AIRLINK 72.59 Increased By ▲ 3.39 (4.9%)
BOP 4.99 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.84%)
CNERGY 4.29 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.7%)
DFML 31.71 Increased By ▲ 0.46 (1.47%)
DGKC 80.90 Increased By ▲ 3.65 (4.72%)
FCCL 21.42 Increased By ▲ 1.42 (7.1%)
FFBL 35.19 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (0.54%)
FFL 9.33 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (2.3%)
GGL 9.82 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.2%)
HBL 112.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-0.32%)
HUBC 136.50 Increased By ▲ 3.46 (2.6%)
HUMNL 7.14 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (2.73%)
KEL 4.35 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (2.84%)
KOSM 4.35 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (2.35%)
MLCF 37.67 Increased By ▲ 1.07 (2.92%)
OGDC 137.75 Increased By ▲ 4.88 (3.67%)
PAEL 23.41 Increased By ▲ 0.77 (3.4%)
PIAA 24.55 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (1.45%)
PIBTL 6.63 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (2.63%)
PPL 125.05 Increased By ▲ 8.75 (7.52%)
PRL 26.99 Increased By ▲ 1.09 (4.21%)
PTC 13.32 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (1.83%)
SEARL 52.70 Increased By ▲ 0.70 (1.35%)
SNGP 70.80 Increased By ▲ 3.20 (4.73%)
SSGC 10.54 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TELE 8.33 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.6%)
TPLP 10.95 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.39%)
TRG 60.60 Increased By ▲ 1.31 (2.21%)
UNITY 25.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.12%)
WTL 1.28 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.79%)
BR100 7,546 Increased By 137.4 (1.85%)
BR30 24,809 Increased By 772.4 (3.21%)
KSE100 71,902 Increased By 1235.2 (1.75%)
KSE30 23,595 Increased By 371 (1.6%)

Textile exports for April, 2023 clocked in at $1.24 billion, a staggering $500 million less than the previous year’s exports for April, 2022 and a colossal $1 billion per month short of the capability due to enhanced capacity.

It is disheartening to see that over the same time period, our competing countries such as Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Vietnam posted impressive growth ranging from 10-30% in textile exports over the last year, while we struggle to keep up with our previous years’ exports.

Exogenous factors such as demand and external market forces cannot be blamed for our downfall as the decline is entirely the consequence of our short-sighted decisions and failure to follow through on the proven policies such as of providing a level playing field on energy tariffs.

The impressive surge in Pakistan’s textile exports, a remarkable 56%, $19.5 billion in 2022 from $12.5 billion in 2020, is largely attributed to the strong policy support through regionally competitive energy tariffs (RCET).

The industry’s enhanced competitiveness empowered it to invest a further $5 billion in expansion and new projects, effectively boosting export capacity by $5-6 billion per annum.

These milestones placed Pakistan firmly on track to achieving its target of $25 billion in textile exports in 2023. However, the import restrictions and unfortunate withdrawal of RCET have left the industry reeling.

The momentum is lost and investments are at risk of going to waste. The ramifications of such a decision are far-reaching and disastrous, with severe economic costs, loss of confidence, and social unrest stemming from the surge in unemployment.

In accordance with our nation’s historical metaphor of the timeless game of snakes and ladders, it appears that the predicted event outlined in the article THE SNAKE BITES ONCE AGAIN – ENERGY has indeed come true.

The government has rescinded their prior commitment to provide competitive energy tariff to our country’s export sectors, which were to extricate us from the grip of twin deficits through export-driven expansion.

This decision is distressing as it may suggest that the government has relinquished their resolve to pursue the sole viable strategy for managing our Balance of Payment (BoP).This has sent shockwaves throughout the economy, leaving essential export sectors precariously vulnerable and driving the country towards rapid deindustrialization.

Pakistan’s economic growth was on the rise and was climbing the ladder with the implementation of the Regional Competitive Energy Tariff (RCET). The promising tariff structure offered the country’s vital export sectors competitive energy rates, serving as a beacon of hope for a brighter future.

The initial tariff rates of 7 cents/kWh for electricity and $6/MMBtu for gas were highly competitive and proved to be instrumental in driving the country’s export-led growth.

As the tariff climbed to Rs 19.99/kWh and $9/MMBtu for electricity and RLNG/gas, respectively, it still remained marginally competitive.

However, the sudden complete withdrawal of RCET has dealt a fatal blow to Pakistan’s economy, leaving its export industry in shambles with the recent hike in electricity and RLNG/gas prices, from Rs 19.99/kWh to over Rs 40/kWh and $9/MMBtu to over $13/MMBtu, respectively.

This has made the industry uncompetitive in both local and international markets. Punjab’s industry in particular, with energy costs four times that of Sindh, seems to have been sacrificed at the altar of short sightedness and expediency. As a result of which, the available orders are now being shifted to cheaper alternatives, both domestically and internationally.

The withdrawal of this tariff will undoubtedly lead to further economic deterioration, including unemployment, lower exports, and bankruptcy. Due to closure or partial operation of the total installed capacity which has already resulted in significant unemployment of more than 10 million.

The rise in unemployment has had a profound impact on the nation’s youth, who account for 65% of the overall population.

