AIRLINK 74.85 Increased By ▲ 0.56 (0.75%)
BOP 4.98 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.61%)
CNERGY 4.49 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (2.75%)
DFML 40.00 Increased By ▲ 1.20 (3.09%)
DGKC 86.35 Increased By ▲ 1.53 (1.8%)
FCCL 21.36 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.71%)
FFBL 33.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-0.79%)
FFL 9.72 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.21%)
GGL 10.45 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.29%)
HBL 112.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-0.23%)
HUBC 137.44 Increased By ▲ 1.24 (0.91%)
HUMNL 11.42 Decreased By ▼ -0.48 (-4.03%)
KEL 5.28 Increased By ▲ 0.57 (12.1%)
KOSM 4.63 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (4.28%)
MLCF 37.80 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.4%)
OGDC 139.50 Increased By ▲ 3.30 (2.42%)
PAEL 25.61 Increased By ▲ 0.51 (2.03%)
PIAA 20.68 Increased By ▲ 1.44 (7.48%)
PIBTL 6.80 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.34%)
PPL 122.20 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.08%)
PRL 26.58 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.26%)
PTC 14.05 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.86%)
SEARL 58.98 Increased By ▲ 1.76 (3.08%)
SNGP 68.95 Increased By ▲ 1.35 (2%)
SSGC 10.30 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.49%)
TELE 8.38 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.24%)
TPLP 11.06 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.63%)
TRG 64.19 Increased By ▲ 1.38 (2.2%)
UNITY 26.55 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.19%)
WTL 1.45 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (7.41%)
BR100 7,841 Increased By 30.9 (0.4%)
BR30 25,465 Increased By 315.4 (1.25%)
KSE100 75,114 Increased By 157.8 (0.21%)
KSE30 24,114 Increased By 30.8 (0.13%)

Father of the Nation Quaid-e-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah in his speech at Ziarat, Balochistan, in 1948 stated that: “We Musalmans in general and young men in particular, do not know the value of money. A paisa saved today is two paisa tomorrow, four paisa after that and so on and so forth. Because of our addiction to living beyond means and borrowing money we lost our sovereignty in this sub-continent.” A good 75 years later the fiscal sovereignty of Pakistan remains forfeited with the lenders.

Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif in his inaugural speech early this week lamented that the entire federal government expenditure is met through borrowing. He said only little is left in the federal government’s kitty after the transfer of funds to the provinces.

Pakistan averted a default last summer because of a short-term IMF (International Monetary Fund) bailout. With 60 percent of state revenue exhausted in loan payoffs and only 40 percent left out to fund the needs of the nation, the IMF is once again looked upon as the saviour, and rather desperately.

The 23rd IMF bailout programme will end next year and Pakistan is all set to yet again knock at the door of the IMF for a new bailout programme of an extended IMF facility of $ 6 billion. This would be the 24th IMF programme the nation would be entering into in its short history of 76 years - meaning an IMF programme every three years and that Pakistan’s fiscal sustainability remaining perpetually subservient to IMF. Perhaps no country has been so addicted to the IMF lending as Pakistan is.

India had sought financial assistance from the IMF seven times but never since 1993. The repayments against the loans taken from the IMF were completed by May 2000 and thereafter India never went to the IMF, thereby restoring its sovereignty over its economy in an effective and meaningful manner.

It also helped India pursue its global political/ economic objectives and forge alliances based on its national interests. A war-ravaged Vietnam borrowed from the IMF in 1993 and additional loans in 1994 to alleviate poverty and its economy and successfully repaid all loans by 2012 and never looked back at IMF on the strength of building its own financial resources and robust economy.

Recognising the urgency, PM Shehbaz Sharif has indicated that he will personally monitor the talks with the Fund. In the same breath, he underlined his commitment to undertake hard decisions - the decisions which matter a lot.

The rhetoric of hard decisions is often heard about but never publicly made transparent as to what these hard decisions exactly are and what they actually mean to a society so distinctly divided into elite minority and the deprived majority with different set of standards for both.

So far the hard decisions, under the IMF dictate, have been the withdrawal of subsidies, thereby hitting the industry and the deprived class in terms of inflation, layoffs due to businesses and industry closure on account of high cost of doing business, perpetual utility and fuel price hikes.

Insofar as the real hard decisions, which truly matter, are concerned, they have been left out on account of political expediency, vested interests and incompetence to manage reforms in the economic and fiscal disciplines of the country.

The glaring examples of the wastage of public funds left unattended are the loss-making public sector enterprises, circular debt in the energy sector on account of incompetence and misgovernance, reckless government expenditure in terms of self-awarded privileges by legislatures and public office holders, unnecessary and reckless expenditure on 33 federal ministries - some of which are superfluous while some redundant on account of transfer of responsibilities to provinces under the 18th amendment.

Then there are sensitive issues like the public money waste on account of National Finance Commission (NFC) Award.

The concept behind the NFC Award was that the funds related to social sector like education, healthcare, civic facilities and other areas in the general public interest would be awarded out of the federal pool to the provinces for their better utilisation in public interest. The disbursement of funds in public interest lacks transparency and has not served its purpose. There is a dire need to revisit the Award and plug the waste.

