BR100 Decreased By (-0.44%)
BR30 Decreased By (-0.67%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.14%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.22%)
BECO 5.57 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.72%)
BML 57.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.17%)
BOP 35.31 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.31%)
CNERGY 8.25 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.36%)
DCL 11.66 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.17%)
FCCL 56.96 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.11%)
FCSC 5.40 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.19%)
FFL 18.24 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.61%)
FNEL 1.31 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
HUMNL 11.30 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.07%)
KEL 8.33 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (2.21%)
KOSM 6.97 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.14%)
MLCF 101.06 Increased By ▲ 0.54 (0.54%)
NBP 203.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-0.13%)
PACE 11.30 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.8%)
PAEL 43.18 Increased By ▲ 0.43 (1.01%)
PIAHCLA 26.50 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (0.72%)
PIBTL 18.09 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.84%)
PPL 243.95 Increased By ▲ 2.01 (0.83%)
PRL 36.30 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (0.92%)
PTC 65.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.28 (-0.43%)
SEARL 94.80 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (0.42%)
SSGC 32.25 Increased By ▲ 0.93 (2.97%)
TELE 9.20 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.43%)
THCCL 66.96 Decreased By ▼ -0.66 (-0.98%)
TPLP 10.90 Increased By ▲ 0.66 (6.45%)
TREET 26.10 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (1.01%)
TRG 65.30 Decreased By ▼ -1.38 (-2.07%)
WAVES 11.24 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (1.72%)
WTL 1.29 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)

LAHORE: An appellate forum has held that a subsidy paid by the federal government to the Cotton Export Corporation of Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd was a revenue receipt and liable to income tax.

Departmental sources said this ruling in favour of the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has resolved a longstanding controversy regarding the status of subsidy under the Income Tax law.

The Cotton Export Corporation of Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd is a company incorporated by law, with 100% shares owned by the federal government. The company was established to promote the export of cotton from Pakistan.

The company had been receiving subsidies from the federal government to cover losses suffered due to the government’s policy of fixing cotton prices.

The case cantered on the corporation’s claim that the subsidy was a capital receipt and not taxable. However, the FBR argued that the subsidy was paid to reimburse the corporation for losses suffered due to the government’s policy of fixing cotton prices.

The appellate forum ruled that the subsidy was a revenue receipt, as it was paid to reduce the corporation’s losses.

The forum also held that the Inspecting Additional Commissioner (IAC) had the jurisdiction to exercise powers under Section 66-A of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979. The corporation had argued that the IAC did not have the jurisdiction to revise the original assessment order, as it was passed with the approval of the IAC. However, the forum held that the IAC’s involvement in the original assessment order did not preclude him from revising it later.

The court’s decision has implications for other taxpayers who have received subsidies from the government. The FBR has welcomed the decision, saying it will help to clarify the tax treatment of subsidies.

The case has been ongoing for several years, with the corporation challenging the FBR’s decision to tax the subsidy. The court’s decision is a significant victory for the FBR and is expected to have a major impact on the tax landscape in Pakistan.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.