AIRLINK 72.59 Increased By ▲ 3.39 (4.9%)
BOP 4.99 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.84%)
CNERGY 4.29 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.7%)
DFML 31.71 Increased By ▲ 0.46 (1.47%)
DGKC 80.90 Increased By ▲ 3.65 (4.72%)
FCCL 21.42 Increased By ▲ 1.42 (7.1%)
FFBL 35.19 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (0.54%)
FFL 9.33 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (2.3%)
GGL 9.82 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.2%)
HBL 112.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-0.32%)
HUBC 136.50 Increased By ▲ 3.46 (2.6%)
HUMNL 7.14 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (2.73%)
KEL 4.35 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (2.84%)
KOSM 4.35 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (2.35%)
MLCF 37.67 Increased By ▲ 1.07 (2.92%)
OGDC 137.75 Increased By ▲ 4.88 (3.67%)
PAEL 23.41 Increased By ▲ 0.77 (3.4%)
PIAA 24.55 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (1.45%)
PIBTL 6.63 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (2.63%)
PPL 125.05 Increased By ▲ 8.75 (7.52%)
PRL 26.99 Increased By ▲ 1.09 (4.21%)
PTC 13.32 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (1.83%)
SEARL 52.70 Increased By ▲ 0.70 (1.35%)
SNGP 70.80 Increased By ▲ 3.20 (4.73%)
SSGC 10.54 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TELE 8.33 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.6%)
TPLP 10.95 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.39%)
TRG 60.60 Increased By ▲ 1.31 (2.21%)
UNITY 25.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.12%)
WTL 1.28 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.79%)
BR100 7,546 Increased By 137.4 (1.85%)
BR30 24,809 Increased By 772.4 (3.21%)
KSE100 71,902 Increased By 1235.2 (1.75%)
KSE30 23,595 Increased By 371 (1.6%)

ISLAMABAD: Tax experts have alleged that the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) implements court orders in favour of the taxpayers only after receiving calls from the courts for personal attendance of FBR officials.

When contacted for comments, a tax expert explained that there is a Legal Wing in the FBR headed by a Grade-21 member but it appears that apart from mindset, the workload is too much due to the multiplicity of litigation that court orders are not implemented until court calls for personal attendance of FBR officials.

Tax expert explained that mostly, taxpayers are reluctant to initiate contempt of court proceedings as the local department has the tendency to teach a lesson to the taxpayer for going to the court, which are also very lenient with the FBR officials.

Sections 111, 122 of Income Tax Ordinance: FBR cannot issue combined notice to taxpayer: IHC

He said that time and again, the superior judiciary has lamented the working of the FBR and there is hardly any improvement. Rather, most of the time, relevant orders of the court giving some direction to the FBR are not in the knowledge of the concerned officers as either there are no SOPs or the same are not followed.

As per a recent instance, the Lahore High Court Multan Bench, in its order dated October 3, 2023, in writ petition no14614/2023 directed the chairman FBR to decide the issue of income tax refund under Section 170A pending with the FBR within 30 days and to regulate the proceedings directed the petitioner to appear before the chairman FBR on October 16, 2023.

However, when Usman Shaukat advocate/AR of the petitioner, attended the chairman FBR office his secretariat was not aware of the court order and even on providing a certified copy was asked to write an application seeking an appointment.

Though not required by any procedure, the needful was done but despite follow-up and lapse of two weeks, the requisite appointment has not been given.

The expert explained that section 170A regarding the electronic processing of income tax refunds was inserted through the Finance Act, 2021 and after the lapse of more than two years, not a single income tax refund has been issued by the FBR through a similar process of sales tax refund stands streamlined.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Comments

Comments are closed.

Farooq Nov 08, 2023 02:43pm
Most Corrupt nation in the world
thumb_up Recommended (0)