BR100 Decreased By (-0.98%)
BR30 Decreased By (-0.58%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.97%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-1.07%)
AGHA 7.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.41%)
BECO 5.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.96%)
BML 56.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.90 (-1.57%)
BOP 33.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.62%)
CNERGY 9.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.1%)
CSIL 5.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.19%)
FCCL 53.07 Decreased By ▼ -1.63 (-2.98%)
FFL 16.58 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-0.66%)
FNEL 1.22 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.81%)
KEL 7.27 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-1.76%)
KOSM 5.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.69%)
LOTCHEM 29.55 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (0.78%)
MLCF 92.90 Decreased By ▼ -1.46 (-1.55%)
NBP 202.00 Decreased By ▼ -1.05 (-0.52%)
NCPL 56.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.28%)
NPL 66.62 Decreased By ▼ -1.08 (-1.6%)
OGDC 318.98 Increased By ▲ 3.14 (0.99%)
PACE 10.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.85%)
PAEL 42.31 Decreased By ▼ -0.89 (-2.06%)
PIBTL 16.39 Decreased By ▼ -0.35 (-2.09%)
PPL 218.50 Decreased By ▼ -1.28 (-0.58%)
PRL 51.20 Increased By ▲ 2.01 (4.09%)
PTC 70.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.53 (-0.75%)
SSGC 26.96 Decreased By ▼ -1.29 (-4.57%)
TBL 9.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.12%)
TELE 8.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.25%)
TPL 17.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-1.37%)
TPLP 13.44 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (1.28%)
TREET 22.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-0.75%)
TRG 59.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.66 (-1.1%)

ISLAMABAD: The Sindh High Court (SHC) directed the petitioners not to move applications in the next four weeks either for the adjustment or refund of the amount paid towards the tax on the annual rental value of the property imposed by the Cantonment Boards.

A division bench of the SHC after hearing the arguments of the counsels disposed of the case.

It noted that the Eighteenth Amendment brought a change to and amended Entry 50 in the Fourth Schedule (Federal Legislative List) of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan.

It said as a consequence thereof, the Federation and all Cantonment Boards lack competence, power, and jurisdiction to levy, charge, impose and recover any or all tax(es) on any immovable property, including, but not limited to, tax on the annual rental value of immovable property.

Collection of professional tax by cantonment boards illegal: SC

Further, the Eighteenth Amendment, consequently, restored the competence and jurisdiction of the province to levy, charge, recover, and legislate on the subject identified above and to pursue it accordingly.

The court added that finally, the amounts so recovered by the Cantonment Boards under the aforesaid subject of tax since the Eighteenth Amendment also call for an account.

At the time of the announcement of this short order, Farogh Naseem, appearing for some of the Cantonment Boards has requested that since a short order has been passed in the above terms and the competence, power, and jurisdiction of the Cantonment Boards could not be enforced for aforesaid subject; therefore, in terms of clause (iii) of the short order, the petitioners may not move applications in the next four weeks either for the adjustment or refund of the amount paid towards the aforesaid subject, i.e., tax on the annual rental value of the property, as the respondents intend to approach the Supreme Court.

The SHC; therefore, ordered accordingly.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.