AGL 37.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-0.68%)
AIRLINK 124.10 Increased By ▲ 2.59 (2.13%)
BOP 5.67 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-3.08%)
CNERGY 3.75 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
DCL 8.55 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.79%)
DFML 40.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.41 (-1%)
DGKC 87.10 Increased By ▲ 2.50 (2.96%)
FCCL 33.98 Increased By ▲ 1.28 (3.91%)
FFBL 66.01 Increased By ▲ 0.51 (0.78%)
FFL 10.20 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.49%)
HUBC 104.45 Increased By ▲ 0.65 (0.63%)
HUMNL 13.45 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (1.51%)
KEL 4.78 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (7.9%)
KOSM 6.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-3.53%)
MLCF 38.84 Increased By ▲ 1.34 (3.57%)
NBP 60.35 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.17%)
OGDC 179.65 Increased By ▲ 7.40 (4.3%)
PAEL 24.97 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (0.69%)
PIBTL 5.71 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.18%)
PPL 153.00 Increased By ▲ 11.31 (7.98%)
PRL 22.79 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.31%)
PTC 14.91 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (1.15%)
SEARL 66.85 Increased By ▲ 2.29 (3.55%)
TELE 7.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-1.82%)
TOMCL 35.70 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (0.56%)
TPLP 7.32 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.41%)
TREET 13.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-1.48%)
TRG 50.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.80 (-1.55%)
UNITY 26.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.75%)
WTL 1.23 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.82%)
BR100 9,717 Increased By 233.5 (2.46%)
BR30 29,237 Increased By 866.2 (3.05%)
KSE100 90,860 Increased By 1893.1 (2.13%)
KSE30 28,458 Increased By 630.4 (2.27%)

The caretaker government has set up a tax reforms taskforce to come up with recommendations to close the ‘tax gap’ due to weak compliance, without requiring any additional tax policy measures. This is the appropriate approach as the caretaker government does not have the power to change the existing tax laws.

The first estimate of lost revenues due to weak compliance by the FBR is very large at Rs 2.7 trillion in 2023-24. This is equivalent to 2.5% of the GDP. In other words, tax evasion and weak compliance have implied a loss of revenues equivalent to almost 30% of actual revenue. This is apparently FBR’s own estimate and reflects poorly on the quality of its own tax administration.

The FBR estimates are that the biggest loss as a percentage of actual revenues is in the sales tax of 50%, followed by 36% in income tax and much less at 15% in excise duty and customs duty. This is surprising. The general perception is that tax evasion is the highest and compliance the lowest in the income tax.

An initial indicator of level of compliance is the number of returns filed. As of January 2, 2023, the FBR’s website showed a total of 3,925,497 persons on the Active Income Tax Payers list (ALT). This is equivalent to only 8% of the number of employed outside the agricultural sector of Pakistan. Agricultural incomes are exempt from the federal income tax.

A comparison can also be made with the number of taxpayers who filed income tax returns in India. The number is 74 million, almost nineteen times the number who filed returns in Pakistan. The economy of India is eight times the size of Pakistan and with employment outside agriculture of 300 million; the rate of filing of returns by employed population is almost 25%. This is over three times the rate of filing of returns in Pakistan. It is not surprising that the tax to GDP ratio in India is as high as 17% of the GDP, substantially above that of Pakistan.

The low rate of filing of returns in Pakistan is surprising given the extremely elaborate withholding tax regime in the income tax system. There are almost 70 deductions at source and the withholding tax rate is double the normal rate on persons who are not on the Active Tax Payers List. Surely this ought to have increased the pressure to file returns.

The other issue is how much tax evasion is FBR able to identify through the process of auditing annually of a random sample of returns and by other mechanisms of detecting non-filing of returns. The total revenue generated from this process by FBR was Rs 101 billion in 2021-22. This is only 10% of the loss of revenues apparently due to low compliance. Clearly, there are leakages and inadequacies also in the audit process.

Which are the sectors which are likely to be characterized by low levels of income tax compliance? These are sectors where there are more informal transactions and higher proportion of small entities engaged in production or distribution. As such, small-scale manufacturing, wholesale and retail trade, transport and private services are likely to be more prone to lower levels of tax compliance.

