AIRLINK 184.92 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-0.15%)
BOP 9.61 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-3.22%)
CNERGY 7.26 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.41%)
FCCL 36.43 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.57%)
FFL 14.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-1.31%)
FLYNG 24.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.64 (-2.57%)
HUBC 126.41 Decreased By ▼ -0.42 (-0.33%)
HUMNL 12.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-2.07%)
KEL 4.29 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.69%)
KOSM 5.94 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.98%)
MLCF 42.27 Decreased By ▼ -0.62 (-1.45%)
OGDC 198.51 Increased By ▲ 3.07 (1.57%)
PACE 6.08 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-3.34%)
PAEL 37.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.55%)
PIAHCLA 17.09 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (1.12%)
PIBTL 7.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.64%)
POWER 9.22 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-1.81%)
PPL 168.09 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (0.12%)
PRL 32.75 Decreased By ▼ -1.27 (-3.73%)
PTC 22.42 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.4%)
SEARL 101.88 Decreased By ▼ -2.09 (-2.01%)
SILK 1.07 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-10.08%)
SSGC 35.53 Decreased By ▼ -0.42 (-1.17%)
SYM 17.92 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-0.99%)
TELE 8.17 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.87%)
TPLP 11.70 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.6%)
TRG 66.12 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.06%)
WAVESAPP 11.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-2.8%)
WTL 1.53 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.66%)
YOUW 3.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.52%)
BR100 11,609 Increased By 39.9 (0.34%)
BR30 34,116 Increased By 81.8 (0.24%)
KSE100 110,323 Increased By 21.8 (0.02%)
KSE30 34,411 Increased By 24.5 (0.07%)
Business & Finance

FBR chief stands firm on decision to purchase 1,010 cars for tax officers

  • Sales tax cannot be collected without site visits, Rashid Mahmood Langrial says
Published January 26, 2025

The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) Chairman Rashid Mahmood Langrial on Sunday reaffirmed determination to purchase 1,010 cars for tax officers, saying the decision would help achieve the set tax collection target for the current fiscal year 2024-25.

The development came after the Senate Standing Committee on Finance and Revenue raised objections on the FBR’s decision to purchase new vehicles.

Senator Faisal Vawda called for an immediate halt to the purchase, arguing that the FBR officers were being rewarded with vehicles despite a significant tax shortfall.

“This is open corruption, and we will not sit idly by,” Senator Vawda asserted, accusing the FBR of misusing government funds during the Senate committee meeting earlier this week.

However, on Sunday, FBR chief defended the decision, saying new cars were required for tax officers to go into the fields to collect revenue in taxes.

“We will buy the cars. This is the Cabinet decision,” Langrial said while talking to the media on the sidelines of the International Customs Day 2025 organised by the Collector of Customs Enforcement in Karachi.

He claimed that the Senate Standing Committee raised objections on the procedure, but not on purchase of the cars. “We will get the procedure reviewed.”

Langrial further said the reservations and objections raised by the Senate Standing Committee “will be answered clearly and loud…in a humble way and with all due respect”.

He reiterated that the vehicles were required for the officers for field operations.

“They are young people (officers). How would they collect sales tax (without availability of proper transportation)? Sales tax cannot be collected until you do site visits,” Langrial said.

Responding to a question, the FBR chief maintained that the tax collection body would achieve its set target for FY25.

FBR has been tasked to collect Rs12.9 trillion in the current fiscal year.

However, the tax body remained short of Rs386 billion during the first six months (Jul-Dec) of FY25 against the assigned target of Rs6,009 billion for the said period.

Meanwhile, Langrial apprised that the FBR received bids to reinstall the live tracking system on both – vehicles transporting containers and on containers as well – to make the goods transportation system strengthened, transparent, and more secure.

The vehicles move containerised cagro to factories and to Afghanistan from Pakistan’s ports.

Earlier this month, a media report stated that the government had temporarily halted satellite tracking of containers carrying imported goods to Afghanistan from seaports and instead begun monitoring them through human surveillance, a move that may “increase the chances of smuggling”.

PBC raises concerns on reported termination of satellite tracking of Afghan cargo

FBR chairman on Sunday said the live tracking system on vehicles and containers “has not been ended, but is being improved”.

“DG will announce names of the new applicants most probably this week. Tracking sensors will be installed on both the vehicles and on the containers. The new tracking system will be in place within two to three months,” Langrial said.

The ongoing partial manual system to monitor transportation of containerised cargo “is fully satisfied”, according to the FBR chief.

The contract with the previous tracking company was ended after several years “to break its monopoly”, he added.

Responding to another question, Langrial termed Karachi the commercial capital, adding that the port city would continue to take lead in tax collection for having presence of the head offices of many large businesses.

Regarding the house sector, the FBR chief informed that Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif constituted a task force for the sector.

The main issue in the housing sector is the higher transaction taxes, according to Langrial. “We are doing a review on the subject these days,” the FBR chairman said.

Comments

200 characters
KU Jan 26, 2025 06:07pm
Sales tax n site visits can be achieved in affordable priced vehicles, why is FBR adamant on Rs. 7 million each cars? Shameful when we survive on loans/aid/roll over of loan repayment.
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Citizen Jan 26, 2025 07:08pm
Federal Government should go for private partnership in this regard by issuing some SOPs and hire per visit services from Careem, drive, bikea or askari cars to utilize available resources judicially using commonsense
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Firat Mehmet Jan 26, 2025 07:19pm
FBR Chief should push for banning transfer of registration of vehicles in the name of ineligible persons as well. If the law is for new vehicles tax thieves will circumvent through 2nd hand purchase
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Fatima tul zahra Jan 26, 2025 07:36pm
Cm Punjab I need a laptop for my better study I am student of IT i need it alot.
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Fatima tul zahra Jan 26, 2025 07:37pm
Aoa CM Punjab I am Fatima I am student of IT I need a laptop for my better study in future .
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Pakistani Jan 26, 2025 08:04pm
Each person who get a car should have clear KPIs which includes 10 time revenue collection over the previous year to ensure that the cars are used to get more recovery.
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Danish Ahmad Jan 26, 2025 08:11pm
If government incorporate conveyance allowance according to the market rate in the salaries of tax officials it will result huge saving of resources, purchase of vehicle will be too costly to afford.
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Arsalan Jan 26, 2025 08:13pm
Why a 4th world country has to buy Honda's for their collection officers, when a standard Suzuki is more then enough. FBR shouldn't act childish and further waste our tax money on their wishes. Stop them and make a precedent for all.
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
IK Jan 26, 2025 08:47pm
Federal Government should go for private partnership in this regard by issuing some SOPs and hire per visit services from Careem, drive, bikea or askari cars to utilize available resources.
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
zh Jan 27, 2025 01:27am
It is unimaginable the the FBR chief will forgo the gains.
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Arsalan Jan 27, 2025 03:41am
Why a 4th world country has to buy Honda's for their collection officers, when a standard Suzuki is more then enough. FBR shouldn't act childish and further waste our tax money on their wishes. Stop them and make a precedent for all.
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
SV Jan 27, 2025 02:11pm
Yango
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply