AIRLINK 72.80 Increased By ▲ 0.62 (0.86%)
BOP 5.06 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (2.64%)
CNERGY 4.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.46%)
DFML 30.52 Increased By ▲ 2.03 (7.13%)
DGKC 85.95 Increased By ▲ 4.65 (5.72%)
FCCL 22.35 Increased By ▲ 0.85 (3.95%)
FFBL 33.22 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (0.51%)
FFL 9.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.81%)
GGL 10.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.76%)
HBL 113.62 Decreased By ▼ -0.38 (-0.33%)
HUBC 136.20 Decreased By ▼ -3.80 (-2.71%)
HUMNL 10.03 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (11.07%)
KEL 4.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.48%)
KOSM 4.40 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.46%)
MLCF 38.35 Increased By ▲ 0.70 (1.86%)
OGDC 133.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-0.22%)
PAEL 27.40 Increased By ▲ 1.80 (7.03%)
PIAA 24.76 Increased By ▲ 0.78 (3.25%)
PIBTL 6.55 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.08%)
PPL 121.21 Decreased By ▼ -1.41 (-1.15%)
PRL 27.15 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.3%)
PTC 13.89 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (2.13%)
SEARL 60.40 Increased By ▲ 3.78 (6.68%)
SNGP 68.53 Decreased By ▼ -0.71 (-1.03%)
SSGC 10.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.1%)
TELE 9.05 Increased By ▲ 0.60 (7.1%)
TPLP 11.26 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.18%)
TRG 65.70 Increased By ▲ 4.49 (7.34%)
UNITY 25.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.32%)
WTL 1.50 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BR100 7,608 Decreased By -22.2 (-0.29%)
BR30 25,091 Increased By 100.6 (0.4%)
KSE100 72,658 Increased By 56.2 (0.08%)
KSE30 23,383 Decreased By -155.9 (-0.66%)

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court (LHC) on Monday referred petitions of Suni Ittehad Council (SIC) and others against the denial of reserved seats to SIC in the assemblies.

Earlier, a law officer for the Punjab government told the court that the reply was ready for the signature of the Advocate General of Punjab, who was busy before the Supreme Court.

A law officer representing the federation sought two weeks time to submit the reply.

The court noted that a reasonable time had already been granted in this case.

The court, therefore, directed the federal government to file reply to the petition of the SIC and the connected petitions positively before the next hearing.

The counsel of SIC contended that similar petitions filed before the Sindh and Peshawar high courts were heard by larger benches, therefore, the petitions before the LHC should also be heard by a larger bench.

The court inclining with the counsel referred the petition to the Chief Justice as some questions of public importance in relation to interpretation of the constitutional provisions as well as vires of section 104 of the Elections Act, 2017 involved in the matter.

The petitioner Chairman SIC Sahibzada Hamid Raza contended that the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) misconstrued and misapplied the provisions of Articles 51 and 106 of the Constitution as well as Section 104 of the Elections Act, 2017.

He said the entire emphasis of the ECP was on the election schedule and date fixed for submitting the priority list for reserved seats.

The petitioner argued that the SIC was a duly enlisted political party and had been allocated an electoral symbol. Therefore, the petitioner said the SIC was entitled to reserved seats equal to the number of independent candidates who joined it.

The petitioner, therefore, asked the court to set aside the ECP’s decision and order it to allocate reserved seats to the SIC based on its strength in the National Assembly.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.