AIRLINK 167.70 Increased By ▲ 2.34 (1.42%)
BOP 10.60 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (2.02%)
CNERGY 8.43 Increased By ▲ 0.60 (7.66%)
FCCL 46.65 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (2.19%)
FFL 15.34 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (1.46%)
FLYNG 26.51 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.11%)
HUBC 137.40 Increased By ▲ 2.12 (1.57%)
HUMNL 13.15 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (2.33%)
KEL 4.29 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (2.39%)
KOSM 5.60 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (2.38%)
MLCF 60.97 Increased By ▲ 1.54 (2.59%)
OGDC 217.10 Increased By ▲ 4.03 (1.89%)
PACE 5.54 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (2.4%)
PAEL 42.35 Increased By ▲ 0.34 (0.81%)
PIAHCLA 17.15 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.59%)
PIBTL 10.18 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (2.52%)
POWER 12.03 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (2.04%)
PPL 178.00 Increased By ▲ 3.21 (1.84%)
PRL 36.09 Increased By ▲ 1.73 (5.03%)
PTC 23.10 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (1.76%)
SEARL 95.90 Increased By ▲ 2.15 (2.29%)
SSGC 37.15 Increased By ▲ 1.04 (2.88%)
SYM 13.90 Increased By ▲ 0.42 (3.12%)
TELE 7.23 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.54%)
TPLP 10.38 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (1.67%)
TRG 62.51 Increased By ▲ 1.58 (2.59%)
WAVESAPP 10.37 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.88%)
WTL 1.32 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (3.13%)
YOUW 3.72 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.54%)
BR100 12,376 Increased By 62.8 (0.51%)
BR30 36,990 Increased By 482.7 (1.32%)
KSE100 115,625 Increased By 715.3 (0.62%)
KSE30 35,701 Increased By 160 (0.45%)

LAHORE: Companies falling under a special law can use Workers Profit Participation Fund (WPPF) for their business operations and the income from such funds including capital gain would be exempted from levy of tax.

According to details, a taxation officer had re-assessed the tax return filed by a beverage company and created an additional demand on account of WPPF and interest thereon, which was confirmed by the Commissioner Appeals.

The department stressed on justifying the levy of tax while the taxpayer opposed it on the ground that deduction made on account of the Companies Profits (Workers Participation) Act, 1968 does not fall within the ambit of the income tax. But the taxpayer said the relevant Act is a special law that clearly provides an exemption on income of the funds including capital gain.

It may be noted that the income tax law specifies that where an allowance or deduction has been made for any year in respect of any loss, bad debt, expenditure or trading liability, which has not been paid within three years of the income year in which it was allowed, such liability deemed to be income from business of the year in which such finding is made.

However, the department could not prove that whether the transferred amount to the WPPF by the taxpayer fell within the definition of trading liability or was a statutory liability.

The tribunal maintained that the income arising out of funds was declared exempt from the incidence of income tax, therefore, the assessing officer was not justified to make addition to the self-assessed income tax return. It was further pointed out that companies falling under the scheme of the Act were allowed to use funds for their business operations, however, they were obliged to pay profit @2.5% above the bank rate to compensate the use of these funds in the business operations.

According to the tribunal, the aforementioned Act is a special law and would prevail over the Income Tax Ordinance and the department was making an incorrect reading of the law.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.