AGL 22.90 Decreased By ▼ -1.83 (-7.4%)
AIRLINK 103.99 Decreased By ▼ -7.11 (-6.4%)
BOP 5.36 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-3.25%)
CNERGY 3.86 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-1.03%)
DCL 8.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.43 (-5.09%)
DFML 39.10 Decreased By ▼ -3.15 (-7.46%)
DGKC 86.95 Decreased By ▼ -2.65 (-2.96%)
FCCL 22.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.87%)
FFBL 40.59 Decreased By ▼ -1.39 (-3.31%)
FFL 8.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-1.66%)
HUBC 153.50 Decreased By ▼ -8.70 (-5.36%)
HUMNL 10.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.70 (-6.17%)
KEL 4.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-4.81%)
KOSM 3.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-3.94%)
MLCF 37.50 Decreased By ▼ -1.45 (-3.72%)
NBP 49.00 Decreased By ▼ -1.60 (-3.16%)
OGDC 134.15 Decreased By ▼ -2.96 (-2.16%)
PAEL 26.15 Decreased By ▼ -2.40 (-8.41%)
PIBTL 6.07 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-2.88%)
PPL 116.79 Decreased By ▼ -6.01 (-4.89%)
PRL 23.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.75 (-3.09%)
PTC 12.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.84 (-6.11%)
SEARL 57.25 Decreased By ▼ -2.80 (-4.66%)
TELE 7.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-3.99%)
TOMCL 35.74 Decreased By ▼ -3.66 (-9.29%)
TPLP 8.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-2.97%)
TREET 15.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.52 (-3.21%)
TRG 56.40 Decreased By ▼ -3.60 (-6%)
UNITY 33.40 Decreased By ▼ -1.00 (-2.91%)
WTL 1.18 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-3.28%)
BR100 8,433 Decreased By -274.3 (-3.15%)
BR30 26,639 Decreased By -1159 (-4.17%)
KSE100 80,118 Decreased By -1722 (-2.1%)
KSE30 25,681 Decreased By -584.1 (-2.22%)

EDITORIAL: After long deliberations and numerous announcements of intent, gas prices have finally increased. However, this delay does not come without a cost. The prices which were supposed to increase by July are not effective from November. However, the notorious circular debt tap had to be turned off from July onwards.

Hence, the cost of delay by four months, which is estimated at Rs 65 billion, is to be recovered from consumers and, consequently, the increase is higher to compensate it.

That is not the first time a delay has happened. In fact, the gas price increase has been postponed since 2013-14. There were some attempts to increase here and there but were not enough.

The supply of RLNG started increasing with decline in the production of natural gas. The higher cost could never be recovered. Today, the gas circular debt, which was almost non-existent a decade ago, now represents a whopping Rs 2100 billion amount without late payment surcharges.

There were adverse consequences due to this. The debt accumulation is mostly parked in the state-owned energy companies such as OGDC (Oil and Gas Development Company), PPL (Pakistan Petroleum Limited) and PSO (Pakistan State Oil).

The balance sheets of these companies became hollow, and the E&P (exploration and production) companies stopped exploring new wells and the number of oil and gas discoveries came down to close to zero. That has exacerbated the problem and the reliance on imported RLNG began to rise. That started putting a huge strain on the balance of payment and accelerated the accumulation of circular debt.

With the recent round of increase, the tap of circular debt is said to be turned off. Well, there is no doubt about it if one sees the complex spreadsheet mathematical model. But like any model, it has assumptions. One assumption is to have timely revision of prices based on the RLNG import and PKR/USD parity.

The other is not having any misuse of sectors that are still protected. For example, the tariff for tandoors has been kept low and unchanged, as the government does not want roti to become more expensive as it is already becoming unaffordable for marginal consumers. The intent is right but there could be risk of misuse as the past is full of instances where gas was rerouted for other purposes than actually intended.

The fertilizer prices have been kept low on the premise that urea prices should be kept low to ensure food security. Urea prices in Pakistan are half (or less) than the international prices, as the price of gas being supplied to fertilizer companies is a small fraction of international gas prices. This implies part of the benefit is being enjoyed by fertilizer companies which is evident by their high EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) margins.

However, there is a problem of smuggling of fertilizer from Pakistan to Afghanistan and beyond. This is like smuggling out of cheap local gas and importing the expensive RLNG to fill the gap.

There is nothing in the gas pricing model to cover this abuse. One can understand that abrupt change in subsidy mechanism by direct provisioning to farmers can trigger a crisis in view of the poor governance structure, and the fact that the recent experience of DAP subsidy was an abject failure. However, that does not mean that reforms in urea pricing are not warranted.

The bottom-line is that price rationalisation of gas is a welcome move; but the work doesn’t end here. There is much more to do, and the next government has to continue the reforms and should sway away from the idea of pricing benefit to anyone and try to be innovative in providing sasti roti and urea.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023


Comments are closed.

saif khan Nov 06, 2023 09:50am
care taker gov ka kam banta ha k media pr a ky awam ko btyain ky last gov jo gai ha unho ne jaan bojh ky delay kia q k agar wo jany se pahly price hike kar jaty to unhain political nuqsan hota khul ky clear bat awam se share karain aur bahany na talash karain gareeb awam se last four months ki recovery karny ky...
thumb_up Recommended (0)
KU Nov 06, 2023 10:45am
The bottom line is that the policymaker's cognitive ability is challenged, and this is also a lesson on how to plan ahead for the growing population as well as industry. But since we have a rolly-polly leadership mostly interested in its own wealth, this dangerous stitch-in-time-wasted will not provide any solution to woes. By the way, BR forgot to mention the lingering issue of gas theft, assumed to be around Rs. 500 billion.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Habib ur Rehman Nov 06, 2023 02:07pm
Sir kindly lift the ban new connections in D-12 isb
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Cool boy Nov 07, 2023 12:31pm
Yes the job is not done... People should get ready to pay bhatta for imported LNG... First it is high priced secondly it needs regasification facilities which also add in costs. This is all due to stupid policies to appease Arab rulers by not burning local fossil fuels and depending on imported ones
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Tariq Qurashi Nov 07, 2023 12:42pm
With the massive increases in gas prices , I wouldn't be surprised if consumption falls off and there is a surplus of gas. On the other hand the theft of gas is likely to go up, as is the sound of the chopping of wood as our remaining trees are chopped down for firewood. Also the demand for electricity may rise if people start cooking with electricity instead of gas. As usual this points towards poor planning; the usual bureaucratic inaction, lack of coordination, and reactive rather than proactive decision making. We react when the problem hits us on the head, rather than taking corrective action well in time.
thumb_up Recommended (0)