AIRLINK 58.82 Increased By ▲ 0.83 (1.43%)
BOP 6.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.32%)
CNERGY 4.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-1.23%)
DFML 15.78 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.51%)
DGKC 68.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-0.22%)
FCCL 17.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.56%)
FFBL 26.00 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (0.97%)
FFL 9.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.18%)
GGL 9.92 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (1.85%)
HBL 111.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.09%)
HUBC 116.20 Increased By ▲ 1.40 (1.22%)
HUMNL 6.51 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.09%)
KEL 4.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-2.56%)
KOSM 3.71 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (3.63%)
MLCF 37.55 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.4%)
OGDC 116.21 Decreased By ▼ -0.99 (-0.84%)
PAEL 22.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-1.31%)
PIAA 11.07 Decreased By ▼ -0.28 (-2.47%)
PIBTL 6.14 Increased By ▲ 0.47 (8.29%)
PPL 104.38 Decreased By ▼ -0.87 (-0.83%)
PRL 26.46 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.34%)
PTC 9.63 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.31%)
SEARL 51.89 Decreased By ▼ -1.45 (-2.72%)
SNGP 65.16 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (0.26%)
SSGC 11.00 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.55%)
TELE 7.23 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.98%)
TPLP 11.91 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.34%)
TRG 75.80 Increased By ▲ 3.09 (4.25%)
UNITY 20.63 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.48%)
WTL 1.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.76%)
BR100 6,315 Increased By 29.3 (0.47%)
BR30 21,682 Increased By 95.7 (0.44%)
KSE100 61,775 Increased By 216.3 (0.35%)
KSE30 20,794 Increased By 75.4 (0.36%)

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC), on Thursday sought a detailed report from the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) in identical petitions challenging vires of the Prevention of Electronic Crimes (Amendment) Ordinance, 2022.

A single bench of Chief Justice Athar Minallah heard the petitions filed by the Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists (PFUJ), the Pakistan Broadcasters Association, the Council of Pakistan Newspaper Editors (CPNE), Pakistan Peoples’ Party (PPP) leader Farhatullah Babar, and others challenging the recently-promulgated Prevention of Electronic Crimes (amendment) Ordinance, 2022.

During the hearing, Additional Attorney General Qasim Wadood appeared before the court and stated that 22,000 complaints out of 94,000 had been addressed.

The chief justice noted that the FIA had no such capacity as the officers have no professional training in this regard.

The bench said that the FIA had taken action on certain complaints to protect the repute of public office holders. It further said that there were only 4,000 cases before the bench out of 22,000 cases. The Additional Attorney General said that the ordinance could not be tabled in both houses at the same time. He said that section-20 of the PECA should remain intact with the ordinance.

The AAG said that the public office holders and policies could be criticized. However, personal attacks on public office holders and their relatives should not be permitted. The AAG said that an independent judiciary was working in the country to protect basic human rights.

Later, the court sought a detailed report from the director Cyber Crime Wing of the FIA and deferred the hearing of the case.

Previously, the counsel representing the Pakistan Broadcasters Association (PBA) and other media bodies informed the court about the impact of the controversial PECA ordinance on the independence of judiciary.

Their counsel Muneer A Malik advocate said that Article 144-A of the PECA undermined the independence of the judiciary and the judges.

He argued that the amendment to the PECA makes it incumbent upon courts to conclude trials within six months and furnish monthly progress reports of pending trials, and orders federal and provincial officials to remove any obstacles that may hinder the progress of the proceedings.

In this matter, the PFUJ moved the petition through their counsels Adil Aziz Qazi advocate and Haseeb Hassan advocate and cited President of Pakistan, Federation of Pakistan through secretary Ministry of Law and Federation of Pakistan through secretary Ministry of Information Broadcasting and National Heritage as respondents.

The petitioner prayed before the court that the Promulgation of the impugned Prevention of Electronic Crimes Amendment Ordinance of 2022 itself and the Ordinance may be declared as ultra-vires to the entire scheme of Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan 1973 and the fundamental rights of the people of Pakistan.

The petition stated that through the said Ordinance sections 2, 20, 43 have been amended while section 44A has been inserted in the existing law. The definition of the term “person” has been extended to company, association or body of persons whether incorporated or not, institution, organization, authority or any other body established by the Government.

It also said, “Furthermore in section 20 the word natural has been omitted and the sentence has been increased from three to five years while adding a new subsection 1(A) whereby the informant or complainant in respect of offence under subsection (1) shall be an aggrieved person, his authorized representative, or his guardian, where such person is a minor, or a member of the public in respect of a public figure or a holder of public office” has been added to the existing law.”

Copyright Business Recorder, 2022

Comments

Comments are closed.