The prime minister has hinted at revisiting the NFC Award in order to deal with the growing challenge of burgeoning debt burden. But for any review of the NFC Award, there is a need for consensus among all the provinces.

That seems improbable in the present situation with the provinces being ruled by different political parties, especially with KP under the PTI’s (Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf’s) control. Any change in the existing arrangement would need political reconciliation, which doesn’t seem to be happening in the current atmosphere.

Also, the rhetoric for the need of structural reforms is resounding. Here too the public is at a loss to comprehend what exactly are the structural reforms the government is aiming at. Bifurcation of FBR (Federal Board of Revenue) could well be one structural reform. Clarity from the government on structural reforms is desirable.

The real issue, though, is whether the government, with multiple coalition partners having diverging interests, beyond doing a patch-up job, would be in position to take tough decisions, and initiate some fundamental structural reforms. Furthermore, political stability in the country is a must for the economic and fiscal stability of the country. The challenge ahead is daunting, demanding best of statesmanship.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Farhat Ali

The writer is a former President, Overseas Investors Chamber of Commerce and Industry


Comments are closed.

Az_Iz Mar 09, 2024 05:19am
A paisa saved today is two paisa tomorrow. China,Indonesia,India,Bangladesh & Pakistan were equally poor a few decades ago.Their avg savings rate was 30%,but Pakistan was 15%.Pakistan is now behind.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Az_Iz Mar 09, 2024 05:23am
Not saving enough is Pakistan's biggest problem.Many countries equally poor saved at twice the rate, and surged ahead.Pakistan is left behind.A low income country cannot consume and become wealthy.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Az_Iz Mar 09, 2024 05:27am
There is such a thing called good debt and bad debt. Borrow to pay for consumption, you sink deeper. Borrow and invest to increase productivity, it will lead to progress.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Az_Iz Mar 09, 2024 06:47am
It is difficult to fathom how a low income country can build wealth and prosperity, with low savings rate.Yet, it is not discussed much.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Truthisbitter813 Mar 09, 2024 09:09am
We've been here many times before. I for one am not holding my breath for things to change anytime soon. What we could hope for is at least stability for 3 years then another establishment wild card.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
KU Mar 09, 2024 11:23am
We are faced with a simple case of corrupt leadership as well as administration, and being governed by West Pak Company for wealth. People know the reasons behind rich leaders and bankrupt Pakistan.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Rational Economics Mar 09, 2024 11:51am
"A paisa saved today is two paisa tomorrow" How is this possible when inflation strangling everybody's necks?
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Fatima Mar 09, 2024 02:04pm
@Az_Iz, India,Bangladesh are on the path to being middle income countries, as have a host of other poor countries.There is a path for Pakistan to follow, but unlikely to happen with current ‘managers’
thumb_up Recommended (0)
wanker Mar 09, 2024 04:13pm
Paisa saved today is half a paisa tomorrow due to inflation. Jinnah was wrong about this.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Az_Iz Mar 09, 2024 09:05pm
@Rational Economics , it is possible, if you save and invest.If you just keep your savings under a mattress,it will loose value. Take a long term investment horizon. Invest a little bit every month.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Az_Iz Mar 09, 2024 09:13pm
@Rational Economics ,every country has inflation.If you don't invest your savings,it will loose value.Save and invest,even a little, every month.And you will be better off than just spending it all.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Az_Iz Mar 09, 2024 09:20pm
@Rational Economics , savings helps in fighting inflation. So, if you save more, and consume less, inflation will be lower. And your savings and investments will grow more in real value.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Az_Iz Mar 09, 2024 09:27pm
@Rational Economics,savings and inflation are opposites.Don't save, inflation will be that much higher.Save, and inflation will be that much lower.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Az_Iz Mar 09, 2024 09:29pm
@Rational Economics , the more a country saves, the lesser the inflation is going to be. And more likely a paisa will be two paisa tomorrow.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Az_Iz Mar 09, 2024 09:33pm
@Rational Economics ,savings takes lot of dedication, patience and sacrifices.You are always better off by saving,than spending it all.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Az_Iz Mar 09, 2024 09:43pm
In FY 20,exports and remittances were about $50 billion.In FY 22 and 23,they went up to about $65 to $70 billion.That is a significant increase.Yet the country needs to borrow a lot to pay for imports
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Az_Iz Mar 09, 2024 11:03pm
China,Indonesia,India,Bangladesh and Pakistan started out poor.They all followed what Jinnah said,saved around 30%,and surged ahead.Pakistan did not follow the advice,savings at 15% & got left behind.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Ashiq Faraz Mar 10, 2024 09:44pm
Misuse of power, dishonesty, Injustice, bureaucracy & incompetencies of rulers are putting this country on the list of the Poorest states in the world.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Tariq Qurashi Mar 11, 2024 10:00am
Pakistan has been having a grand time on borrowed money for years. The private sector was traditionally ignored. The party is now over. There is only one way out and that is to increase exports.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Make in Pakistan Mar 11, 2024 12:01pm
@Az_lz Agree with all what you said. We as a nation have not learnt anything about savings. Everyone wants 5 cups of tea every day with and iPhone in hand. Just two examples how import reliant we are!
thumb_up Recommended (0)