ISLAMABAD: The appointment of Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court’s judges was challenged in the Supreme Court contending these appointments were made in violation of the GB Order 2018 and Rules of Business 2009.
Chief Minister Gilgit-Baltistan Khalid Khursheed Khan and the GB government through Secretary Law and Prosecution Department on Wednesday filed a constitutional petition under Article 184(3) of the Constitution in the Supreme Court and cited the federation through the Secretary Ministry of Kashmir Affairs, Secretary Ministry of Law and Justice, and Governor Syed Mehdi Shah as respondents.
They have prayed to the apex court to declare the GB Governor (Respondent No 2) had no lawful authority to advise the Prime Minister (Respondent No 1) for the appointment of Javed Ahmed (Respondent No 3) as Judge of GB Chief Court for one year and to extend the appointment of Justice Malik Inayatur Rehman, Justice Johar Ali Khan and Justice Raja Shakeel Ahmed – judges of Chief Court – for one year.
They contended that the prime minister of Pakistan and the GB governor acted in violation of the Gilgit-Baltistan Government Order 2018 read with the Gilgit-Baltistan Rules of Business, 2009.
“Declare the impugned appointment notification dated 16.09.2022 as without lawful authority and of no legal effect, quash it and consequently the appointment of Respondent No 3 as a judge of Chief Court Gilgit-Baltistan.”
“Direct the federal government to forthwith issue a fresh notification for confirmation of Justice Malik Inayatur Rehman, Justice Johar Ali Khan and Justice Raja Shakeel Ahmed as the judges of Chief Court, with effect from 16.09.2022.”
“Prohibit the Prime Minister and GB Governor from making any new appointments of Chief Judge or Judge(s) of Supreme Appellate Court and the Chief Court of Gilgit-Baltistan without prior advice of the Chief Minister and/ or Cabinet of Gilgit-Baltistan.”
GB Governor Mehdi Shah on 13.09.2022 sent a summary to Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif for the appointment of a judge of the Chief Court. He recommended three names, including respondent No 3. Consequently, on 16-09-22 a notification for the appointment of Javed Ahmed as the judge of Chief Court was for an initial period of one year.
Similarly, the GB Chief Minister on 20-07-22 sent a summary to the governor for the confirmation of the appointment of Justice Malik Inayatur Rehman, Justice Johar Ali Khan, and Justice Raja Shakeel Ahmed. The governor accordingly advised the prime minister on 04-08-22. However, the prime minister instead of confirming them extended their term for another year.
The petitioners contended that the prime minister by not following the advice of the governor acted in contravention of Article 84 of the Order 2018.
The executive authority and discretion of the governor and the prime minister in the appointment of judges of the Supreme Appellate Court and Chief Court of Gilgit-Baltistan are controlled by Articles 75 and 84 read with Article 34 of the Order 2018.
They submitted that without being first advised by the Chief Minister (Petitioner No1) or Cabinet, under Article 34 of the Order 2018, the Governor (Respondent No2) had no authority to advise the Prime Minister to appoint Respondent No3 as Judge of Chief Court of Gilgit-Baltistan. Therefore, the action of the GB Governor in the appointment of Javed Ahmed suffers both from malice in fact and in law and is completely without lawful authority and of no legal effect.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2022
Comments
Comments are closed.