AIRLINK 61.49 Increased By ▲ 2.99 (5.11%)
BOP 6.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.16%)
CNERGY 4.15 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (4.8%)
DFML 16.24 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (1.44%)
DGKC 67.47 Decreased By ▼ -1.08 (-1.58%)
FCCL 17.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.06%)
FFBL 25.62 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.47%)
FFL 9.24 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.43%)
GGL 10.02 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (2.24%)
HBL 114.75 Increased By ▲ 0.75 (0.66%)
HUBC 112.57 Increased By ▲ 0.72 (0.64%)
HUMNL 6.61 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.23%)
KEL 4.44 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.6%)
KOSM 4.57 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.44%)
MLCF 38.02 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (0.58%)
OGDC 125.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.43 (-0.34%)
PAEL 22.53 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.09%)
PIAA 11.13 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PIBTL 6.48 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (4.85%)
PPL 108.21 Decreased By ▼ -0.79 (-0.72%)
PRL 27.91 Increased By ▲ 1.10 (4.1%)
PTC 10.78 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (2.18%)
SEARL 52.86 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.3%)
SNGP 66.57 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (0.33%)
SSGC 11.39 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (3.36%)
TELE 7.22 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.12%)
TPLP 11.91 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.75%)
TRG 77.93 Increased By ▲ 1.48 (1.94%)
UNITY 21.91 Increased By ▲ 1.50 (7.35%)
WTL 1.31 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BR100 6,499 Increased By 58.4 (0.91%)
BR30 22,266 Increased By 167.8 (0.76%)
KSE100 63,306 Increased By 490.1 (0.78%)
KSE30 21,296 Increased By 162.7 (0.77%)

A big thank you to my sister in Seattle for pointing out that Google translator translates ‘istehkam’ as ‘establishment’, but it’s unlikely that the English name for the newest political party in town will carry this word. Because it doesn’t need to.

And a frustrated Imran Khan trying to turn the tables on the establishment, for finally taking the wind out of his party, would do better to dwell on the time when the same establishment employed the same kingmaker, not more than one electoral cycle ago, to jet the same electables into PTI (Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf) that now continue to desert him and swell the ranks of Istehkam-e-Pakistan Party.

That tells you something about this establishment, doesn’t it, especially if you buy the dominant narrative on the ground, mostly PTI-driven, that the military didn’t keep its word of distancing itself from politics? But why’s nobody talking about what it says about politicians, especially the lot that was busy prizing away true power from the clutch of the military and delivering true freedom, haqeeqi azadi, to the people? “Tera baap bhi day ga azadi,” and all that?

How is it that pretty much the same bunch manages to gather around the blue-eyed boy of the time whenever Pakistanis need a new Pakistan? There was a time when the familiar bunch flocked to Nawaz Sharif when IJI (Islami Jamhoori Ittehad) fought, first unsuccessfully, against the state being taken over by a foreign-influenced family and, worst of all, a woman.

Years later, the usual suspects lent unwavering support to General Musharraf’s sub sey pehlay Pakistan crusade, even claimed that he needed to keep his uniform to strengthen the democratic setup. Then, after a few more rounds of musical chairs, a lot of the same champions of democracy flew first-class, on Jahangir Tareen’s plane, to wage “jihad” for Imran Khan’s Naya Pakistan.

The latest chapter of this long story is the most interesting, and instructive, one. The rush to Imran – when almost all pieces of the puzzle had fallen into place, especially after Nawaz was disqualified, again! – was the call of conscience. The military, too, was suddenly celebrated as democratic, and General Bajwa dubbed the most “democratic general” by none other than the self-styled khalifa of the would-be “Riyasat-e-Madina” himself.

Between then and now, we did break a lot of fresh ground. Stung by his fall, Imran lashed out at anybody and everybody that didn’t agree 100 percent with him, and threw everything the thesaurus had under Mir Jaffar and Mir Sadiq at the army high command, finally provoking his legions of followers, on 9 May 2023, to bite the hand that fed him the premiership less than five years ago. And then democracy’s mujahideen started showing up, in hordes, at the istehkam, or establishment, party.

PTI’s trying to keep face by describing the flight of “migratory birds” as “good riddance”, since now it knows the difference between true believers in Imran’s Riyasat-e-Madina and those whose jihad was limited to stealing his spotlight.

But it hasn’t yet explained how the leader who always knows everything better than the rest of the world, quite literally, chose to fill his kitchen cabinet with political opportunists whose resumes boasted nothing more than foul-mouthed rhetoric that pleased their former masters; till they deserted them for more promising democratic pastures, of course. No word on why the chairman was smiling ear-to-ear when they were coming his way, especially when their profanity was directed at his opponents.

Now, whether you love them or hate them or are part of them or not, these turncoats that make our political elite will dominate the headlines all the way to the next elections, at least. You could, and no doubt should, call out the establishment for its unending puppeteering, but also consider if it would really be able to pull almost everybody’s strings so easily if democratic parties, all of them, weren’t littered with political courtesans?

Remember, we’re still waiting for progressive, educated Pakistanis to enter the political mainstream, even after seven-and-a-half decades, because political parties, not the military, only allow the rich, powerful and influential into their fold; and even from them, mostly feudal lords and industrial barons are awarded tickets because they have the money to throw into election campaigns. If you talk to the middle class, like journalists do, they’ll tell you why they’d rather leave the polarised, paralysed, decaying and defaulting country than wait any longer for Godot.

So, as legitimate as criticising the establishment for its interference is – especially when it trends on twitter and makes money for your vlogs – wouldn’t it have a lot more weight, and validity, if the democrats and politicians we value so much also had at least an ounce of credibility?

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023


Comments are closed.

Masud Canada Jun 22, 2023 07:21am
Let us wait and see how people vote this time around. All our opinions , prejudices , premises and mental baggage we carry in our thought process will be voted out or voted in. I am anticipating a change.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
KU Jun 22, 2023 10:44am
Tragedy is at play and a script with the same characters is trying to entertain unsuccessfully, and the loser is Pakistan. The objective of deception is always for personal gratification, and our imperfect system allows it under the large nose of the law. There is no hope especially when clear and present dangers to the people's welfare and survival are ignored and dynastic rule is the focus. But then why are we even talking about the woes of our political and economic system, don’t we know that we have the ability to defy change, which supposedly is the only constant?
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Qasim Jun 23, 2023 10:49am
Good article... The conclusion one must draw from this is that the whole political system in Pakistan is seriously flawed. I don't see any of the present leadership in ay party really doing anything to fix this because at one point or another it serves them. Unfortunately it doesn't serve the people..
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Wasif Jun 23, 2023 12:08pm
Good article and very well written. I always think this is a power triangle of establishment - Political Elite - judicial elite. at any given time one faction of of the triangle has a battle with some other but together they are a strong shape and unbreakable from the outside. only agenda of the triangle members is to serve themselves and protect the triangle at all cost.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Whether it is the establishment calling the shots, the fact remains that political parties failed in their governance when they had the chance
thumb_up Recommended (0)