AIRLINK 72.59 Increased By ▲ 3.39 (4.9%)
BOP 4.99 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.84%)
CNERGY 4.29 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.7%)
DFML 31.71 Increased By ▲ 0.46 (1.47%)
DGKC 80.90 Increased By ▲ 3.65 (4.72%)
FCCL 21.42 Increased By ▲ 1.42 (7.1%)
FFBL 35.19 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (0.54%)
FFL 9.33 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (2.3%)
GGL 9.82 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.2%)
HBL 112.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-0.32%)
HUBC 136.50 Increased By ▲ 3.46 (2.6%)
HUMNL 7.14 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (2.73%)
KEL 4.35 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (2.84%)
KOSM 4.35 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (2.35%)
MLCF 37.67 Increased By ▲ 1.07 (2.92%)
OGDC 137.75 Increased By ▲ 4.88 (3.67%)
PAEL 23.41 Increased By ▲ 0.77 (3.4%)
PIAA 24.55 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (1.45%)
PIBTL 6.63 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (2.63%)
PPL 125.05 Increased By ▲ 8.75 (7.52%)
PRL 26.99 Increased By ▲ 1.09 (4.21%)
PTC 13.32 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (1.83%)
SEARL 52.70 Increased By ▲ 0.70 (1.35%)
SNGP 70.80 Increased By ▲ 3.20 (4.73%)
SSGC 10.54 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TELE 8.33 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.6%)
TPLP 10.95 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.39%)
TRG 60.60 Increased By ▲ 1.31 (2.21%)
UNITY 25.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.12%)
WTL 1.28 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.79%)
BR100 7,566 Increased By 157.7 (2.13%)
BR30 24,786 Increased By 749.4 (3.12%)
KSE100 71,902 Increased By 1235.2 (1.75%)
KSE30 23,595 Increased By 371 (1.6%)

ISLAMABAD: The Registrar Office Supreme Court, on Saturday, returned Chairman Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Imran Khan’s petition against the Islamabad High Court’s order dated 03-08-23.

The IHC had set aside the trial court’s verdict over the maintainability of the Toshakhana case against Imran Khan. It had also turned down the chairman PTI’s appeal to transfer the case to another court and remanded the matter to the trial court to decide it afresh.

Khawaja Haris Ahmed, on behalf of Imran Khan, on Saturday, filed the appeal against the IHC’s order, and requested the apex court to direct that the proceedings before the trial shall remain suspended.

He raised objection that Chief Justice IHC Aamir Farooq in remanding the case to the trial judge has misconstrued the submission made as he had argued that the case be remanded to any judge other than the judge, who had passed the order impugned in the IHC on the grounds other than bias.

He submitted that the IHC has seriously erred in law in remanding the case to the same judge who had earlier passed the order in a “cursory and shoddy” manner, and had already disclosed his mind qua the objections raised before him.

The single judge erred in not placing reliance on and following the dictum laid down by this Court in judgement reported as PLD 1960 SC 18.

The judgments relied upon by the single judge in refusing to remand the matter for decision afresh to a judge other than the judge had passed in the order impugned in Criminal Revision Petition No 108/2023 are wholly inapplicable on law and facts to the instant case and as such, the impugned judgment of the IHC is not warranted by the law.

The manner in which the impugned order was passed by the single judge of the IHC is in breach of the fundamental rights of the petitioner.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Comments

Comments are closed.