AIRLINK 157.50 Decreased By ▼ -6.88 (-4.19%)
BOP 10.38 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-1.8%)
CNERGY 8.29 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.31%)
CPHL 88.80 Decreased By ▼ -1.16 (-1.29%)
FCCL 46.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.09%)
FFL 14.91 Decreased By ▼ -0.33 (-2.17%)
FLYNG 26.90 Increased By ▲ 0.57 (2.16%)
HUBC 134.80 Decreased By ▼ -1.57 (-1.15%)
HUMNL 12.54 Decreased By ▼ -0.47 (-3.61%)
KEL 4.17 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-2.57%)
KOSM 5.41 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-3.57%)
MLCF 60.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.29 (-0.48%)
OGDC 208.75 Decreased By ▼ -6.14 (-2.86%)
PACE 5.37 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-3.07%)
PAEL 40.77 Decreased By ▼ -1.23 (-2.93%)
PIAHCLA 18.90 Increased By ▲ 1.16 (6.54%)
PIBTL 10.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-2.25%)
POWER 11.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-1.09%)
PPL 167.55 Decreased By ▼ -6.67 (-3.83%)
PRL 35.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.54 (-1.52%)
PTC 23.58 Increased By ▲ 0.64 (2.79%)
SEARL 92.97 Decreased By ▼ -2.07 (-2.18%)
SSGC 35.67 Decreased By ▼ -0.94 (-2.57%)
SYM 13.71 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-1.58%)
TELE 7.04 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-2.76%)
TPLP 9.98 Decreased By ▼ -0.29 (-2.82%)
TRG 60.17 Decreased By ▼ -1.36 (-2.21%)
WAVESAPP 9.63 Decreased By ▼ -0.69 (-6.69%)
WTL 1.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.52%)
YOUW 3.62 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.9%)
BR100 12,196 Decreased By -197.2 (-1.59%)
BR30 36,275 Decreased By -832.1 (-2.24%)
KSE100 113,953 Decreased By -1579.1 (-1.37%)
KSE30 35,161 Decreased By -501.2 (-1.41%)

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court (LHC) held that an amount cannot be recovered as arrears of land revenue unless it is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction.

The court passed this order in a petition filed by Muhammad Shakeel who approached the court against his father’s arrest under the Land Revenue Act 1967 without determining the outstanding amount by a court of competent jurisdiction.

The petitioner claimed that an electricity meter was installed in the name of Allah Bakhsh, the grandfather of the petitioner who has passed away.

The respondents imposed an illegal amount of rupees 83,56,398 as arrears.

The respondents firstly issued a notice under section 82 (1) of the Land Revenue Act 1967 for recovery of the said amount in the name of Allah Bakhsh and subsequently, a notice was issued in the name of detenue Abdul Ghafoor father of the petitioner for payment of the aforementioned liability of MEPCO.

The detenue later on May 18, 2024, was detained for 30 days.

The petitioner claimed that the amount sought to be recovered from the father of the petitioner has not yet been determined and liability against the father has not been established in any case, hence recovery from his father is not sustainable.

The legal advisor to the respondents stated that respondent authorities themselves are the final authorities to determine the outstanding amount and on his failure to make payment of outstanding dues, the father of the petitioner has been arrested.

The court; however, observed that the procedure envisaged under Sections 81 and 82 of the Land Revenue Act 1967 has not been properly adopted.

The court held that in the present case, proceedings under the Land Revenue Act for recovery of dues as arrears have been initiated without getting a determination of liability from any forum of competent jurisdiction including a court of law.

The court; therefore, allowed the petition and held that the arrest and detention of the father of the petitioner is illegal and without any legal effect and directed to release him forthwith.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.