.

The opinion said that prima facie, the Agreements cannot be faulted for lack of due diligence on the part of State authorities. The Agreements do not, prima facie, violate any of the findings recorded in the Abdul Haque Baloch case (PLD 2013 SC 641). Unlike CHEJVA, the decision to enter into the Agreements is backed by law and has been taken on the basis of careful negotiations during which authorized representatives of GoP/GoB were duly assisted by independent international consultants.

The Court said that the agreements require Barrick to act in accordance with both international environmental standards and domestic laws.

On the second question, the Court opined provided that the draft resolutions are passed by the Provincial Assemblies of Sindh and Balochistan, Parliament will be competent to enact the FI Bill 2022, including the notified exemptions specified in the Bill and the protected benefits listed in the Third Schedule.

“The provisions of Section 3 of the FI Bill 2022 do not in our opinion fetter the sovereignty of Parliament. It appears that the FI Bill 2022 represents a version of the Protection of Economic Reforms Act, 1992. It allows the Federal Government to notify certain benefits which may not be withdrawn to the prejudice of an investor.”

The Supreme Court noted that the FI Bill 2022 is not limited exclusively to the RekoDiq project. Instead, it provides a framework for grant of investment incentives which will, subject to the provisions of the Bill, be available to all investments of US$ 500 million or more. The fact that the RekoDiq project is the first to be identified as a “Qualified Investment” under the FI Bill 2022 does not render the statute as “person-specific.”

The Court noted that the proposed FI Bill 2022 will not only pave the way for implementation of the RekoDiq project in its present form but will also facilitate and encourage direct foreign investment in similar mining projects and other high capital intensive industries in which direct foreign investment is required to be encouraged through guarantees assured by laws and regulatory measures.

The Court expected that Barrick would contribute substantially towards Corporate Social Responsibility by dedicating a percentage of its returns towards provision of fresh drinking water, health facilities, schools and local infrastructure to the people of Balochistan. In addition, most of the labour force will be employed from amongst the local population of the Province. In addition, programs for development of skills will also be put in place, and the applicable minimum wage laws will be fully observed.

REUTERS adds: Supreme court on Friday endorsed a settlement with Barrick Gold to resume mining the Reko Diq, one of the world’s biggest copper and gold deposits sites in the country’s southwest, a court order showed.

The short order was read out by the Chief Justice of Pakistan Umar Ata Bandial, who headed a five-person panel. A Reuters reporter was present in the court.

Barrick Gold ended a long-running dispute with Pakistan, agreeing to restart developing the mining project under an out of court agreement earlier this year.

Under the deal, Barrick Gold withdrew a case from an international arbitration court, which had slapped an $11 billion penalty against Pakistan for suspending contracts of the company and its partners in 2011.

The court endorsement was a condition of the settlement to resume mining, that will invest $10 billion.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2022

Comments

Comments are closed.

usamakhan akhund Dec 10, 2022 12:12pm
I think they go and talk to engro group of companies i think there is hope
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Muqarrab Dec 10, 2022 03:43pm
As far as I guess there's nothing in Reko Diq. I think our government and foreign mining companies just make an agreement, after few months Pakistan or other party break the contract or agreement. One party goes to the court, government gives loose evidence so that other party can win. Government pay them compensation. Both could've divided that money between them. Thats it. If there were any Gold we could've got that half century ago.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Fateh Shah Arif Dec 11, 2022 10:36am
The only question of it real worth need to be highlighted by court as the report of geological Survey of Pakistan according to expert didn't consider during process, or checked which show its approximate worth. Either the worth of project is the agreed value or it was more than it where the country and province lose a lot as compare to announced and agreed worth. This question will restore the confidence of the people of Balochistan to come as formal part of the overall process. It will not only restore the confidence but people will not hear the rumours running in market against the national interst.
thumb_up Recommended (0)

Reko Diq mining project: Settlement with Barrick Gold endorsed by SC

Rupee falls 0.35%, settles at 276.28 against US dollar

PM Shehbaz orders establishment of relief fund to aid Turkiye

Earthquake rescue work moves slowly in Turkiye, Syria as death toll passes 5,000

Intra-day update: KSE-100 Index up over 500 points

Debt reprofiling viable option for Pakistan under IMF watch: report

Islamabad court rejects Sheikh Rashid’s bail petition

IMF should work with Pakistan to protect the deprived: Human Rights Watch

Toshakhana case: Islamabad court defers Imran Khan's indictment

High-income earners directed to pay 50pc of super tax liability

Policy-level talks with IMF begin today