AIRLINK 74.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-0.42%)
BOP 5.06 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
CNERGY 4.47 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.22%)
DFML 40.00 Increased By ▲ 0.27 (0.68%)
DGKC 87.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-0.34%)
FCCL 21.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-0.59%)
FFBL 35.02 Increased By ▲ 0.43 (1.24%)
FFL 9.96 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (2.15%)
GGL 10.58 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.86%)
HBL 114.06 Increased By ▲ 0.27 (0.24%)
HUBC 136.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.37 (-0.27%)
HUMNL 11.90 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (9.17%)
KEL 4.80 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (2.78%)
KOSM 4.66 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.43%)
MLCF 38.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-0.7%)
OGDC 136.20 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.04%)
PAEL 26.80 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (0.71%)
PIAA 20.80 Decreased By ▼ -1.69 (-7.51%)
PIBTL 6.75 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.2%)
PPL 122.89 Increased By ▲ 0.60 (0.49%)
PRL 26.99 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.07%)
PTC 14.52 Increased By ▲ 0.61 (4.39%)
SEARL 60.55 Increased By ▲ 0.68 (1.14%)
SNGP 70.34 Increased By ▲ 0.28 (0.4%)
SSGC 10.40 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.48%)
TELE 8.65 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.29%)
TPLP 11.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.35%)
TRG 65.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.65 (-0.98%)
UNITY 26.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.11%)
WTL 1.36 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.74%)
BR100 7,858 Increased By 33.9 (0.43%)
BR30 25,460 Increased By 54 (0.21%)
KSE100 75,339 Increased By 255 (0.34%)
KSE30 24,173 Increased By 79.5 (0.33%)

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court (LHC) allowed a petition of a woman, Mahnoor Azhar, and held that a decree issued by a family court about the annual increase in maintenance would deem to have come into effect from the date of institution of the suit, not the date of the decree issued.

The court observed that the petitioners are entitled to 10 percent annual increase in the maintenance amount awarded to them from the date of institution of the suit.

It is a settled legal position that the purpose of the Family Act, 1964 is to protect the minors and women, who are considered to be part of the vulnerable segment of society, the court added.

The court observed that it would be against the interest and welfare of the minors to grant annual increase from the date of decree issued, particularly in cases like the one in hand where there is almost a gap of six years between the date of institution of the suit and date of final order passed.

The court said if the plea of the respondent, Lt Col Muhammad Sohail Khan, as to grant of annual increase from the date of decree is allowed, it would not only frustrate the object of the law but also put premium in the hands of a defendant. “Such an interpretation will be contrary and repugnant to the object and purpose of the law,” the court added.

The petitioners were real children, born out of the wedlock of petitioner Mahnoor and respondent Lt Col Muhammad Sohail Khan.

The petitioners had instituted a suit for maintenance in the year 2004, which was decreed by the family court on January 28, 2010.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2022

Comments

Comments are closed.

Adnan May 04, 2023 10:27am
Kindly mention the case number or citation number
thumb_up Recommended (0)