AIRLINK 164.00 Decreased By ▼ -1.36 (-0.82%)
BOP 10.58 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (1.83%)
CNERGY 8.40 Increased By ▲ 0.57 (7.28%)
FCCL 47.24 Increased By ▲ 1.59 (3.48%)
FFL 15.30 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (1.19%)
FLYNG 26.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.11%)
HUBC 137.19 Increased By ▲ 1.91 (1.41%)
HUMNL 12.99 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.09%)
KEL 4.30 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (2.63%)
KOSM 5.63 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (2.93%)
MLCF 60.80 Increased By ▲ 1.37 (2.31%)
OGDC 215.60 Increased By ▲ 2.53 (1.19%)
PACE 5.54 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (2.4%)
PAEL 41.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-0.29%)
PIAHCLA 17.65 Increased By ▲ 0.60 (3.52%)
PIBTL 10.22 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (2.92%)
POWER 11.88 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.76%)
PPL 174.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-0.06%)
PRL 35.65 Increased By ▲ 1.29 (3.75%)
PTC 22.95 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (1.1%)
SEARL 95.08 Increased By ▲ 1.33 (1.42%)
SSGC 36.47 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (1%)
SYM 14.00 Increased By ▲ 0.52 (3.86%)
TELE 7.27 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (2.11%)
TPLP 10.25 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.39%)
TRG 61.93 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (1.64%)
WAVESAPP 10.39 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.07%)
WTL 1.31 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (2.34%)
YOUW 3.72 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.54%)
BR100 12,388 Increased By 74.4 (0.6%)
BR30 36,995 Increased By 487.9 (1.34%)
KSE100 115,532 Increased By 623 (0.54%)
KSE30 35,662 Increased By 120.4 (0.34%)

LAHORE: the Customs department has failed to establish use of an oil tanker in smuggling of diesel, as the relevant appellate forum has confirmed release of the vehicle while dismissing the reference, said sources.

According to details, the department had confiscated an oil tanker involved in smuggling of fuel, and nobody was in it when the department had taken it into custody. Allegation was that oil tanker was used for smuggling of High Spirit Diesel (HSD) without proper documentation. Department filed Reference application as the Customs Appellate Tribunal while setting aside Order-in-Original, ordered release of the vehicle-in-question against the payment of 20%.

The department took the plea that oil tanker was very much part and parcel of the illegality and violation made by the respondent. Official record revealed that when the oil tanker was taken into custody there was nobody in it, thereafter it was taken the concerned Customs House. When a show-cause notice was issued, in response the owner of the oil tanker appeared and submitted before the Customs authorities that he had nothing to do with the HSD and stated that his oil tanker was plying on hire basis.

Despite the fact that the subject-vehicle was found abandoned but it was also confirmed that it was registered with Motor Vehicle Authority. However, the appellate forum noted that the Authorities failed to acquire details and to issue show-cause notice to the owner. Though ownership documents were furnished, however, no effort was made by the authorities to verify the same from the Excise Department.

Also, prior to the incident, the department was not in possession of any material or evidence against the owner of the oil tanker to be involved in any objectionable activity.

It added that the authorities made no effort to create a link between the HSD and the oil tanker, which established that the confiscation of HSD and the oil tanker were two different aspects requiring different treatments.

Therefore, the relevant appellate forum maintained that confiscation of the oil tanker was unwarranted and could not be approved.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Comments

Comments are closed.