BR100 Increased By (0.21%)
BR30 Increased By (0.12%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.22%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.21%)
BECO 5.52 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.36%)
BML 57.12 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.05%)
BOP 35.25 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.11%)
CNERGY 8.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.12%)
DCL 11.61 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.26%)
FCCL 56.55 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.11%)
FCSC 5.31 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.19%)
FFL 18.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.06%)
FNEL 1.30 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.78%)
HUMNL 11.24 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.45%)
KEL 8.28 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.98%)
KOSM 6.69 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.3%)
MLCF 101.31 Increased By ▲ 0.55 (0.55%)
NBP 201.93 Decreased By ▼ -1.07 (-0.53%)
PACE 11.55 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.52%)
PAEL 43.49 Increased By ▲ 0.41 (0.95%)
PIAHCLA 27.06 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.22%)
PIBTL 17.95 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.62%)
PPL 243.70 Increased By ▲ 1.07 (0.44%)
PRL 35.88 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.03%)
PTC 65.99 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (0.21%)
SEARL 93.91 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (0.35%)
SSGC 33.05 Increased By ▲ 0.82 (2.54%)
TELE 9.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.22%)
THCCL 66.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.21%)
TPLP 10.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-1.37%)
TREET 25.79 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.27%)
TRG 66.00 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.08%)
WAVES 11.19 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.27%)
WTL 1.27 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.79%)
Pakistan

LHC reserves verdict on maintainability of plea against PDM protest in front of ECP

  • The single bench comprising Justice Shahid Jamil Khan heard the petition filed by Munir Ahmad.
Published January 19, 2021 Updated January 19, 2021 08:48pm
By

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court (LHC) on Tuesday reserved verdict on maintainability of a petition against Pakistan Democratic Movement's (PDM) protest in front of Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) on January 19.

The single bench comprising Justice Shahid Jamil Khan heard the petition filed by Munir Ahmad.

Advocate Muhammad Azhar Siddique on behalf of the petitioner stated that the PDM was holding a protest rally in front of the ECP. He submitted that the ECP had already asked the Islamabad administration to allow the protest in a specific area near Constitution Avenue only so that its working should not be affected.

He submitted that the protest was unconstitutional as it was an attempt to stop the ECP from performing its constitutional mandate.

He contended that the protest was also in clear violation of Articles 4, 5, 9, 15, 16 and 17 of the Constitution. He pleaded with the court to issue directions for stopping the protest.

In response to a court query, a federal law officer submitted that the PDM had not sought any permission for the protest from the Islamabad administration.

The court asked petitioner's counsel how the LHC could hear the matter as the protest was being held in Islamabad.

To which, the counsel replied that the LHC had heard cases about the Inqalab March in 2014.

Subsequently, the court, after hearing the arguments, reserved its verdict on maintainability of the petition.

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.