AIRLINK 69.20 Decreased By ▼ -3.86 (-5.28%)
BOP 4.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-3.73%)
CNERGY 4.26 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-2.52%)
DFML 31.25 Decreased By ▼ -1.20 (-3.7%)
DGKC 77.25 Increased By ▲ 1.76 (2.33%)
FCCL 20.00 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (2.46%)
FFBL 35.00 Decreased By ▼ -1.15 (-3.18%)
FFL 9.12 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.08%)
GGL 9.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.51%)
HBL 112.76 Decreased By ▼ -3.94 (-3.38%)
HUBC 133.04 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (0.26%)
HUMNL 6.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-2.11%)
KEL 4.23 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-4.08%)
KOSM 4.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-3.41%)
MLCF 36.60 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (1.1%)
OGDC 132.87 Decreased By ▼ -0.63 (-0.47%)
PAEL 22.64 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.18%)
PIAA 24.20 Decreased By ▼ -1.81 (-6.96%)
PIBTL 6.46 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-1.37%)
PPL 116.30 Increased By ▲ 0.99 (0.86%)
PRL 25.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.73 (-2.74%)
PTC 13.08 Decreased By ▼ -1.02 (-7.23%)
SEARL 52.00 Decreased By ▼ -1.45 (-2.71%)
SNGP 67.60 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (0.52%)
SSGC 10.54 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-1.5%)
TELE 8.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-1.66%)
TPLP 10.80 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.47%)
TRG 59.29 Decreased By ▼ -4.58 (-7.17%)
UNITY 25.13 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.04%)
WTL 1.27 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BR100 7,409 Decreased By -52.4 (-0.7%)
BR30 24,036 Decreased By -134.9 (-0.56%)
KSE100 70,667 Decreased By -435.6 (-0.61%)
KSE30 23,224 Decreased By -170.8 (-0.73%)

December of 2017 had higher electricity generation than December of 2023. It is this bad. The 1HFY24 power generation at 66 billion units matches that of 1HFY21, when COVID restrictions were still there in some shape and industrial demand had tanked. Electricity generation has now declined for the third month running, with December 2023 generation at 7.4 billion units, down 8.4 percent year-on-year. On a 12-month moving average basis, power generation at 10.5 billion units is a 7-month low. The trend that started in January 2023 has now stretched a full year.

It was seen coming too. The last 18-20 months have been among the worst phases in the country’s economic history. The more telling blow was dealt by a significant revision in base tariffs at the turn of FY24. To top it off, more surcharges and higher periodic adjustments have made electricity insanely expensive at all consumption points.

Industrial activity has not picked pace yet either, with the LSM down 0.8 percent year-on-year during 1HFY24. But the industrial output in Pakistan is considerably higher than five, six, or seven years ago – whereas electricity generation is stuck in the past. Numbers often come with a lag, but there is a high likelihood that industries have increasingly moved away from the grid, opting for captive or other sources of power generation.

The more worrying aspect is that of generation fuel cost, which at Rs81 billion is a colossal 72 percent higher than the reference fuel charges for December. The CPPA has requested a sharp upward adjustment of Rs5.62/unit in lieu of monthly Fuel Charges Adjustment (FCA) for December 2023. The FCA sought is even higher than the reference fuel cost of Rs5.4/unit.

Mind you, global energy commodity prices have not risen in the recent past and currency has remained largely stable. The deviation comes despite much reduced actual generation as compared to the reference point at 8.3 billion units. The core reason is an unrealistic generation mix forecast while determining the Power Purchase price (PPP) for FY24.

The generation mix had an LNG share of a mere 5 percent of the total at 6.6 billion units for the entire FY24. Actual RLNG-based power generation in just six months is already nearing 12 billion units, having cost Rs286 billion. Rs 156 billion was billed for reference fuel charges for FY24 when the base tariff revision exercise was carried out last year in July. In just half the year, the fuel charges have nearly doubled on RLNG – that explains the sharp deviation from reference charges and high adjustments in FCA, month after month.

Also note that December’s FCA, unlike the previous two months, does not include a sharp previous adjustment (Rs36 billion for Oct & Nov) on Thar Coal Block-1 (TCB-1) power generation company. Reduced actual generation will also lead to higher quarterly adjustments in the near future. Rs 516 billion are the reference capacity charges for 2QFY24 at 27.5 billion units. The actual generation for the said quarter is a little under 24 billion units. Do the math. Elections or no elections, IMF or no IMF, power is all set to remain extremely pricey for a long time to come.

Comments

200 characters
Qaisar Saleem Jan 18, 2024 09:49am
The major reason for lower power generation seems to be the shift from grid to renewable energy resources. The lower consumption of imported fuels is good as this results in lower imports which help in reducing trade deficit. The share of low cost energy production resoources like nuclear energy, hydral energy and local coal based energy production should be further enhanced. The reliance on local energy resources is the only answer and the exploration of new oil & gas should be given the highest priority.
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
KU Jan 18, 2024 04:15pm
The information circulating among the Raj is that solar and wind power needs to be curtailed, especially private investment. The intention is to revive IPPs and make everyone money-merry at the cost of people and eventually the industry. Daylight criminal negligence on ease of adopting solar energy could never have been imagined, but it is happening at the hands of few officials who are all set to make money on sneaky schemes.
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply