AIRLINK 80.58 Increased By ▲ 1.17 (1.47%)
BOP 5.29 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.75%)
CNERGY 4.36 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.46%)
DFML 34.96 Increased By ▲ 1.77 (5.33%)
DGKC 76.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.62 (-0.81%)
FCCL 20.59 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.29%)
FFBL 32.15 Increased By ▲ 0.75 (2.39%)
FFL 9.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.02%)
GGL 10.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.98%)
HBL 117.71 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-0.19%)
HUBC 134.70 Increased By ▲ 0.60 (0.45%)
HUMNL 7.04 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.57%)
KEL 4.56 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-2.36%)
KOSM 4.74 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
MLCF 37.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.37%)
OGDC 136.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-0.14%)
PAEL 23.03 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-0.52%)
PIAA 27.04 Increased By ▲ 0.49 (1.85%)
PIBTL 6.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.71%)
PPL 113.39 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-0.32%)
PRL 27.36 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.58%)
PTC 14.79 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.27%)
SEARL 57.04 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.28%)
SNGP 66.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.70 (-1.04%)
SSGC 11.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.81%)
TELE 9.26 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.33%)
TPLP 11.56 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TRG 72.64 Increased By ▲ 0.54 (0.75%)
UNITY 25.51 Increased By ▲ 0.69 (2.78%)
WTL 1.36 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-2.86%)
BR100 7,555 Increased By 29.3 (0.39%)
BR30 24,681 Increased By 31.9 (0.13%)
KSE100 72,150 Increased By 178.3 (0.25%)
KSE30 23,814 Increased By 64.7 (0.27%)

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court summoned the Chairman Sheikh Zayed Hospital (SZH) on Thursday (today) in a petition seeking implementation of a Supreme Court’s order regarding regularization of work-charge employees.

The court also directed a law officer to ensure the presence of the Station House Officer (SHO) Old Anarkali.

Earlier, the petitioners’ counsel Hafiz Tariq Nasim argued that the Supreme Court through its order on June 2, 2018, had directed the respondents to regularize the services of the employees working on daily wages within two months in the presence of the Chairman SZH and other concerned authorities.

The counsel stated that the respondents had not complied with the SC order apparently on the pretext that the orders issued in human rights cases were not binding. He argued that it had been settled that there was no difference between the Supreme Court’s orders in petitions and human rights cases.

The lawyer therefore asked the court to ensure implementation of the apex court. The counsel for the hospital failed to satisfy the court on non-implementation of the SC order and hence the court summoned the Chairman and other concerned authorities of the hospital in person.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2021

Comments

Comments are closed.