AIRLINK 75.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.04%)
BOP 5.14 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.38%)
CNERGY 4.61 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-2.95%)
DFML 29.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-0.37%)
DGKC 88.61 Decreased By ▼ -1.87 (-2.07%)
FCCL 22.59 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-1.35%)
FFBL 33.25 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (0.91%)
FFL 10.09 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.4%)
GGL 11.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.29 (-2.56%)
HBL 114.45 Increased By ▲ 0.96 (0.85%)
HUBC 137.45 Increased By ▲ 0.94 (0.69%)
HUMNL 9.39 Decreased By ▼ -0.51 (-5.15%)
KEL 4.61 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-1.07%)
KOSM 4.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.64%)
MLCF 40.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.62 (-1.51%)
OGDC 135.80 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (0.74%)
PAEL 27.21 Decreased By ▼ -0.40 (-1.45%)
PIAA 24.59 Decreased By ▼ -0.88 (-3.46%)
PIBTL 6.96 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.58%)
PPL 124.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-0.09%)
PRL 27.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.29%)
PTC 14.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-1.72%)
SEARL 61.00 Increased By ▲ 0.80 (1.33%)
SNGP 71.80 Increased By ▲ 1.25 (1.77%)
SSGC 10.60 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.38%)
TELE 8.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.24%)
TPLP 11.71 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.59%)
TRG 66.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.81 (-1.2%)
UNITY 25.23 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.24%)
WTL 1.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-2.03%)
BR100 7,767 Increased By 42.4 (0.55%)
BR30 25,613 Increased By 11.8 (0.05%)
KSE100 74,246 Increased By 447 (0.61%)
KSE30 23,850 Increased By 226.7 (0.96%)

The Lahore High Court on Tuesday reinstated Sui Northern Gas Pipeline Limited's Managing Director Arif Hameed to his post and sought a response from the company by September 17. Arif Hameed had challenged his termination through Uzair Karamat Bhandari who argued that the petitioner was an engineer and joined the gas company in 1978. He said the company's Board of Directors had appointed the petitioner on October 19, 2011 and his term was extended from time to time by the board.
The federal government on January 25 this year had appointed the petitioner as the managing director following a board recommendation but, he said, the board through a notification terminated his services and the acting charge of his post was given to the company's chief financial officer. He also argued that the impugned notification was mala fide and had been issued arbitrarily and that the MD/CEO could only be removed by the board through a resolution passed by 3/4th of the directors or by as many as of the shareholders through a special resolution. He denied that the board had passed such a resolution.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2015

Comments

Comments are closed.