AIRLINK 177.95 Decreased By ▼ -2.41 (-1.34%)
BOP 11.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.18%)
CNERGY 8.52 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.12%)
CPHL 96.35 Decreased By ▼ -4.06 (-4.04%)
FCCL 45.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.81 (-1.76%)
FFL 15.91 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.63%)
FLYNG 28.00 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.39%)
HUBC 141.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.82 (-0.58%)
HUMNL 13.05 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.31%)
KEL 4.46 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-1.33%)
KOSM 5.85 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.17%)
MLCF 60.82 Decreased By ▼ -1.08 (-1.74%)
OGDC 211.50 Decreased By ▼ -2.82 (-1.32%)
PACE 5.76 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-2.7%)
PAEL 46.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.28 (-0.6%)
PIAHCLA 17.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.33 (-1.85%)
PIBTL 10.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.13%)
POWER 11.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.33 (-2.71%)
PPL 169.49 Decreased By ▼ -3.22 (-1.86%)
PRL 34.50 Decreased By ▼ -1.52 (-4.22%)
PTC 22.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.76 (-3.27%)
SEARL 93.55 Decreased By ▼ -2.51 (-2.61%)
SSGC 39.56 Decreased By ▼ -1.78 (-4.31%)
SYM 14.45 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.07%)
TELE 7.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.68%)
TPLP 10.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.79%)
TRG 65.81 Decreased By ▼ -2.09 (-3.08%)
WAVESAPP 10.32 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (3.2%)
WTL 1.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.75%)
YOUW 3.83 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.52%)
AIRLINK 177.95 Decreased By ▼ -2.41 (-1.34%)
BOP 11.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.18%)
CNERGY 8.52 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.12%)
CPHL 96.35 Decreased By ▼ -4.06 (-4.04%)
FCCL 45.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.81 (-1.76%)
FFL 15.91 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.63%)
FLYNG 28.00 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.39%)
HUBC 141.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.82 (-0.58%)
HUMNL 13.05 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.31%)
KEL 4.46 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-1.33%)
KOSM 5.85 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.17%)
MLCF 60.82 Decreased By ▼ -1.08 (-1.74%)
OGDC 211.50 Decreased By ▼ -2.82 (-1.32%)
PACE 5.76 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-2.7%)
PAEL 46.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.28 (-0.6%)
PIAHCLA 17.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.33 (-1.85%)
PIBTL 10.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.13%)
POWER 11.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.33 (-2.71%)
PPL 169.49 Decreased By ▼ -3.22 (-1.86%)
PRL 34.50 Decreased By ▼ -1.52 (-4.22%)
PTC 22.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.76 (-3.27%)
SEARL 93.55 Decreased By ▼ -2.51 (-2.61%)
SSGC 39.56 Decreased By ▼ -1.78 (-4.31%)
SYM 14.45 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.07%)
TELE 7.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.68%)
TPLP 10.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.79%)
TRG 65.81 Decreased By ▼ -2.09 (-3.08%)
WAVESAPP 10.32 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (3.2%)
WTL 1.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.75%)
YOUW 3.83 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.52%)
BR100 12,356 Decreased By -124.5 (-1%)
BR30 37,420 Decreased By -588 (-1.55%)
KSE100 116,020 Decreased By -755.4 (-0.65%)
KSE30 35,606 Decreased By -242.8 (-0.68%)

LAHORE: A State-Owned Enterprise (SOE) has challenged a blatant disregard for the law by the tax department for adopting coercive measures against it, issuing recovery notices without following the mandatory procedure of constituting an Alternative Dispute Resolution Committee (ADRC).

The SOE had approached the relevant appellate forum, seeking a direction against the department to refrain from initiating or taking any coercive recovery measures in respect of default surcharge amount against it till the constitution of the ARDC.

The Income Tax Ordinance 2001 explicitly requires the tax authorities to constitute an ADRC to resolve disputes with state-owned enterprises. However, the tax department has been flouting this provision, resorting to strong-arm tactics to recover taxes.

The appellate forum maintained that it is not in dispute that pursuant to Section 134-A of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, read with Section 47A(2) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, duly amended by Finance Act, 2024, a mechanism has been provided for SOE to approach FBR in respect of adverse orders passed by the Inland Revenue Department under both these fiscal laws. The most significant and the relevant amendment made, which is fully applicable to the dispute, is that now it is mandatory for SOE to go for ADR, whereas the limit of Rs50 million is also not applicable. Earlier, the management of an SOE was reluctant to go for mediation in any business transaction due to fear of prosecution, but through newly amended provisions, they have been protected from any suit, prosecution or other legal proceedings. Since referral to ADR is now mandatory for SOE, a right to appeal has also been provided to SOE when matter is not decided by ADRC within the stipulated period.

The affected state-owned enterprises have been left with no choice but to approach the courts, seeking relief against the unlawful actions of the tax department. The courts have taken a dim view of the tax department’s actions, directing them to withdraw the recovery notices and follow the due process of law.

Tax experts are of the view that it is imperative that the tax department respects the law and follows the established procedures to avoid such confrontations in the future.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Comments

Comments are closed.