BR100 Increased By (0.2%)
BR30 Increased By (0.41%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.07%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.23%)
AGHA 7.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-2.15%)
BECO 5.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.19%)
BML 58.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.59 (-1%)
BOP 33.69 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.03%)
CNERGY 10.61 Increased By ▲ 0.80 (8.15%)
CSIL 5.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-2.21%)
FCCL 53.74 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (0.41%)
FFL 16.46 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-1.32%)
FNEL 1.22 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.83%)
KEL 7.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.95%)
KOSM 5.64 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.53%)
LOTCHEM 29.65 Increased By ▲ 0.54 (1.86%)
MLCF 96.36 Increased By ▲ 0.86 (0.9%)
NBP 203.53 Decreased By ▼ -0.82 (-0.4%)
NCPL 56.85 Decreased By ▼ -1.39 (-2.39%)
NPL 67.31 Decreased By ▼ -0.48 (-0.71%)
OGDC 318.22 Increased By ▲ 0.28 (0.09%)
PACE 10.63 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.75%)
PAEL 41.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.14%)
PIBTL 16.81 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (1.88%)
PPL 220.17 Increased By ▲ 0.43 (0.2%)
PRL 49.05 Increased By ▲ 4.46 (10%)
PTC 70.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.76 (-1.07%)
SSGC 29.14 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (0.73%)
TBL 9.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.71%)
TELE 8.82 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.68%)
TPL 17.17 Increased By ▲ 0.72 (4.38%)
TPLP 12.51 Increased By ▲ 0.41 (3.39%)
TREET 22.59 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.92%)
TRG 60.22 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (0.32%)

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Vice-Chairman Shah Mahmood Qureshi prayed before the Supreme Court to grant him post-arrest bail in the cypher case.

The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on November 8 had dismissed the former foreign minister’s bail plea. Qureshi, on Monday, filed an appeal against the IHC’s order under Article 185(3) of the constitution through advocate Syed Muhammad Ali Bukhari.

Bukhari submitted that the impugned order has failed to take into consideration that the liberty of the petitioner is not being protected as guaranteed by the constitution.

The impugned order is arbitrary, capricious, contradictory, and passed in undue haste on the part of the courts below. He said that the petitioner is ready to furnish reasonable surety to the satisfaction of this court and also undertakes not to abscond or tamper with the prosecution witnesses.

The IHC has erroneously observed that the case in hand is a case of death and (14) years to the exclusion of Section 5 (3) (b) where maximum liability is a fine or two years’ imprisonment. It is only after the recording of the evidence that it can be ascertained as to which punishment, if at all, is attracted to the instant case.

The entire prosecution’s argument is premised on the retention of the cypher, but it is pertinent to highlight that the petitioner’s copy was returned and the petitioner never made an unlawful statement or use of the cypher which would warrant an offence under the Official Secrets Act.

The investigating agency has, without due consideration, implicated the petitioner in a matter that, by no reasonable standard, establishes any wrongdoing on his part. To establish an offence under the Official Secrets Act, it is not sufficient merely to level accusations; there must also be concrete evidence of the “actusreus”, a fundamental element to the offence.

The petitioner neither committed the “actusreus” nor harboured the requisite “mens rea” for the alleged offences, rendering him entirely innocent of any wrongdoing or criminal activity.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.