AIRLINK 74.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-0.34%)
BOP 5.14 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.78%)
CNERGY 4.55 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (2.94%)
DFML 37.15 Increased By ▲ 1.31 (3.66%)
DGKC 89.90 Increased By ▲ 1.90 (2.16%)
FCCL 22.40 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (0.9%)
FFBL 33.03 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (0.95%)
FFL 9.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.41%)
GGL 10.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.46%)
HBL 115.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.40 (-0.35%)
HUBC 137.10 Increased By ▲ 1.26 (0.93%)
HUMNL 9.95 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.12%)
KEL 4.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.22%)
KOSM 4.83 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (3.65%)
MLCF 39.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-0.33%)
OGDC 138.20 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (0.22%)
PAEL 27.00 Increased By ▲ 0.57 (2.16%)
PIAA 24.24 Decreased By ▼ -2.04 (-7.76%)
PIBTL 6.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.3%)
PPL 123.62 Increased By ▲ 0.72 (0.59%)
PRL 27.40 Increased By ▲ 0.71 (2.66%)
PTC 13.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.71%)
SEARL 61.75 Increased By ▲ 3.05 (5.2%)
SNGP 70.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-0.36%)
SSGC 10.52 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (1.54%)
TELE 8.57 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.12%)
TPLP 11.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.28 (-2.46%)
TRG 64.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.33%)
UNITY 26.76 Increased By ▲ 0.71 (2.73%)
WTL 1.38 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BR100 7,874 Increased By 36.2 (0.46%)
BR30 25,596 Increased By 136 (0.53%)
KSE100 75,342 Increased By 411.7 (0.55%)
KSE30 24,214 Increased By 68.6 (0.28%)

ISLAMABAD: The poll entity has indicted former prime minister Imran Khan and ex-Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) leader Fawad Chaudhry in the contempt case— at a time when the Commission is already facing sharp criticism from political and public circles, as well as legal fraternity, electoral watchdogs and human rights’ bodies over alleged denial of level playing field to political forces, the PTI in particular, for general elections.

Corresponding to the contempt trial, a four-member ECP bench visited Adiala Jail Rawalpindi on Wednesday to separately indict Khan and Chaudhry.

Nisar Ahmed Durrani, Shah Muhammad Jatoi, Babar Hassan Bharwana and former Justice Ikramullah Khan are part of the bench.

Khan’s counsel, during the proceedings of the case, informed the bench that Advocate Shoaib Shaheen, the former PM’s main defence lawyer, was in Supreme Court in connection with his related engagements. He requested the bench to defer the indictment till next hearing to allow Shaheen to appear before the bench.

However, the bench rejected this request and indicted Khan, besides indicting Chaudhry.

The counsels for both the politicians denied the contempt allegations when the charge-sheet was read out during the proceedings of the case.

Speaking to media outside Adiala Jail, PTI’s Advocate Ali Bukhari announced to challenge Khan’s indictment in high court.

Separately, Hiba Chaudhry, wife of Fawad Chaudhry, questioned the legality of the contempt proceedings. She said her husband objected to the presence of one of the members of Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP), against whom a reference is pending in the superior judiciary, in the bench. “But he is a member of this bench,” Hiba deplored.

Earlier on December 13, in an unprecedented development, the ECP bench, for the first time, visited Adiala Jail for conducting contempt proceedings against Khan and Chaudhry.

The poll decided to hold these proceedings in jail, instead of ECP headquarters, after the caretaker federal government declined to accept the electoral entity’s order to bring Khan to the ECP in the contempt case, citing security reasons.

Different public and political circles have taken on the electoral body and the caretaker government for their inability in ensuring foolproof security to the former PM for his trial at the ECP headquarters instead of jail.

In August 2022, the ECP issued contempt notices to Khan, Chaudhry and former PTI leader Umar for their public criticism of the ECP and Chief Election Commissioner Sikandar Sultan Raja. Umar has urged the electoral body to drop contempt proceedings against him given that he has “quit politics.” The case is pending.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.

Parvez Jan 04, 2024 01:34pm
As per LAW is the ECP a court ..... or does it only have adminstrative powers ?
thumb_up Recommended (0)