AIRLINK 184.71 Increased By ▲ 0.85 (0.46%)
BOP 12.12 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (2.54%)
CNERGY 7.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.27%)
FCCL 47.52 Increased By ▲ 1.14 (2.46%)
FFL 16.15 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
FLYNG 28.51 Increased By ▲ 0.73 (2.63%)
HUBC 141.58 Increased By ▲ 6.49 (4.8%)
HUMNL 13.18 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.92%)
KEL 4.63 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.22%)
KOSM 6.31 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.77%)
MLCF 60.37 Increased By ▲ 1.20 (2.03%)
OGDC 225.48 Increased By ▲ 2.42 (1.08%)
PACE 6.07 Increased By ▲ 0.28 (4.84%)
PAEL 48.14 Increased By ▲ 3.19 (7.1%)
PIAHCLA 18.27 Increased By ▲ 0.61 (3.45%)
PIBTL 11.05 Increased By ▲ 0.39 (3.66%)
POWER 11.83 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.85%)
PPL 189.65 Increased By ▲ 2.60 (1.39%)
PRL 36.36 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.25%)
PTC 24.52 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-1.01%)
SEARL 102.92 Increased By ▲ 1.97 (1.95%)
SILK 1.15 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SSGC 36.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-0.62%)
SYM 15.71 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.13%)
TELE 8.11 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (2.92%)
TPLP 11.26 Increased By ▲ 0.43 (3.97%)
TRG 70.31 Increased By ▲ 3.69 (5.54%)
WAVESAPP 11.16 Increased By ▲ 0.34 (3.14%)
WTL 1.40 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (5.26%)
YOUW 3.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.79%)
BR100 12,602 Increased By 143.7 (1.15%)
BR30 39,293 Increased By 986 (2.57%)
KSE100 117,974 Increased By 972.9 (0.83%)
KSE30 36,496 Increased By 361.4 (1%)

Amid a 15 percent decline in domestic demand, considerably limited utilization of existing capacity, and no major expansion plans on the horizon, the cement industry cumulatively borrowed roughly Rs48 billion in fresh credit on October 24. This follows months of negative net borrowing, a trend that has visibly only waned for a one or two-month period in the past two years.

Why is the cement industry in need of so much liquidity so suddenly? Is this in preparation for the cloak-and-dagger construction package being mulled over by the Prime Minister; perhaps a redo of the colossal failure that was his predecessor’s pet project, Naya Pakistan? Sadly, even if such a project was on the radar of cement companies, the excess capacity they are currently holding is enough to meet a build-up in immediate demand, though any major construction package will not lead to an abrupt surge in demand anyway. Nevertheless, in 5MFY25, capacity utilization for the industry roughly stands at 55 percent. By that measure, to reach 90 percent capacity utilization, the industry will have to grow by over 60 percent during FY25, year on year.

Even if one were to assume that the fresh lending will go toward expansions—which has no solid basis—SBP data on loans by type of finance shows that 96 percent of the net borrowing (for cement) will be used to meet short-term working capital needs, with the remaining 4 percent split between fixed-term borrowing (2%) and foreign bill discounting (2%). So, expansions seem unlikely.

Moreover, the industry is certainly not starving for cash. In the last recorded quarter, 13 listed cement companies generated Rs25 billion in after-tax earnings. The problem is that the share of cement borrowing in October 2024 remained at 3 percent of private sector loans and 5 percent of manufacturing lending—no change from historical shares. This suggests a systematic increase in overall lending, likely driven by banks rushing, nay sprinting to increase their lending in order to lower their advance-to-deposit ratio (ADR) and avoid the punitive tax imposed by the FBR.

It is reasonable to conclude that the sudden surge in lending for cement (see graphs) does not signal a massive boom in the construction sector or a resurgence of Naya Pakistan’s second coming, likely repackaged in N-league speak, though nowhere near as catchy as its predecessor. Consider the industry’s profits for the next quarter padded with “other income”.

Comments

200 characters
jawad Dec 18, 2024 09:40am
They are doing arbitrage. Banks with ADR issues might lent them short term lines at sub kibor and the cement companies invested the excess liquidity with banks looking for high cost deposits. Simple.
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply