BR100 Increased By (0.73%)
BR30 Increased By (0.59%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.71%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.75%)
AGHA 7.76 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.13%)
BECO 5.20 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.19%)
BML 57.01 Decreased By ▼ -1.65 (-2.81%)
BOP 34.23 Increased By ▲ 0.54 (1.6%)
CNERGY 10.83 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (2.07%)
CSIL 5.43 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (2.45%)
FCCL 54.90 Increased By ▲ 1.16 (2.16%)
FFL 16.72 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (1.58%)
FNEL 1.25 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (2.46%)
KEL 7.44 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (2.2%)
KOSM 5.76 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (2.13%)
LOTCHEM 29.78 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (0.44%)
MLCF 95.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.56 (-0.58%)
NBP 204.00 Increased By ▲ 0.47 (0.23%)
NCPL 57.80 Increased By ▲ 0.95 (1.67%)
NPL 69.12 Increased By ▲ 1.81 (2.69%)
OGDC 318.40 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (0.06%)
PACE 10.82 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (1.79%)
PAEL 42.90 Increased By ▲ 1.13 (2.71%)
PIBTL 16.88 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.42%)
PPL 221.00 Increased By ▲ 0.83 (0.38%)
PRL 51.60 Increased By ▲ 2.55 (5.2%)
PTC 70.90 Increased By ▲ 0.89 (1.27%)
SSGC 28.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.69 (-2.37%)
TBL 9.95 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (1.84%)
TELE 8.94 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.36%)
TPL 18.24 Increased By ▲ 1.07 (6.23%)
TPLP 13.04 Increased By ▲ 0.53 (4.24%)
TREET 22.80 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (0.93%)
TRG 59.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.37 (-0.61%)

ISLAMABAD: Attock jail authorities have refused to allow Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan to have a telephone conversation with his sons.

The Attock Jail superintendent submitted a reply to the contempt petition, stating that the jail rules do not allow connecting any prisoner via telephone. The special court judge, Abual Hasnat Muhammad Zulqarnain, while hearing the cipher case against Khan and others, ordered to allow Khan to talk to his sons.

According to the reply submitted before the court, there is no provision in Pakistan Prisons Rules 1978 that allows any prisoner to have telephonic conversations outside the country.

Furthermore, as per the letter dated December 6, 2022, prisoners involved in Secret Act, 1923, are not allowed PCO facilities.

On receipt of the order on August 31 of the special court in this office a report was also submitted in the court on September 1, it says.

Therefore, the undersigned has not violated the order of August 31 of the court.

The undersigned always complied with the order of the court and could not even think to disobey the orders of the court.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023\

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.

Mark Sep 16, 2023 10:31am
Why should this be the news.
0
Parvez Sep 16, 2023 11:36am
It's a shame that our so called " independent media " does not have the courage to point out the blatant discrimination between treatment of political leaders by our law enforcers.
0
John Sep 17, 2023 12:13pm
Same old script nothing has change in the land of the pure except rulers "arrogance of ignorance: and "suffering of masses."
0