AIRLINK 70.30 Decreased By ▼ -2.76 (-3.78%)
BOP 4.94 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-2.95%)
CNERGY 4.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-1.14%)
DFML 31.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.97 (-2.99%)
DGKC 76.74 Increased By ▲ 1.25 (1.66%)
FCCL 19.75 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (1.18%)
FFBL 35.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.90 (-2.49%)
FFL 9.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.76%)
GGL 9.90 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.51%)
HBL 113.30 Decreased By ▼ -3.40 (-2.91%)
HUBC 132.99 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (0.23%)
HUMNL 6.97 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-1.83%)
KEL 4.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.59%)
KOSM 4.41 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.23%)
MLCF 36.50 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (0.83%)
OGDC 134.25 Increased By ▲ 0.75 (0.56%)
PAEL 22.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-0.66%)
PIAA 25.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.91 (-3.5%)
PIBTL 6.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.61%)
PPL 117.10 Increased By ▲ 1.79 (1.55%)
PRL 26.47 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.6%)
PTC 13.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-1.77%)
SEARL 52.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.80 (-1.5%)
SNGP 67.76 Increased By ▲ 0.51 (0.76%)
SSGC 10.59 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.03%)
TELE 8.51 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.07%)
TPLP 10.93 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (1.67%)
TRG 62.18 Decreased By ▼ -1.69 (-2.65%)
UNITY 25.20 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.32%)
WTL 1.28 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.79%)
BR100 7,445 Decreased By -15.7 (-0.21%)
BR30 24,126 Decreased By -45.1 (-0.19%)
KSE100 71,070 Decreased By -32.5 (-0.05%)
KSE30 23,383 Decreased By -12.1 (-0.05%)

imageLAHORE: The Lahore High Court Wednesday set aside decisions of district delimitation authorities on pleas challenging local government delimitations in several union councils (UCs) of Bhakkar, Gujrat, Gujranawala, Sargodha and Kasur.

The court asked the district delimitation authorities to decide the applications after hearing the stance of the parties and passed a speaking order.

Justice Shahid Karim passed these orders on various petitions filed by Mian Afzal and others challenging the decisions of district delimitation authorities regarding objections against delimitations of union councils.

The petitioners submitted that the district delimitation authorities failed to decide their objections in accordance with laws.

They submitted that the authorities had issued stereotype orders without inspecting sites and seeking reply from respondents.

They contended that the step was in violation of Article 10 of the constitution and section 24 A of General clauses Act 1857 wherein it was mandatory to pass a speaking order in this regard.

They pleaded the court to set aside the decisions being illegal.

Copyright APP (Associated Press of Pakistan), 2015

Comments

Comments are closed.