They have become the ultimate collateral damage, with their aspirations and dreams dashed by the dismal wasteland of high joblessness and uncertain prospects.

Pakistan’s dependence on exports for foreign exchange has always been a challenging task, and with the withdrawal of RCET, this reliance has become even more tenuous. The current situation implies that replacing exports with mere remittances and loans is an impossible feat, which could permanently damage the Pakistani economy.

The government must realize that growth-led export policies such as RCET can lead to increased exports and higher revenues for the industry against foreign loans with high-interest rates of 7%–8%.

It’s worth noting that the total cost of regionally competitive energy tariff (RCET), if the differential is treated as the subsidy/cost is 2.67%, making it the most efficient and sustainable way of funding foreign exchange requirements.

The issue of Pakistan’s economy teetering on the brink of a severe financial crisis is not new. The question at hand is how to execute policies effectively to ameliorate long-standing disadvantages and secure the future of the nation.

The reintroduction of RCET will undoubtedly be a game-changer, providing an immediate boost to the struggling economy by lowering energy tariffs and keeping foreign investors engaged. However, a sustainable long-term solution is also required to secure the future of the country.

In order to find a sustainable, long-term solution, the structural issues and inefficiencies within Pakistan’s energy sector must be addressed. These issues and inefficiencies greatly impact affordability, and it is crucial that the state relinquish control of business operations to private investors and innovators.

CTBCM (competitive trading bilateral contract market) is one step in the right direction; however, it is being hampered by bureaucratic interference and unnecessary restrictions. The government has to loosen its grip on business, instead, what the nation needs are B2B deals that are free from government intervention and meddling.

This will aid in restoring competitiveness, benefiting both the industry and the state in breaking the vicious cycle of circular debt, which currently stands at Rs 4 trillion for electricity, as per the Power Division’s statement to the standing committee of national assembly and Rs 2 trillion for gas/RLNG.

It is imperative for the state to acknowledge that running businesses, particularly in the energy sector, is beyond its realm of expertise. Therefore, it is about time the state relinquished its control and granted the private sector the opportunity to take the reins for a long-term and sustainable solution. Only then can we hope to see the innovative and efficient practices of the private sector take hold and bring about the financial stability and affordability in the sector.

The crux of the matter does not solely lie in policy formulation, but rather in the effective execution of policies. The Textile Policy 2025 serves as an example of this, as it was developed after rigorous deliberations and consultations but has yet to be implemented.

The non-implementation of the Textile Policy 2025 implies that the business environment in Pakistan is not conducive to the growth of both existing and new investors. Emphasizing the implementation of policies can have a tangible impact on driving sustainable development and spurring economic growth, leading to significant improvements in Pakistan’s textile sector and exports within the next four years.

It is an undeniable fact that Pakistan has consistently fallen behind when competing countries have experienced economic take-offs. The reasons for this disparity are numerous, including a lack of long-term vision and implementation of policies, compounded by erratic energy prices and availability.

Additionally, policies have been abruptly withdrawn time and again, causing the industry to veer off its path of export-led growth.

To achieve sustained progress, it is imperative that Pakistan focuses on augmenting export earnings by implementing long-term policies while simultaneously reducing state intervention in the business arena. This approach represents the most sustainable and pragmatic means of overcoming Pakistan’s current account deficit and economic stagnation.

We hope that the decision makers take heed and reverse the decline through decisive measures in support of creating a focused export culture in the country.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Dr Gohar Ejaz

The writer is the Patron-in-Chief & Group Leader of All Pakistan Textile Mills Association (APTMA)

Comments

Comments are closed.

Az_Iz May 04, 2023 09:48pm
You are saying electricity tariffs climbed from 7 cents to Rs 19.99, which is still 7 cents. Textile industry got cheap loans under TERF. That in itself is a subsidy, until the loans are paid off. The industry should start delivering, instead of complaining and seeking more subsidies.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Az_Iz May 04, 2023 10:02pm
The rupee has depreciated significantly. Has the textile industry increased the pay for its workers proportionately. Very likely it hasn’t. So labor costs have actually decreased in dollar terms for exports and the industry pockets the difference. Stop complaining.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Tulukan Mairandi May 05, 2023 05:45am
Many clothes exported from Pakistan to Europe had hateful messages sewed onto the labels targetted at Jews, Christians and Europe. The radical population in Pakistan is going nuts. That's why exports are dropping like a rock
thumb_up Recommended (0)
WarrenDesiBuffet May 05, 2023 06:58am
Gohar is one of the biggest property tycoons. Used to easy money and big windfalls. Wants same for exports.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Tariq Qurashi May 05, 2023 10:00am
A very informative article! Given the massive devaluation of the rupee, labor costs are now about a fifth of China and half of India. This gives us the opportunity to move into value added made-ups, substantially increasing our export revenue. The skills and technical know how on how to design and make high quality Western clothing is however lacking. Also due to the IMF deal it is unlikely that subsidized electricity will be available. Manufacturers will have to turn to solar, and possibly the use of local furnace oil (which is in surplus). Industrial estates may also push to get permission to generate their own electricity.
thumb_up Recommended (0)