AIRLINK 74.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-0.34%)
BOP 5.14 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.78%)
CNERGY 4.55 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (2.94%)
DFML 37.15 Increased By ▲ 1.31 (3.66%)
DGKC 89.90 Increased By ▲ 1.90 (2.16%)
FCCL 22.40 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (0.9%)
FFBL 33.03 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (0.95%)
FFL 9.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.41%)
GGL 10.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.46%)
HBL 115.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.40 (-0.35%)
HUBC 137.10 Increased By ▲ 1.26 (0.93%)
HUMNL 9.95 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.12%)
KEL 4.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.22%)
KOSM 4.83 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (3.65%)
MLCF 39.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-0.33%)
OGDC 138.20 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (0.22%)
PAEL 27.00 Increased By ▲ 0.57 (2.16%)
PIAA 24.24 Decreased By ▼ -2.04 (-7.76%)
PIBTL 6.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.3%)
PPL 123.62 Increased By ▲ 0.72 (0.59%)
PRL 27.40 Increased By ▲ 0.71 (2.66%)
PTC 13.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.71%)
SEARL 61.75 Increased By ▲ 3.05 (5.2%)
SNGP 70.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-0.36%)
SSGC 10.52 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (1.54%)
TELE 8.57 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.12%)
TPLP 11.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.28 (-2.46%)
TRG 64.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.33%)
UNITY 26.76 Increased By ▲ 0.71 (2.73%)
WTL 1.38 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BR100 7,874 Increased By 36.2 (0.46%)
BR30 25,596 Increased By 136 (0.53%)
KSE100 75,342 Increased By 411.7 (0.55%)
KSE30 24,214 Increased By 68.6 (0.28%)

K-Electric (KE) has countered the claims made by officials of the Ministry of Water & Power and NEPRA on KE's technical and financial operations in the Senate Standing Committee's meeting held on 29th July. Rebutting allegations on the pricing of electricity, a KE press statement unequivocally stated that K-Electric was not purchasing electricity at a cheaper rate than the rest of the country's Distribution Companies (Discos), nor was it purchasing power at a subsidised or discounted rate.
KE clarified that the rate being charged by NTDC is subject to a decision by the Economic Co-ordination Committee issued in 2008 which states in Clause 5: "It was inter alia agreed, in principle, that KESC be treated at part with the Discos for tariff purposes which shall be applicable with prospective effect as per rules."(ECC Decision -October 2008)
The statement elaborated that the ECC had made this decision after noting that Karachi was being discriminated against by being sold electricity at a higher rate than other Discos. This decision eliminated disparity and brought Karachi at par with other Discos.
The statement further clarified that there is a uniform tariff regime across the country. The tariffs being charged by KE to consumers are determined entirely by Nepra after a scrutiny of K-Electric's generation, power purchasing, and other particulars. Hence all claims that the electricity being sold to the consumers was at a cheaper rate than it was bought are being blown out of proportion. The KE statement reiterated that at no point has KE received any discount from the NTDC and all payments to the institution have been made.
Correcting the allegation, that the price of gas supply being charged to KE would bankrupt the Sui Southern Gas Company, the press statement mentioned that the tariffs for gas supply were determined by Ogra and that KE was being charged the same tariff which was applicable to Wapda, Generation Companies (Gencos), and the Power Sector. This tariff amount is the third highest as determined by Ogra. Making unsubstantiated claims was akin to deliberate defamation of KE's operational integrity.
KE has conducted meetings with the government, with K-Electric's management on every level, contrary to the rumour that the management had been unavailable. Welcoming the decision to continue supply of 650 MW to the city, the press statement also mentioned that KE had voiced its opinions on all forums regarding the importance of 650MW supply to Karachi.
The KE statement added that the addition to the system made by KE was being misquoted by Nepra. KE has added 1037MW to its generation fleet since 2009 and also invested in rehabilitating plants which were running on low efficiency. In fact, Nepra itself had approved the licenses for the generation plants, so it was absurd for them to go back on their documented approval. The statement concluded by adding that KE has also made a substantial investment in transmission and distribution network of the system. The series of accusations seemed to deliberately take a stance against K-Electric, which was of high concern. Such baseless rumours would negatively impact the sentiment of foreign investors who have invested in K-Electric and who were looking at Karachi and Pakistan as a lucrative market.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2015

Comments

Comments are closed.