AIRLINK 164.00 Decreased By ▼ -1.36 (-0.82%)
BOP 10.58 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (1.83%)
CNERGY 8.40 Increased By ▲ 0.57 (7.28%)
FCCL 47.24 Increased By ▲ 1.59 (3.48%)
FFL 15.30 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (1.19%)
FLYNG 26.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.11%)
HUBC 137.19 Increased By ▲ 1.91 (1.41%)
HUMNL 12.99 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.09%)
KEL 4.30 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (2.63%)
KOSM 5.63 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (2.93%)
MLCF 60.80 Increased By ▲ 1.37 (2.31%)
OGDC 215.60 Increased By ▲ 2.53 (1.19%)
PACE 5.54 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (2.4%)
PAEL 41.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-0.29%)
PIAHCLA 17.65 Increased By ▲ 0.60 (3.52%)
PIBTL 10.22 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (2.92%)
POWER 11.88 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.76%)
PPL 174.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-0.06%)
PRL 35.65 Increased By ▲ 1.29 (3.75%)
PTC 22.95 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (1.1%)
SEARL 95.08 Increased By ▲ 1.33 (1.42%)
SSGC 36.47 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (1%)
SYM 14.00 Increased By ▲ 0.52 (3.86%)
TELE 7.27 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (2.11%)
TPLP 10.25 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.39%)
TRG 61.93 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (1.64%)
WAVESAPP 10.39 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.07%)
WTL 1.31 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (2.34%)
YOUW 3.72 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.54%)
BR100 12,388 Increased By 74.4 (0.6%)
BR30 36,995 Increased By 487.9 (1.34%)
KSE100 115,532 Increased By 623 (0.54%)
KSE30 35,662 Increased By 120.4 (0.34%)

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court (LHC) held that the Ministry of Industries has no jurisdiction to transfer the technical and non-technical officers of BPS-18 to 19 of the Pakistan Industrial Technical Assistance Centre (PITAC).

The court observed that under clause 59 of the PITAC Rules and Regulations of 1962, the power to transfer the officers lies with the executive committee of PITAC.

The court passed this order in a petition of Muhammad Imran challenging his transfer in compliance of the direction of the ministry.

The petitioner was transferred from the post of deputy director (Marketing) in Lahore to PITAC Regional Centre (RC), Quetta as Regional Manager RC.

The petitioner’s counsel submitted that under the relevant rules, the authority to transfer the officers in PITAC lies with the executive committee of PITAC and the ministry has no role in the matter.

In response to the question of maintainability of the petition, the counsel submitted that PITAC was an attached organisation of the ministry and its rules and regulations, 1962 were revised by the federal government in 2014; therefore, the said rules being statutory, this constitutional petition is maintainable.

The court after hearing the petitioner’s counsel at length observed that the impugned transfer order passed in compliance with the direction of the ministry is patently without jurisdiction and hence is not sustainable. The court observed that though there are allegations and counter-allegations by respective parties in this petition and in response thereto; however, as the impugned order is found to be without jurisdiction, therefore, this constitutional petition is allowed.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.