BR100 Increased By (0.2%)
BR30 Increased By (0.41%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.07%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.23%)
AGHA 7.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-2.15%)
BECO 5.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.19%)
BML 58.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.59 (-1%)
BOP 33.69 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.03%)
CNERGY 10.61 Increased By ▲ 0.80 (8.15%)
CSIL 5.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-2.21%)
FCCL 53.74 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (0.41%)
FFL 16.46 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-1.32%)
FNEL 1.22 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.83%)
KEL 7.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.95%)
KOSM 5.64 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.53%)
LOTCHEM 29.65 Increased By ▲ 0.54 (1.86%)
MLCF 96.36 Increased By ▲ 0.86 (0.9%)
NBP 203.53 Decreased By ▼ -0.82 (-0.4%)
NCPL 56.85 Decreased By ▼ -1.39 (-2.39%)
NPL 67.31 Decreased By ▼ -0.48 (-0.71%)
OGDC 318.22 Increased By ▲ 0.28 (0.09%)
PACE 10.63 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.75%)
PAEL 41.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.14%)
PIBTL 16.81 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (1.88%)
PPL 220.17 Increased By ▲ 0.43 (0.2%)
PRL 49.05 Increased By ▲ 4.46 (10%)
PTC 70.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.76 (-1.07%)
SSGC 29.14 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (0.73%)
TBL 9.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.71%)
TELE 8.82 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.68%)
TPL 17.17 Increased By ▲ 0.72 (4.38%)
TPLP 12.51 Increased By ▲ 0.41 (3.39%)
TREET 22.59 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.92%)
TRG 60.22 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (0.32%)
Pakistan

CJP expects no civilian trial in military courts while case being heard in SC

  • Says all 102 people currently in the military’s custody should be allowed to meet their families
Published Updated

Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Umar Ata Bandial said on Monday that he expected no civilians would be tried in military courts while the matter was being heard in the Supreme Court (SC).

The CJP said that all the 102 people currently in the military’s custody should be allowed to meet their families.

Earlier, the seven-member SC which was hearing a set of pleas challenging the military trials of civilians was dissolved for a second time after Justice Mansoor Ali Shah recused himself from hearing the case.

During the hearing, Attorney General for Pakistan (AGP) Mansoor Usman Awan relayed the government’s objections to Justice Shah’s inclusion in the bench, saying that one of the petitioners, ex-CJP Jawwad S Khawaja, was related to him.

’’The bench will not be made by your will,“ the CJP said as he expressed his anger. He asked the AGP on what basis was he raising objections on Justice Shah.

The attorney general replied that Justice Shah had a conflict of interest.

Subsequently, Judge Shah also recused himself from hearing the case.

Once the hearing resumed, the CJP formed a six-member bench comprising, Justice Ijazul Ahsan, Justice Muneeb Akhtar, Justice Yahya Afridi, Justice Sayyed Ma­­zahar Ali Akbar Naqvi and Justice Ayesha Malik.

Originally, a nine-bench bench had been constituted to hear the case. However, on the first hearing, Justice Qazi Faez Isa had said he did not consider the SC bench “a bench“. Justice Sardar Tariq Masood had also raised his objections.

Later, once the hearing resumed, the CJP formed a seven-member bench.

During the last hearing, the AGP informed the apex court that 102 people all over the country are in military custody, none of them women or juveniles, and no decision has been taken yet to try women and juveniles in the military courts.

AGP Awan further said that no journalist or lawyer is in military custody.

The chief justice hinted that by Tuesday, which is the last working day because of Eid, to declare the result of the instant proceedings. The Court wanted the outcome of the hearing “is simple and not straightaway”.

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.

KU Jun 26, 2023 01:02pm
The true face of our very unprofessional executive and judiciary is now apparent to the nation. It is true that for a few incentives, virtue, honesty, and anything good in humanity are always for sale. It is also apparent that deliberate effort and design are being implemented to make the judiciary contentious, and very soon a verdict on the judicial system will be announced by the monarchy. Needless to hope that the repercussions of these acts will resonate for many years to come.
0
Tulukan Mairandi Jun 26, 2023 05:54pm
Its about time the CJP is also tried under Army Act
0
Parvez Jun 26, 2023 09:18pm
Is the CJ and the SC still relevant ?
0