AIRLINK 72.59 Increased By ▲ 3.39 (4.9%)
BOP 4.99 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.84%)
CNERGY 4.29 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.7%)
DFML 31.71 Increased By ▲ 0.46 (1.47%)
DGKC 80.90 Increased By ▲ 3.65 (4.72%)
FCCL 21.42 Increased By ▲ 1.42 (7.1%)
FFBL 35.19 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (0.54%)
FFL 9.33 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (2.3%)
GGL 9.82 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.2%)
HBL 112.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-0.32%)
HUBC 136.50 Increased By ▲ 3.46 (2.6%)
HUMNL 7.14 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (2.73%)
KEL 4.35 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (2.84%)
KOSM 4.35 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (2.35%)
MLCF 37.67 Increased By ▲ 1.07 (2.92%)
OGDC 137.75 Increased By ▲ 4.88 (3.67%)
PAEL 23.41 Increased By ▲ 0.77 (3.4%)
PIAA 24.55 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (1.45%)
PIBTL 6.63 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (2.63%)
PPL 125.05 Increased By ▲ 8.75 (7.52%)
PRL 26.99 Increased By ▲ 1.09 (4.21%)
PTC 13.32 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (1.83%)
SEARL 52.70 Increased By ▲ 0.70 (1.35%)
SNGP 70.80 Increased By ▲ 3.20 (4.73%)
SSGC 10.54 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TELE 8.33 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.6%)
TPLP 10.95 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.39%)
TRG 60.60 Increased By ▲ 1.31 (2.21%)
UNITY 25.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.12%)
WTL 1.28 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.79%)
BR100 7,566 Increased By 157.7 (2.13%)
BR30 24,786 Increased By 749.4 (3.12%)
KSE100 71,902 Increased By 1235.2 (1.75%)
KSE30 23,595 Increased By 371 (1.6%)

LAHORE: A lack of understanding regarding penalties under Point of Sale (POS) regime on the part of tax practitioners and the appellant tribunals of Inland Revenue (ATIRs) is causing hurdles to the integration of Tier-1 Retailers (T-1Rs), sources said.

It may be noted that the ATIRs in Multan and Lahore have waived penalty for failure to integrate with the POS software on account of non-establishment of mens rea.

According to sources, the ATIR Multan was approached by one Tier-1 retailer to waive the penalty imposed by the commissioner IR Appeals for failure to integrate the POS software with the FBR. It was pointed out to the ATIR that the appellant has already been registered under the Sales Tax Act, 1990 and filing the monthly sales tax returns regularly. Therefore, the assessment was completely illegal without assessing that due to Covid-19 venders were not available to install the integration system. It was further brought to the light that the Inland Revenue officer could not pass order to impose a penalty without proper permanent legislation.

The ATIR observed that the Assessing Officer had imposed a huge penalty without taking into account that sales tax had already been paid by the appellant and that there was no justification for imposing the penalty without assessing that whether mens rea was present or not.

Similarly, the ATIR Lahore has also dismissed a punitive action on the grounds that the recovery of tax demanded was infructuous.

Meanwhile, the official sources have pointed out that the POS regime is different from the normal tax regime, as the show cause notice under the POS regime is deemed to be a demand notice. They said that the demand notice is issued after due diligence while providing an opportunity to appeal to the taxpayers. However, in case of failure to either make payment or challenge the notice, the department is authorised to withhold 60 percent input tax of the taxpayer.

It may be noted that the field formations are authorised to reduce the adjustable input tax for the whole of the tax period by 60 percent as per Sales Tax General Order 1 of 2022. It is followed by penalties, starting from Rs 500,000 up to 3 million in a short span of time and finally sealing of the business premises after 60 days of the levy of penalty.

Official sources said that the show case notice under the normal tax regime does not followed by stringent actions. However, the tax practitioners mix it up with the POS regime and challenge the show cause notices one after another. They have further feared that even the appellate tribunals, in some cases are unable to understand the difference.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2022

Comments

Comments are closed.