AIRLINK 72.00 Decreased By ▼ -2.10 (-2.83%)
BOP 5.02 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.4%)
CNERGY 4.40 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (1.38%)
DFML 29.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.44 (-1.49%)
DGKC 83.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.39 (-0.47%)
FCCL 22.37 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.27%)
FFBL 34.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.60 (-1.72%)
FFL 10.13 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (2.63%)
GGL 10.22 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (2.2%)
HBL 113.40 Increased By ▲ 1.40 (1.25%)
HUBC 140.89 Increased By ▲ 3.20 (2.32%)
HUMNL 8.03 Increased By ▲ 1.05 (15.04%)
KEL 4.43 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.68%)
KOSM 4.56 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.65%)
MLCF 38.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.26%)
OGDC 135.25 Decreased By ▼ -1.35 (-0.99%)
PAEL 26.90 Increased By ▲ 1.76 (7%)
PIAA 25.94 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-2.15%)
PIBTL 6.53 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.8%)
PPL 122.62 Decreased By ▼ -2.78 (-2.22%)
PRL 28.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.07%)
PTC 13.98 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-2.24%)
SEARL 55.50 Increased By ▲ 0.90 (1.65%)
SNGP 70.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.80 (-1.12%)
SSGC 10.49 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.1%)
TELE 8.60 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.94%)
TPLP 11.06 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.1%)
TRG 61.60 Increased By ▲ 0.90 (1.48%)
UNITY 25.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.2%)
WTL 1.29 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (2.38%)
BR100 7,660 Decreased By -4.5 (-0.06%)
BR30 25,113 Increased By 87.1 (0.35%)
KSE100 73,126 Increased By 362 (0.5%)
KSE30 23,746 Decreased By -29.1 (-0.12%)

LAHORE: A division bench of the Lahore High Court (LHC) would proceed with a petition of PTI Chairman Imran Khan on March 13 challenging ban imposed by the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (Pemra) on the broadcast of his speeches and press talks on the television channels.

Justice Shams Mahmood Mirza on March 09 had suspended the impugned order and referred the petition to Chief Justice for its disposal by any larger bench.

The Chief Justice constituted the division bench for disposal of the petition in accordance with the law.

Pemra had slapped the ban after Imran lashed out at former army Chief Qamar Javed Bajwa for what he called, protecting incumbent rulers in their alleged corruption cases.

The petitioner through his counsel argued that the Pemra had issued the impugned order without having regard to the constitutional rights guaranteed under Articles 19 and 19-A of the Constitution.

He said a plain reading of section 27 of the Pemra ordinance, prima facie, showed that it did not empower the authority to issue a blanket prohibition order. He said the prohibition order appeared to be in violation of the principle of proportionality.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Comments

Comments are closed.