AIRLINK 176.00 Decreased By ▼ -1.56 (-0.88%)
BOP 11.16 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1%)
CNERGY 8.28 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.35%)
FCCL 47.95 Increased By ▲ 0.63 (1.33%)
FFL 16.39 Increased By ▲ 0.27 (1.67%)
FLYNG 27.23 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-0.44%)
HUBC 144.11 Decreased By ▼ -2.80 (-1.91%)
HUMNL 13.65 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.04%)
KEL 4.49 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.22%)
KOSM 5.94 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.51%)
MLCF 62.85 Increased By ▲ 0.83 (1.34%)
OGDC 231.00 Decreased By ▼ -3.68 (-1.57%)
PACE 5.83 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.52%)
PAEL 45.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.91 (-1.96%)
PIAHCLA 17.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-0.94%)
PIBTL 10.68 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.04%)
POWER 12.06 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.58%)
PPL 189.25 Decreased By ▼ -2.55 (-1.33%)
PRL 37.49 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (0.46%)
PTC 23.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.86%)
SEARL 101.00 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.11%)
SSGC 39.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.56 (-1.41%)
SYM 15.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.2%)
TELE 7.88 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.51%)
TPLP 11.15 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.36%)
TRG 66.10 Decreased By ▼ -1.19 (-1.77%)
WAVESAPP 11.13 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-1.94%)
WTL 1.36 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
YOUW 3.83 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (1.59%)
BR100 12,923 Increased By 116.1 (0.91%)
BR30 39,341 Decreased By -362.2 (-0.91%)
KSE100 119,731 Increased By 792.8 (0.67%)
KSE30 37,075 Increased By 318.6 (0.87%)

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court on Wednesday sought replies from the provincial government and others by September 30 on a petition challenging the Punjab Defamation Act 2024.

The court has already linked any proceedings under the Defamation Act till the final decision on the petition.

The petitioner President of a journalist union through its counsel argued that the defamation law was against basic human rights and the Constitution.

He claimed that the government made the law to suppress freedom of expression and to avoid public criticism.

He asked the court to declare the impugned law unconstitutional.

During the previous hearing, Advocate General Punjab (AGP) told the court that no proceedings had so far been started under the impugned law.

He also clarified that neither tribunals had been formed nor rules established under the law. He was of the view that no aggrieved party had so far filed a petition.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.