AIRLINK 72.59 Increased By ▲ 3.39 (4.9%)
BOP 4.99 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.84%)
CNERGY 4.29 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.7%)
DFML 31.71 Increased By ▲ 0.46 (1.47%)
DGKC 80.90 Increased By ▲ 3.65 (4.72%)
FCCL 21.42 Increased By ▲ 1.42 (7.1%)
FFBL 35.19 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (0.54%)
FFL 9.33 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (2.3%)
GGL 9.82 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.2%)
HBL 112.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-0.32%)
HUBC 136.50 Increased By ▲ 3.46 (2.6%)
HUMNL 7.14 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (2.73%)
KEL 4.35 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (2.84%)
KOSM 4.35 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (2.35%)
MLCF 37.67 Increased By ▲ 1.07 (2.92%)
OGDC 137.75 Increased By ▲ 4.88 (3.67%)
PAEL 23.41 Increased By ▲ 0.77 (3.4%)
PIAA 24.55 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (1.45%)
PIBTL 6.63 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (2.63%)
PPL 125.05 Increased By ▲ 8.75 (7.52%)
PRL 26.99 Increased By ▲ 1.09 (4.21%)
PTC 13.32 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (1.83%)
SEARL 52.70 Increased By ▲ 0.70 (1.35%)
SNGP 70.80 Increased By ▲ 3.20 (4.73%)
SSGC 10.54 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TELE 8.33 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.6%)
TPLP 10.95 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.39%)
TRG 60.60 Increased By ▲ 1.31 (2.21%)
UNITY 25.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.12%)
WTL 1.28 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.79%)
BR100 7,546 Increased By 137.4 (1.85%)
BR30 24,809 Increased By 772.4 (3.21%)
KSE100 71,902 Increased By 1235.2 (1.75%)
KSE30 23,595 Increased By 371 (1.6%)

The Islamabad High Court (IHC) Thursday issued a notice to Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) over its failure to notify rules under sub-section (2) of Section 37 of the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA) 2016.

The IHC on 12 September 2019 had directed the PTA to frame rules under Section 37(2) of the PECA, 2016, within 90 days after the ruling.

The petitioner said that almost six months had passed but order had not been implemented.

The Awami Workers Party (AWP) on Thursday filed a petition seeking contempt proceedings against the PTA for failing to comply.

The IHC bench comprising Chief Justice Athar Minallah issued the notice to the PTA.

In 2019, the AWP approached the high court after their website was blocked by the PTA. The authority had maintained that it was empowered under Section37(2) of PECA, 2016 to block the website. The court had ruled that the authority was not empowered to block any website in violation of due process, and without hearing the viewpoint of the other party.

"This interpretation of Section 37 of the Act of 2016 is in flagrant violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution as well as the settled law enunciated by the superior courts," read the order. The court noted that the principles of natural justice were required to be read into every statute.

It further observed that Article 10A made it mandatory to observe the requirements of due process before passing any order or taking any action, whereby persons could be adversely affected.

"The legislature in its wisdom by using the expression 'shall' has manifested its intention that it is mandatory for the authority to prescribe rules for the purposes described under Section 37(2) of the Act of 2016," it added.

Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act 2016

Section37: Unlawful on-line content

(1) The Authority shall have the power to remove or block or issue directions for removal or blocking of access to an information through any information system if it considers it necessary in the interest of the glory of Islam or the integrity, security or defence of Pakistan or any part thereof, public order, decency or morality, or in relation to contempt of court or commission of or incitement to an offence under this Act.

(2) The Authority shall, with the approval of the Federal Government, prescribe rules providing for, among other matters, safeguards, transparent process and effective oversight mechanism for exercise of powers under sub-section (1).

(3) Until such rules are prescribed under sub-section (2), the Authority shall exercise its powers under this Act or any other law for the time being in force in accordance with the directions issued by the Federal Government not inconsistent with the provisions of this Act.

(4) Any person aggrieved from any order passed by the Authority under sub-section (1), may file an application with the Authority for review of the order within thirty days from the date of passing of the order.

(5) An appeal against the decision of the Authority in review shall lie before the High Court within thirty days of the order of the Authority in review.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2020

Comments

Comments are closed.