AIRLINK 72.59 Increased By ▲ 3.39 (4.9%)
BOP 4.99 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.84%)
CNERGY 4.29 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.7%)
DFML 31.71 Increased By ▲ 0.46 (1.47%)
DGKC 80.90 Increased By ▲ 3.65 (4.72%)
FCCL 21.42 Increased By ▲ 1.42 (7.1%)
FFBL 35.19 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (0.54%)
FFL 9.33 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (2.3%)
GGL 9.82 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.2%)
HBL 112.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-0.32%)
HUBC 136.50 Increased By ▲ 3.46 (2.6%)
HUMNL 7.14 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (2.73%)
KEL 4.35 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (2.84%)
KOSM 4.35 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (2.35%)
MLCF 37.67 Increased By ▲ 1.07 (2.92%)
OGDC 137.75 Increased By ▲ 4.88 (3.67%)
PAEL 23.41 Increased By ▲ 0.77 (3.4%)
PIAA 24.55 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (1.45%)
PIBTL 6.63 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (2.63%)
PPL 125.05 Increased By ▲ 8.75 (7.52%)
PRL 26.99 Increased By ▲ 1.09 (4.21%)
PTC 13.32 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (1.83%)
SEARL 52.70 Increased By ▲ 0.70 (1.35%)
SNGP 70.80 Increased By ▲ 3.20 (4.73%)
SSGC 10.54 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TELE 8.33 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.6%)
TPLP 10.95 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.39%)
TRG 60.60 Increased By ▲ 1.31 (2.21%)
UNITY 25.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.12%)
WTL 1.28 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.79%)
BR100 7,566 Increased By 157.7 (2.13%)
BR30 24,786 Increased By 749.4 (3.12%)
KSE100 71,902 Increased By 1235.2 (1.75%)
KSE30 23,595 Increased By 371 (1.6%)

The National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (NEPRA) on Tuesday informed the Sindh High Court (SHC) that issue of Industrial Support Package (ISP) does not fall under its purview, and it pertains to the federal government.

NEPRA stated this in its reply submitted against a petition moved by industrialists against industrial support adjustment surcharge (ISAP) in their electricity bills, which the court had ordered not be charged until the petition is decided.

NEPRA, one of the respondents in the petition, contended that the issue of ISP pertains to the government of Pakistan and does not fall within the purview of NEPRA as SRO No. 12 (1)/2019 dated 1st January 2019, SRO No. 810 (1)/2019 dated 12th July 2019, corrigendum dated 22nd January 2020 were issued by the federal government without intimation to NEPRA.

NEPRA argued that the constitutional petition is not maintainable in its present form, and there is no cause of action against NEPRA as question of grant of subsidy or withdrawal of the subsidy squarely rest with the federal government.

As this is a prerogative of the federal government and fall under their discretion, hence NEPRA out of its own cannot grant or deny the subsidy in favour of any entity, the authority stated. Since ISPA is a subsidy/relief provided by the federal government, therefore, NEPRA has no concern on levy of ISPA, it maintained. NEPRA contended that the petition is not maintainable in its present form as factual controversies have been raised by the petitioner, which cannot be gone into in exercise of extraordinary constitutional jurisdiction and stated that the petition is liable to be dismissed because the petitioner has no cause of action whatsoever against the respondent.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2020

Comments

Comments are closed.