AIRLINK 74.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.28 (-0.38%)
BOP 5.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.2%)
CNERGY 4.44 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.45%)
DFML 40.25 Increased By ▲ 0.52 (1.31%)
DGKC 87.61 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.07%)
FCCL 21.97 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.18%)
FFBL 35.06 Increased By ▲ 0.47 (1.36%)
FFL 9.98 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (2.36%)
GGL 10.53 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.38%)
HBL 114.00 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (0.18%)
HUBC 136.44 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.06%)
HUMNL 11.90 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (9.17%)
KEL 4.88 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (4.5%)
KOSM 4.65 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.22%)
MLCF 38.60 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (0.36%)
OGDC 135.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.44 (-0.32%)
PAEL 27.01 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (1.5%)
PIAA 20.80 Decreased By ▼ -1.69 (-7.51%)
PIBTL 6.68 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.15%)
PPL 123.30 Increased By ▲ 1.01 (0.83%)
PRL 27.17 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (0.74%)
PTC 14.09 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (1.29%)
SEARL 59.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-0.2%)
SNGP 70.49 Increased By ▲ 0.43 (0.61%)
SSGC 10.40 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.48%)
TELE 8.57 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.35%)
TPLP 11.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.35%)
TRG 65.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.55 (-0.83%)
UNITY 26.36 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.11%)
WTL 1.35 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BR100 7,845 Increased By 20.8 (0.27%)
BR30 25,481 Increased By 75.5 (0.3%)
KSE100 75,257 Increased By 173.4 (0.23%)
KSE30 24,127 Increased By 33.6 (0.14%)

ISLAMABAD: Former chief justice of Pakistan Tassaduq Hussain Jillani recused from the Commission, constituted by the federal government to probe the allegations levelled by six judges of the Islamabad High Court (IHC) in a letter to the Supreme Judicial Council (SJC).

In a one-page letter, to Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, the former CJP thanked him and the cabinet for reposing confidence in him to head the commission. “I am also grateful to the CJP Qazi Faiz Isa and senior puisne judge Syed Mansoor Ali Shah for expressing confidence in me,” added the letter.

However, ex-CJP Jilani wrote: “Since the letter (IHC judges) is addressed to the members of the Supreme Judicial Council and its chairman the Chief Justice of Pakistan, it would be violative of judicial propriety for me to inquire into a matter which may fall within the jurisdiction of a constitutional body which is the Supreme Judicial Council or the Supreme Court of Pakistan itself”.

He further wrote that the terms of the reference for the inquiry are not “strictly” relevant to the subject under consideration. The request made in the letter is for an “institutional consultation”, with the terms of the mechanism suggested in the letter, he added.

The ex-CJP maintained that the letter may not strictly fall within the parameters of Article 209 of the Constitution. He, therefore, declined to head the commission and proceed with the inquiry.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.