BR100 Increased By (0.02%)
BR30 Increased By (0.06%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.05%)
BECO 5.52 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.36%)
BML 56.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.39 (-0.68%)
BOP 35.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.03%)
CNERGY 8.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.61%)
DCL 11.61 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.26%)
FCCL 56.61 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.21%)
FCSC 5.38 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (1.13%)
FFL 17.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-0.61%)
FNEL 1.29 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
HUMNL 11.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.8%)
KEL 8.39 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (2.32%)
KOSM 6.63 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.6%)
MLCF 101.06 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (0.3%)
NBP 202.44 Decreased By ▼ -0.56 (-0.28%)
PACE 11.42 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.61%)
PAEL 43.32 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (0.56%)
PIAHCLA 27.24 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (0.89%)
PIBTL 17.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.11%)
PPL 244.79 Increased By ▲ 2.16 (0.89%)
PRL 35.71 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.45%)
PTC 65.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.40 (-0.61%)
SEARL 93.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.03%)
SSGC 32.98 Increased By ▲ 0.75 (2.33%)
TELE 9.04 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.77%)
THCCL 66.80 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (0.47%)
TPLP 10.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.91%)
TREET 25.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-0.93%)
TRG 65.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.08%)
WAVES 11.13 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.27%)
WTL 1.27 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.79%)

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the federal government and the Attorney General for Pakistan regarding removal of Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui as a judge of the Islamabad High Court (IHC).

A five-member special bench, headed by Justice Umar Ata Bandial, heard Shaukat Siddiqui’s petition against the Supreme Judicial Council’s (SJC’s) recommendation to remove him.

Advocate Hamid Khan, representing the former judge of the IHC, submitted that the SJC proceedings against his client were held by dispensing the inquiry procedure envisaged under the Procedure of Inquiry, 2005 – Supreme Court of Pakistan as a result of that his client was deprived of open trial and due process, and the requirements associated for fair determination of the facts.

The counsel, relying upon the apex court’s judgment in the ex-CJP Chaudhry Iftikhar case, contended that the right recognised by the law with respect to a judge facing the SJC proceeding was violated.

He submitted the proceedings against his client were without jurisdiction and failed to meet the standard prescribed in the apex court judgment.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2021

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.