AIRLINK 72.59 Increased By ▲ 3.39 (4.9%)
BOP 4.99 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.84%)
CNERGY 4.29 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.7%)
DFML 31.71 Increased By ▲ 0.46 (1.47%)
DGKC 80.90 Increased By ▲ 3.65 (4.72%)
FCCL 21.42 Increased By ▲ 1.42 (7.1%)
FFBL 35.19 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (0.54%)
FFL 9.33 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (2.3%)
GGL 9.82 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.2%)
HBL 112.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-0.32%)
HUBC 136.50 Increased By ▲ 3.46 (2.6%)
HUMNL 7.14 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (2.73%)
KEL 4.35 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (2.84%)
KOSM 4.35 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (2.35%)
MLCF 37.67 Increased By ▲ 1.07 (2.92%)
OGDC 137.75 Increased By ▲ 4.88 (3.67%)
PAEL 23.41 Increased By ▲ 0.77 (3.4%)
PIAA 24.55 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (1.45%)
PIBTL 6.63 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (2.63%)
PPL 125.05 Increased By ▲ 8.75 (7.52%)
PRL 26.99 Increased By ▲ 1.09 (4.21%)
PTC 13.32 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (1.83%)
SEARL 52.70 Increased By ▲ 0.70 (1.35%)
SNGP 70.80 Increased By ▲ 3.20 (4.73%)
SSGC 10.54 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TELE 8.33 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.6%)
TPLP 10.95 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.39%)
TRG 60.60 Increased By ▲ 1.31 (2.21%)
UNITY 25.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.12%)
WTL 1.28 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.79%)
BR100 7,566 Increased By 157.7 (2.13%)
BR30 24,786 Increased By 749.4 (3.12%)
KSE100 71,902 Increased By 1235.2 (1.75%)
KSE30 23,595 Increased By 371 (1.6%)

For a bilateral relationship already suffering from a ton of historical baggage, mistrust and missed opportunities, two major events this month have ensured that the ties will remain frozen in place, for the foreseeable future. With both countries set to go into elections within a year’s time, few could seriously hope for a major breakthrough in the Indo-Pak equation. In the interim, however, opportunities to lower the temperature should be utilized – something which is really not happening.

The first missed opportunity was the Pakistani Foreign Minister’s visit to Goa (India) to attend the SCO’s ministerial conference and his Indian counterpart’s visibly-cold reception and biting remarks afterwards. To show the regional powers (mainly China and Russia) that they were committed to the SCO’s platform, India invited the Pakistani FM (but chose to later give him a cold shoulder), and the Pakistani side also showed maturity to attend at the highest level (despite tensions with India and facing no tangible upside).

While the much-more experienced Indian foreign minister’s undiplomatic attitude towards FM Bilawal can be attributed mainly to the latter’s scathing remarks about Indian PM Modi not so long ago, it showed India’s diplomacy in a poor light despite hosting a major regional summit. Much more cool and composed, the Pakistani FM went through the summit formalities with relative ease. He also caught quite a lot of diplomatic and media spotlight, which seemed to further frustrate his host, resulting in some outbursts.

The result of such poor optics is that not only are the two establishments drifting further apart, their respective positions are also appearing to harden, with no intermediary in sight to urge caution. After a hopeful pause in rhetoric, the Pakistani side has again started to link resumption of talks with India reversing its August 2019 Kashmir annexation. The Indian side, despite witnessing Pakistan getting off of the FATF grey list and facing economic and security crises, has again dialed up the ‘stop terrorism’ tone.

The other missed opportunity is in ‘Cricket,’ which has traditionally offered diplomatic respite in difficult circumstances over past decades. While major international teams have been touring Pakistan for some years now, India is reportedly refusing to send its team to participate in the Asia Cup happening later this year in September in Pakistan. After trying hard to make India’s BCCI change its mind, Pakistan’s PCB sees little option but to boycott its own matches in India-hosted World Cup a few months after.

With no confidence-building measures in sight and as highly-partisan elections approach (especially in India), the deteriorating diplomacy potentially raises the stakes in case events like February 2019 bring both countries to direct confrontation again. The two nuclear-armed neighbors, having fought several wars, cannot afford any miscalculations. Therefore, it is important to at least pause the diplomatic salvos for now and hope for better days to come when the two countries can sit together and improve relations.

Comments

Comments are closed.

Sumroo May 18, 2023 08:45am
Like 1971 egoistic generals and Waderas will bulldoze democracy to save threir rule!
thumb_up Recommended (0)
TimeToMovveOn May 18, 2023 05:06pm
"despite witnessing Pakistan getting off of the FATF grey list-"-You think we are fools? India colluded with the west to put Pakistan on the FATF so that it can pressure Pakistan to prosecute the 26/11 terrorists. Before every FATF meeting Pakistan would put one UN designated Indian centric terrorist in the jail. The same terrorist that was roaming free before. ONly after 4 or 5 of them were sent t jail, that India let Pakistan off of FATF. Without India using FATF as a political stick Pakistan would have done nothing. Getting off of FATF is nothing to appease us. They question for India is should we take chance for another 26/11. NOoooooo. We are fine without Pakistan. We dont want to lose our guard and have another 26/11 happen. We are progressing with you. We dont want anything to do with Pakistan. We are not fools.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
TimeToMovveOn May 18, 2023 05:27pm
What does India get by giving any diplomatic breathing space to Pakistan? Our strategy is to keep Pakistan so occupied so that it does not even have any chance to get momentum on Kashmir. India's goal is to keep Kashmir at any cost (we can get away with Hr abuses, just like China and Russia getaway). So why even give Pak any air gap. Let Pak talk about the SCO fall out, that will send a strong signal to the world that India is not interested in talking about Kashmir. This is what India wants. What is wrong with it. What do we get by handling over Kashmir to Pakistan. What is our dividend?
thumb_up Recommended (0)
KU May 18, 2023 08:44pm
Both countries are big losers in ideological quagmire and foolishly ignoring a fact. Probably 10 or 15 years from now, chaos resulting from climate change will have a devastating effect on the people of the region and both countries will regret not spending enough money or resources in preparation to face this chaos. The leadership should look around and learn from the developed countries on how they are mitigating climate change and preparing for the imminent change in agriculture, employment, and health of their citizens. But knowing our leadership's mindset, we can safely assume that more of the same ideology and propaganda will continue, while the time leading to armageddon will be hidden from people.
thumb_up Recommended (0)