BR100 Decreased By (-0%)
BR30 Decreased By (-0.12%)
KSE100 No Change (0%)
KSE30 No Change (0%)
BECO 6.03 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (4.51%)
BML 52.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-0.47%)
BOP 34.25 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (0.76%)
CNERGY 8.16 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.62%)
DCL 12.34 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.15%)
FCCL 53.89 Increased By ▲ 1.06 (2.01%)
FCSC 5.22 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (2.96%)
FFL 18.03 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.45%)
FNEL 1.30 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.78%)
HUMNL 11.00 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.1%)
KEL 8.11 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.12%)
KOSM 5.38 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-2.54%)
MLCF 88.05 Increased By ▲ 1.54 (1.78%)
NBP 186.48 Increased By ▲ 1.32 (0.71%)
PACE 10.72 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.32%)
PAEL 39.94 Increased By ▲ 0.52 (1.32%)
PIAHCLA 26.17 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.19%)
PIBTL 17.32 Increased By ▲ 0.65 (3.9%)
PPL 232.78 Increased By ▲ 4.60 (2.02%)
PRL 34.95 Increased By ▲ 0.27 (0.78%)
PTC 67.56 Increased By ▲ 2.23 (3.41%)
SEARL 90.93 Increased By ▲ 0.80 (0.89%)
SSGC 27.17 Increased By ▲ 0.57 (2.14%)
TELE 8.57 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (3.5%)
THCCL 60.13 Increased By ▲ 1.63 (2.79%)
TPLP 8.76 Increased By ▲ 0.54 (6.57%)
TREET 24.54 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.04%)
TRG 71.75 Increased By ▲ 2.04 (2.93%)
WAVES 9.98 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.4%)
WTL 1.26 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.56%)

LAHORE: Justice Shahid Bilal Hassan of the Lahore High Court (LHC) on Wednesday refused to hear a plea of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf Chair-man Imran Khan challenging ban imposed by the Pakistan Electronic and Media Regulatory Authority (Pemra) on airing his speeches and press talks.

The judge recused himself from hearing the petition citing personal reasons and referred the same to Chief Justice for its disposal by some other appropriate bench.

The Pemra had imposed the ban after Imran Khan lashed out at former army chief Qamar Javed Bajwa for what he called ‘protecting incumbent rulers in their alleged corruption cases’.

The petitioner through his counsel argued that the Pemra issued the impugned order without having regard to the constitutional rights guaranteed under Articles 19 and 19-A of the Constitution.

He said a plain reading of section 27 of the Pemra Ordinance, prima-facie, showed that it does not empower the authority to issue a blanket prohibition order. He also pointed out that a judgment handed down by the Islamabad High Court declared a similar prohibition order against the petitioner as ultra vires of the Ordinance.

The petitioner alleged that the Pemra without applying its mind on the behest of the federal government took the illegal and unlawful action against the petitioner to settle political rivalries.

He therefore prayed the court to set aside the impugned ban for being violative to Article 10-A of the constitution.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.