AIRLINK 168.00 Increased By ▲ 2.64 (1.6%)
BOP 10.50 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.06%)
CNERGY 7.92 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.15%)
FCCL 46.41 Increased By ▲ 0.76 (1.66%)
FFL 15.31 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (1.26%)
FLYNG 26.60 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.45%)
HUBC 138.59 Increased By ▲ 3.31 (2.45%)
HUMNL 13.00 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.17%)
KEL 4.26 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.67%)
KOSM 5.63 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (2.93%)
MLCF 60.40 Increased By ▲ 0.97 (1.63%)
OGDC 215.50 Increased By ▲ 2.43 (1.14%)
PACE 5.52 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (2.03%)
PAEL 42.47 Increased By ▲ 0.46 (1.09%)
PIAHCLA 17.10 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.29%)
PIBTL 10.09 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (1.61%)
POWER 11.91 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.02%)
PPL 176.99 Increased By ▲ 2.20 (1.26%)
PRL 35.18 Increased By ▲ 0.82 (2.39%)
PTC 23.15 Increased By ▲ 0.45 (1.98%)
SEARL 95.00 Increased By ▲ 1.25 (1.33%)
SSGC 36.62 Increased By ▲ 0.51 (1.41%)
SYM 13.80 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (2.37%)
TELE 7.25 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.83%)
TPLP 10.40 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (1.86%)
TRG 61.70 Increased By ▲ 0.77 (1.26%)
WAVESAPP 10.30 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.19%)
WTL 1.31 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (2.34%)
YOUW 3.75 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (1.35%)
BR100 12,455 Increased By 141.2 (1.15%)
BR30 37,080 Increased By 572.7 (1.57%)
KSE100 116,330 Increased By 1420.8 (1.24%)
KSE30 35,964 Increased By 422.7 (1.19%)

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court has ruled that an accused has the right to obtain a video recording of the alleged raid related to a case against him.

The court passed the ruling on an appeal of Iqbal Nasir facing trial of a narcotics case.

The court allowed the appeal and directed the trial court to provide a copy of the USB to the appellant.

The court said, in order to enable the accused to know exactly the contents of the USB and prepare his defence for rebutting the charge through cross-examination, supply of a copy of video record to the accused is necessary.

The court observed, under Article 87 of Qanun-i-Shahadat Order, 1984 any person who has right to inspect the public document can have copy of the same.

The maintained that an accused has every right to inspect the police report and documents annexed with the same except police diaries, therefore, the accused can obtain a copy of the document mentioned in and appended with the police report except police diary.

The court noted that the prosecution clearly stated that the video of the occurrence had been preserved in a USB, and it will be produced during trial for proving the charge against the accused.

As per the prosecution, a police official at the time of raid made video film through camera of his mobile phone regarding proceedings of the raid including arrest of the appellant which was preserved in USB.

The trial court dismissed an application of the appellant seeking the video recording of the raid.

The court regretted that the trial court could not appreciate this legal aspect while passing the impugned order.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.