BR100 Increased By (0.01%)
BR30 Decreased By (-0.04%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.05%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.02%)
AGHA 6.69 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.3%)
BECO 4.38 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.69%)
BML 56.60 Increased By ▲ 0.43 (0.77%)
BOP 30.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.07%)
CNERGY 12.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.62%)
CSIL 5.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.19%)
FCCL 51.80 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.29%)
FFL 14.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.07%)
FNEL 1.22 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.83%)
KEL 6.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.17%)
KOSM 5.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.2%)
LOTCHEM 26.50 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (1.26%)
MLCF 90.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-0.37%)
NBP 163.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.29 (-0.18%)
NCPL 53.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-0.32%)
NPL 59.19 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.12%)
OGDC 314.00 Increased By ▲ 0.61 (0.19%)
PACE 9.85 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.82%)
PAEL 35.08 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.45%)
PIBTL 14.67 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.27%)
PPL 220.17 Decreased By ▼ -1.19 (-0.54%)
PRL 91.35 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (0.14%)
PTC 59.39 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (0.34%)
SSGC 23.30 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TBL 8.82 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.8%)
TELE 7.61 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TPL 22.20 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (0.77%)
TPLP 12.60 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.32%)
TREET 21.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.32%)
TRG 55.85 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.11%)

LAHORE: Justice Shahid Bilal Hassan of the Lahore High Court (LHC) on Wednesday refused to hear a plea of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf Chair-man Imran Khan challenging ban imposed by the Pakistan Electronic and Media Regulatory Authority (Pemra) on airing his speeches and press talks.

The judge recused himself from hearing the petition citing personal reasons and referred the same to Chief Justice for its disposal by some other appropriate bench.

The Pemra had imposed the ban after Imran Khan lashed out at former army chief Qamar Javed Bajwa for what he called ‘protecting incumbent rulers in their alleged corruption cases’.

The petitioner through his counsel argued that the Pemra issued the impugned order without having regard to the constitutional rights guaranteed under Articles 19 and 19-A of the Constitution.

He said a plain reading of section 27 of the Pemra Ordinance, prima-facie, showed that it does not empower the authority to issue a blanket prohibition order. He also pointed out that a judgment handed down by the Islamabad High Court declared a similar prohibition order against the petitioner as ultra vires of the Ordinance.

The petitioner alleged that the Pemra without applying its mind on the behest of the federal government took the illegal and unlawful action against the petitioner to settle political rivalries.

He therefore prayed the court to set aside the impugned ban for being violative to Article 10-A of the constitution.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.