AIRLINK 72.59 Increased By ▲ 3.39 (4.9%)
BOP 4.99 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.84%)
CNERGY 4.29 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.7%)
DFML 31.71 Increased By ▲ 0.46 (1.47%)
DGKC 80.90 Increased By ▲ 3.65 (4.72%)
FCCL 21.42 Increased By ▲ 1.42 (7.1%)
FFBL 35.19 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (0.54%)
FFL 9.33 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (2.3%)
GGL 9.82 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.2%)
HBL 112.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-0.32%)
HUBC 136.50 Increased By ▲ 3.46 (2.6%)
HUMNL 7.14 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (2.73%)
KEL 4.35 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (2.84%)
KOSM 4.35 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (2.35%)
MLCF 37.67 Increased By ▲ 1.07 (2.92%)
OGDC 137.75 Increased By ▲ 4.88 (3.67%)
PAEL 23.41 Increased By ▲ 0.77 (3.4%)
PIAA 24.55 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (1.45%)
PIBTL 6.63 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (2.63%)
PPL 125.05 Increased By ▲ 8.75 (7.52%)
PRL 26.99 Increased By ▲ 1.09 (4.21%)
PTC 13.32 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (1.83%)
SEARL 52.70 Increased By ▲ 0.70 (1.35%)
SNGP 70.80 Increased By ▲ 3.20 (4.73%)
SSGC 10.54 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TELE 8.33 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.6%)
TPLP 10.95 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.39%)
TRG 60.60 Increased By ▲ 1.31 (2.21%)
UNITY 25.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.12%)
WTL 1.28 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.79%)
BR100 7,566 Increased By 157.7 (2.13%)
BR30 24,786 Increased By 749.4 (3.12%)
KSE100 71,902 Increased By 1235.2 (1.75%)
KSE30 23,595 Increased By 371 (1.6%)

The recently unveiled budget has put in words the worst fear of the textile sector. The zero-rated status given to the sector under SRO 1125 has been taken away. All the SOS appeals in newspapers coupled with the countless meetings of textile associations with the government could not stop this from passing.

So what has all the hue and cry been about? Since 2011, the textile industry along with leather, carpets, sports goods and the surgical instruments sector has enjoyed zero-rated status on both inputs as well as finished products. This has allowed them to forego depositing sales tax under the "no payment, no refund" mantra proposed by the textile industry and adopted as part of the incentive package rolled out by the government.

It is difficult to quantitatively assess the impact of the refund policy on textile exports as no study has been done on the subject. However, one primary objective was to ease the liquidity for exporters who saw refunds stuck for years before payment was processed by the government.

Till date, the textile sector claims that almost Rs200 billion is still to be processed by the government while official figures of the Textile Ministry put it at Rs100 billion. The PTI government has decided to issue promissory notes for settlement of the approved pending claims in light of the fiscal constraints.

However, the process has kicked off only recently and the backlog remains substantial. The textile industry argues that with the removal of the zero rating schemes, this backlog will only increase.

Even though the government has made assurances during the budget speech that refund payment orders (RPOs) will immediately be sent to the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) for processing, exporters are not hopeful of prompt refunds, which they claim get delayed due to a lack of fiscal space.

The government's main rationale for abolishing the scheme is that it has been used by textile firms to evade payment of sales tax on domestic sales. According to Hammad Azhar, the Revenue Minster for State, tax collection on domestic sales of Rs1.5 trillion was only Rs12 billion, an area which cannot be ignored if the government is to meet its ambitious revenue targets for the year.

Be that as it may, the move does not bode well for exporters given that delayed refund processing will affect liquidity and in turn order processing for export firms. The rupee depreciation and the rise in cost of production are already keeping exports in check and the removal of the zero-rated treatment might likely result in a fall in textile exports in the coming year.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2019

Comments

Comments are closed.