AIRLINK 76.15 Increased By ▲ 1.75 (2.35%)
BOP 4.86 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-1.82%)
CNERGY 4.31 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.69%)
DFML 46.65 Increased By ▲ 1.92 (4.29%)
DGKC 89.25 Increased By ▲ 1.98 (2.27%)
FCCL 23.48 Increased By ▲ 0.58 (2.53%)
FFBL 33.36 Increased By ▲ 1.71 (5.4%)
FFL 9.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.11%)
GGL 10.10 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
HASCOL 6.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.62%)
HBL 113.77 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (0.15%)
HUBC 143.90 Increased By ▲ 3.75 (2.68%)
HUMNL 11.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.5%)
KEL 4.99 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (2.46%)
KOSM 4.40 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
MLCF 38.50 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.26%)
OGDC 133.70 Increased By ▲ 0.90 (0.68%)
PAEL 25.39 Increased By ▲ 0.94 (3.84%)
PIBTL 6.75 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (3.37%)
PPL 120.01 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (0.31%)
PRL 26.16 Increased By ▲ 0.28 (1.08%)
PTC 13.89 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.02%)
SEARL 57.50 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (0.44%)
SNGP 66.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.15%)
SSGC 10.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.49%)
TELE 8.10 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.89%)
TPLP 10.61 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.28%)
TRG 62.80 Increased By ▲ 1.14 (1.85%)
UNITY 26.95 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (1.2%)
WTL 1.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.47%)
BR100 7,957 Increased By 122.2 (1.56%)
BR30 25,700 Increased By 369.8 (1.46%)
KSE100 75,878 Increased By 1000.4 (1.34%)
KSE30 24,343 Increased By 355.2 (1.48%)

The Commissioner Inland Revenue would have the authority to issue orders to the taxpayers for conducting manual post-refund scrutiny of claims against inadmissible sales tax refunds paid after June 30, 2014. The FBR has amended Sales Tax Rules, 2006 through an SRO 1320(1)/2018 issued here on Friday.
According to the FBR, where the Commissioner Inland Revenue has reason to believe, on the basis of some information, pre-determined criteria or otherwise, that a registered person whose refund claim was processed or sanctioned after the 30th June, 2014, has been paid refund which was not admissible, he may direct through order in writing to conduct manual post-refund scrutiny of such claim, the SRO added.
Earlier, where the Commissioner Inland Revenue has reasons to believe that a registered person whose refund claim was processed or sanctioned after the 30th June, 2014, has been paid refund which was not admissible to him, he may direct through order in writing to conduct computerized Post Refund Scrutiny (PRS) of such claim.
Following is the text of the notification issued here on Friday: SRO 1320(1)/2018.- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (I) of section 4, section 40 and section 45A of the Federal Excise Act, 2005, section 219 of the Customs Act, 1969 (IV of 1969), section 50 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, read with sub-section (2) of section 8, clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 8, clause (ii) of sub-section (2) of section 8B, sections 9, 10, 14, 21, 21A and 28, clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 22, first proviso to sub-section (1) of section 23, section 26, section 33, section 40C, sub-section (6) of section 47A, sections 48, 50A, 52, 52A and 66 thereof, the Federal Board of Revenue is pleased to direct that the following further amendments shall be made in the Sales Tax Rules, 2006, namely:-
In the aforesaid Rules
(a) in rule 26A, in sub-rule (8), for the second proviso, the following shall be substituted, namely:-
"Provided further that where the Commissioner Inland Revenue has reason to believe, on the basis of some information, pre-determined criteria or otherwise, that a registered person, whose refund claim was processed or sanctioned after the 30th June, 2014, has been paid refund which was not admissible, he may direct through order in writing to conduct manual post-refund scrutiny of such claim."; and
(b) in rule 36, in sub-rule (1), for second proviso, the following shall be substituted,
namely:-
"Provided further that where the Commissioner Inland Revenue has reason to believe, on the basis of some information, pre-determined criteria or otherwise, that a registered person, whose refund claim was processed or sanctioned after the 30th June, 2014, has been paid refund which was not admissible, he may direct through order in writing to conduct manual post-refund scrutiny of such claim."

Copyright Business Recorder, 2018

Comments

Comments are closed.