The taskforce ought to focus on mechanisms for increasing revenues from these sectors by reducing the quantum of non-or-under reporting and tax evasion. This may require further broadening and deepening of the withholding tax regime. However, changes in sections of the Income Tax Ordinance relating to withholding taxes will also be required to be included in the Finance Act in a mini-budget or annual budget, which is beyond the constitutional powers granted to caretaker governments. However, innovative and effective administrative and process- related proposals may be identified by the taskforce for early implementation.

Turning to indirect taxes, the media has reported that almost Rs 1.4 trillion is estimated by the FBR as the revenue loss due to low compliance in these taxes, especially the sales tax. This is an inordinately large magnitude. If the estimate is, more or less, valid then this again highlights the failure of the FBR to limit the quantum of tax evasion. Hopefully, the taskforce will come up with ingenious proposals for digitalization of transactions, development of more elaborate track and trace systems, etc.

This is a need to highlight the necessity for raising the level of revenues from provincial taxes through higher compliance, with no changes in tax rates. Perhaps the best example is that of the urban immoveable property tax. Today, this tax fetches only Rs 30 billion in the four provinces combined.

The primary reason for the considerable under-exploitation of the revenue potential of the property tax is the greatly outdated assessments by the Provincial Excise and Taxation Departments of the Gross Annual Rental Values (GARVs) of properties for determination of the tax liability.

A comprehensive updating of the GARVs as an administrative measure could lead to a quantum jump is property tax revenues and enhance the financial resources especially of the large Metropolitan Corporations in the country.

In conclusion, it must be recognized that the caretaker government has taken the appropriate step of constituting a taskforce to identify mechanisms for raising the level of tax compliance. The time has also come for a comprehensive set of reforms to make the tax system of Pakistan markedly more progressive. This will facilitate the successor elected government in implementing expeditiously a strong agenda of tax reforms and use thereby the substantial additional revenues for providing major relief to the much larger population of the poor in Pakistan today.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Dr Hafiz A Pasha

The writer is Professor Emeritus at BNU and former Federal Minister

Comments

Comments are closed.

Arif Oct 03, 2023 09:01am
The writer failed to mention that there is no such thing as ‘Non-Filer’ in India . When you give amnesty to tax evaders by formally categorising them as Non Filers , then Tax compliance is the first item that is flushed down the toilet.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
IMTIAZ CASSUM AGBOATWALA Oct 03, 2023 01:28pm
A common man pays so much in indirect taxes ( petrol, telecommunications, groceries etc ) that direct taxes on income, are insignificant.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Dr. Ehtisham Ahmad Oct 03, 2023 02:03pm
It is a mistake to rely on withholding tax regimes, as this increases both the incentives and ability to evade, adds to the cost of doing business and makes it impossible to provide timely and accurate export refunds. In the end, you damage the economy and do not raise revenues.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Husnain Ashraf Oct 03, 2023 04:24pm
Sir, unless payment of taxes is not incentived, people will not opt to pay taxes. The tax rate too high for salaried class. The tax slabs are revised upwards for those who are salariied at more than 400,000 a month, presumably because the Government does not this much. This is also a way to under invoice the payments. There is penalty for those who do not pay.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Farooq Oct 04, 2023 04:31pm
Totally stupid as his policies was like still relying on consumption taxes.Why not going towards retailers who are evading taxes from years.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Shoaib Tirmazi Oct 04, 2023 08:19pm
With due respect to Dr. Sb, I disagree as regard to the withholding tax broadening and deepening point of view. Withholding and presumptive taxation has distorted the purpose of not only the direct taxation but also torn the social fabric of the society, as with the presumptive regime, against the payment of few percentages, anyone can accumulate illegal wealth as much as he could do. What is the result of presumptive and withholding taxes, it started in mid 90s and still we are struggling to get livable tax to GDP ratio. We should see taxes as per the very basic philosophy of Taxes otherwise we already here where road is closing nearby.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Ghareeb Awam Oct 05, 2023 04:39pm
There are many jokes associated with a certain community living primarily in our neighbourhood. One such popular joke implies that you are refused a certain facility if you ask for it, however, you are welcome to self-grant the same facility to yourself if you do not seek permission and go ahead with whatever you want to do. That is just a joke but it's implementation is seen the best in Pakistan. In other words:- - You pay tax, pay more and pay also for those who do not pay. You do not pay tax, never mind because the others will pay for you. - You pay electricity bill, pay it more and also pay for those who do not pay. You do not pay electricity bill, never mind because others will pay for you. - The same holds true for gas and other utilities.
thumb_up Recommended (0)